Skip to main content
Log in

Diversity and evolutionary trends in the floral structure ofTambourissa (Monimiaceae)

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tambourissa exhibits an unusual spectrum of floral diversity, tightly linked, however, by a common ground plan. Divergent evolutionary trends have led to small, closed flowers and to secondarily open flowers, including the largest of theMonimiaceae. The myophilous and cantharophilous flowers attract pollinators by scent, colour, stigmatic nectar and pollen. Some species have attained monoecy with partial or complete self-incompatibility, others even dioecy. Extraordinary evolutionary trends include the differentiation of a hyperstigma, the carpel group formation within a gynoecium, the increasing disorder in carpel orientation with increase of carpel number, and the formation of a pseudoperianth by the sterile lobes of the floral cup.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alberch, P., Gould, S. J., Oster, G. F., Wake, D. B., 1979: Size and shape in ontogeny and phylogeny. — Paleobiol.5, 296–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baillon, H., 1869: Monimiacées. — In Histoire des plantes1, 289–344. — Paris: Hachette.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bawa, K. S., 1980: Evolution of dioecy in flowering plants. — Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst.11, 15–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, J. H., 1981: Pollinator foraging and the evolution of dioecy. — Amer. Nat.118, 572–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behnke, H.-D., 1981: Sieve-element characters. — Nord. J. Bot.1, 381–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, W., 1979: The synthetic explanation of macroevolutionary change—a reductionistic approach. — Bull. Carnegie Mus. Nat. Hist.13, 20–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlquist, S., 1962: A theory of paedomorphosis in dicotyledonous woods. — Phytomorphol.12, 30–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavaco, A., 1959: Monimiacées. — InHumbert, H., (Ed.): Flore de Madagascar et des Comores (Plantes vasculaires)80. — Paris: Firmin-Didot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corner, E. J. H., 1976: The Seeds of Dicotyledons1, 2. — Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endress, P. K., 1972: Zur vergleichenden Entwicklungsmorphologie, Embryologie und Systematik beiLaurales. — Bot. Jahrb. Syst.92, 331–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1979: Noncarpellary pollination and “hyperstigma” in an angiosperm (Tambourissa religiosa, Monimiaceae). — Experientia35, 45.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1980a: Ontogeny, function and evolution of extreme floral construction inMonimiaceae. — Pl. Syst. Evol.134, 79–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1980b: Floral structure and relationships ofHortonia (Monimiaceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.133, 199–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1980c: The reproductive structures and systematic position of theAustrobaileyaceae. — Bot. Jahrb. Syst.101, 393–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1982: Syncarpy and alternative modes of escaping disadvantages of apocarpy in primitive angiosperms. — Taxon31, 48–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Givnish, T. J., 1982: Outcrossing versus ecological constraints in the evolution of dioecy. — Amer. Nat.119, 849–865.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottsberger, G., 1970: Beiträge zur Biologie von Annonaceen-Blüten. — Österr. Bot. Z.118, 237–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1980: Reproductive biology in the primitive relic angiospermDrimys brasiliensis (Winteraceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.135, 11–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, V., 1950: The pollination ofCalycanthus occidentalis. — Amer. J. Bot.37, 294–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, P. H., 1979: Macroevolution—myth or reality? — Biol. J. Linn. Soc. London12, 293–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorence, D. H., 1980: A systematic and eco-evolutionary study of theMonimiaceae in the Malgasy region. — Ph.D. Thesis, St. Louis: Washington University.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1982: NewMonimiaceae from the Malagasy region (SW Indian Ocean). — Bull. Mus. Natn. Hist. Nat., Paris, Sér. 4,3, Sect. B, Adansonia, 293–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangenot, G., 1973: Données élémentaires sur l'angiospermie. — Ann. Univ. Abidjan, Sér. E,6, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, J., 1925: Übersicht über die Gattungen derMonimiaceae sowie Zusammenstellung der Abbildungen und der Literatur über die Arten dieser Familie bis zum Jahre 1925. — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1901:Monimiaceae. — InEngler, A., (Ed.): Das Pflanzenreich. IV. 101. — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, F. B., 1969: Studies on theMonimiaceae. 1. Floral morphology and gametophyte development ofHedycarya arborea J. R. etG. Forst. (subfamilyMonimioideae). — Austral. J. Bot.17, 403–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solms-Laubach, H., 1885: Die Geschlechterdifferenzierung bei den Feigenbäumen. — Bot. Zeitung (Berlin)43, 561–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnerat, P., 1782: Voyage aux Indes orientales et à la Chine. — Paris: Dentu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takhtajan, A., 1976: Neoteny and the origin of flowering plants. — InBeck, C. B., (Ed.): Origin and Early Evolution of Angiosperms, 207–219. — New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thien, L. B., 1980: Patterns of pollination in the primitive angiosperms. — Biotropica12, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, R. F., 1974: A phyletic classification of theAnnoniflorae. — Aliso8, 147–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulasne, L. R., 1855: MonographiaMonimiacearum. — Arch. Mus. Hist. Nat.4, 273–436.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Endress, P.K., Lorence, D.H. Diversity and evolutionary trends in the floral structure ofTambourissa (Monimiaceae). Pl Syst Evol 143, 53–81 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984112

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984112

Key words

Navigation