Abstract
This paper describes the trends in course-by-course grading at a large public urban university over a recent six-year period. To determine if systematic grade inflation was occurring, the study analyzed 144 individual undergraduate courses. Multiple linear regressions were fitted to more than 125,000 final course grades by courses. Most course grading patterns showed little evidence of systematic and homogeneous change over time. Hence, the increasing cumulative GPA for undergraduates at the institution studied was not caused by a general relaxing of grading standards. Rather, the supposition is that more students are moving away from traditional curricula into courses and degree programs which they find have grading standards reflecting their abilities and/or interests.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aiken, L. R. The grading behavior of a college faculty.Educational and Psychological Measurement 1963,23 319–322.
Blackburn, R., Armstrong, E., Conrad, C., Didham, J., & McKune, T. Changing practices in undergraduate education, a report for the Carnegie Council on Policy Studies in Higher Education. Berkeley: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1976.
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P.Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Wiley, 1975.
Davidson, J. F. Academic interest rates and grade inflation.Educational Record 1975,56 122–125.
Etzioni, A. Grade inflation.Science 1975,190 101.
Goldman, R. D., & Hewitt, B. N. Adaptation-level as an explanation for differential standards in college grading.Journal of Educational Measurement 1975,12 149–161.
Goldman, R. D., Schmidt, D. E., Hewitt, B. N., & Fisher, R. Grading practices in different major fields.American Educational Research Journal 1974,11 343–357.
Goldman, R. D., & Slaughter, R. E. Why college grade point average is difficult to predict.Journal of Educational Psychology 1976,68 9–14.
Goldman, R. D., & Widawski, M. A within-subjects technique for comparing college grading standards: Implications in validity of the evaluation of college achievement.Educational and Psychological Measurement 1976,36 381–390.
Helson, H. Adaptation-level as frame of reference for prediction of psychophysical data.American Journal of Psychology 1947,60 1–29.
Hills, J. R. The effect of admissions policy on college grading standards.Journal of Educational Measurement 1964,2 115–118.
Hills, J. R., & Gladney, M. D. Factors influencing college grading standards.Journal of Educational Measurement 1968,5 31–39.
Ladd, E., & Lipset, S. The faculty mood: Pessimism is predominant.The Chronicle of Higher Education October 3, 1977,50(5), 1–14.
Oh, E. K. A study of instructor grading philosophies and practices at Western Michigan University. (Doctoral dissertation, Western Michigan University, 1976).Dissertation Abstracts International 1976,27 4084. (University Microfilms No. 76-10, 555)
Prather, J. E., & Smith, G. A study of the relationships between faculty characteristics, subject field, and course grading patterns.Research in Higher Education 1976,5 351–363.
Schoenfeldt, L. F., & Bush, D. H. Patterns of college grades across curricular areas: Some implications for GPA as a criterion.American Educational Research Journal 1975,12 313–32.
Suddarth, B. M. An investigation of general education requirements in college curricula.Research in Higher Education 1975,3 197–204.
Suslow, S. Grade inflation: End of a trend?Change 1977,9(3), 44–45.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Prather, J.E., Smith, G. & Kodras, J.E. A longitudinal study of grades in 144 undergraduate courses. Res High Educ 10, 11–24 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00977496
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00977496