Skip to main content
Log in

On the structure and properties of a linear multilevel programming problem

  • Contributed Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many decision-making situations involve multiple planners with different, and sometimes conflicting, objective functions. One type of model that has been suggested to represent such situations is the linear multilevel programming problem. However, it appears that theoretical and algorithmic results for linear multilevel programming have been limited, to date, to the bounded case or the case of when only two levels exist. In this paper, we investigate the structure and properties of a linear multilevel programming problem that may be unbounded. We study the geometry of the problem and its feasible region. We also give necessary and sufficient conditions for the problem to be unbounded, and we show how the problem is related to a certain parametric concave minimization problem. The algorithmic implications of the results are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bracken, J., Falk, J. E., andMiercort, F. A.,A Strategic Weapons Exchange Allocation Model, Operations Research, Vol. 25, pp. 968–976, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cassidy, R. G., Kirby, M. J. L., andRaike, W. M.,Efficient Distribution of Resources through Three Levels of Government, Management Science, Vol. 17, pp. B462-B473, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fortuny-Amat, J., andMcCarl, B.,A Representation and Economic Interpretation of a Two-Level Programming Problem, Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 32, pp. 783–792, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Candler, W., andTownsley, R.,A Linear Two-Level Programming Problem, Computers and Operations Research, Vol. 9, pp. 59–76, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bard, J. F.,Geometric and Algorithmic Developments for a Hierarchical Planning Problem, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 19, pp. 372–383, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jeroslow, R. G.,The Polynomial Hierarchy and a Simple Model for Competitive Analysis, Mathematical Programming, Vol. 32, pp. 146–164, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bard, J. F., andFalk, J. E.,An Explicit Solution to the Multi-Level Programming Problem, Computers and Operations Research, Vol. 9, pp. 77–100, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bialas, W. F., andKarwan, M. H.,On Two-Level Optimization, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. AC-27, pp. 211–214, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bard, J. F.,Optimality Conditions for the Bilevel Programming Problem, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, Vol. 31, pp. 13–26, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bard, J. F.,An Efficient Algorithm for a Linear Two-Stage Optimization Problem, Operations Research, Vol. 31, pp. 670–684, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bialas, W. F., andKarwan, M. H.,Two-Level Linear Programming, Management Science, Vol. 30, pp. 1004–1020, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bard, J. F.,An Algorithm for Solving the General Bilevel Programming Problem, Mathematics of Operations Research, Vol. 8, pp. 260–272, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Spivey, W. A., andThrall, R. M.,Linear Optimization, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, New York, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rockafellar, R. T.,Convex Analysis, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hogan, W. W.,Point-to-Set Maps in Mathematical Programming, SIAM Review, Vol. 15, pp. 591–603, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Naccache, P. H.,Connectedness of the Set of Nondominated Outcomes in Multicriteria Optimization, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 25, pp. 459–467, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Martos, B.,The Direct Power of Adjacent Vertex Programming Methods, Management Science, Vol. 12, pp. 241–252, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Epelman, M. S.,On a Property of Polyhedral Sets, Mathematical Programming, Vol. 16, pp. 371–373, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Benson, H. P.,A Finite Algorithm for Concave Minimization over a Polyhedron, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, Vol. 32, pp. 165–177, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cabot, A. V.,Variations on a Cutting Plane Method for Solving Concave Minimization Problems with Linear Constraints, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, Vol. 21, pp. 265–274, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Carrillo, M. J.,A Relaxation Algorithm for the Minimization of a Quasiconcave Function on a Convex Polyhedron, Mathematical Programming, Vol. 13, pp. 69–80, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Falk, J. E., andHoffman, K. R.,A Successive Underestimation Method for Concave Minimization Problems, Mathematics of Operations Research, Vol. 1, pp. 251–259, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Majthay, A., andWhinston, A.,Quasiconcave Minimization Subject to Linear Constraints, Discrete Mathematics, Vol. 9, pp. 35–59, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Thoai, N. V., andTuy, H.,Convergent Algorithms for Minimizing a Concave Function, Mathematics of Operations Research, Vol. 5, pp. 556–566, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zwart, P. B.,Global Maximization of a Convex Function with Linear Inequality Constraints, Operations Research, Vol. 22, pp. 602–609, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by P. L. Yu

This research was supported by National Science Foundation Grant No. ECS-85-15231.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Benson, H.P. On the structure and properties of a linear multilevel programming problem. J Optim Theory Appl 60, 353–373 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00940342

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00940342

Key Words

Navigation