Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Genetic variation and natural hybridization betweenOrchis laxiflora andOrchis palustris (Orchidaceae)

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Genetic divergence between population samples ofOrchis laxiflora and ofO. palustris from various European locations was studied by electrophoretic analysis of 25 enzyme loci. An average genetic distance of DNei = 1.24 was found between the two taxa, with 12 out of 25 loci showing alternative alleles (diagnostic loci). Genetic heterogeneity was observed within bothO. laxiflora andO. palustris, when northern and southeastern populations were compared, being lower in the former taxon (D = 0.06), than in the latter (D = 0.16). Karyologically, 2n = 36 was found for bothO. laxiflora andO. palustris. O. laxiflora andO. palustris produce hybrids, described asO. ×intermedia. Genotype analysis of several sympatric samples showed the presence of hybrid zones, including F1 hybrids and, in low proportions, recombinant classes, putatively assigned to Fn and backcrosses, as well as a few introgressed individuals of both taxa. These data indicate that hybrids are only partially fertile, with a very limited mixing up of the two parental gene pools; this is also shown by the lack of significant lowering of genetic distances when sympatric and allopatric heterospecific samples are compared. Accordingly,O. laxiflora andO. palustris form a syngameon; nevertheless they can be considered as good taxonomic species, with virtually distinct gene pools, which evolve independently. The genetic variability inO. laxiflora andO. palustris is remarkably low (\(\bar H\) e = 0.05 and\(\bar H\) e = 0.02, respectively). In particular, nearly complete absence of polymorphic loci was found inO. palustris from northcentral Europe. Two hypotheses are considered to explain the low genetic variability of this endangered species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arduino, P., Cianchi, R., Rossi, W., Corrias, B., Bullini, L., 1995: Genetic variation inOrchis papilionacea (Orchidaceae) from Central Mediterrancean region: taxonomic inferences at the intraspecific level. — Pl. Syst. Evol.194: 9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumann, H., Künkele, S., 1992: Die wildwachsenden Orchideen Europas. — Stuttgart: Kosmos.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1988: Die Orchideen Europas. — Stuttgart: Kosmos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianco, P., Medagli, P., D'Emerico, S., Ruggiero, L., 1987: Numeri cromosomici per la Flora italiana: 1139–1155. — Inform. Bot. Ital.19: 322–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, G. J., Sing, C. F., 1970: An introduction to isozyme techniques. — New York, London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttler, K. P., 1986: Orchideen. Die wildwachsenden Arten und Unterarten Europas, Vorderasiens und Nordafrikas. — München: Mosaik.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1979: Morphologische und geographische Differenzierung beiOrchis palustris. — Bot. Jahrb. Syst.101: 91–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camus, E. G., Camus, A., 1929: Iconographie des orchidées d'Europe et du bassin mediterranéen. — Paris.

  • Capineri, R., Rossi, W., 1988: Numeri cromosomici per la Flora italiana: 1127–1135. — Inform. Bot. Ital.19: 314–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheliak, W. M., Pitel, J. A., 1984: Techniques for starch gel electrophoresis of enzymes from forest tree species. — Inf. Rep. Pl-X-42, Petawawa Natl. Forestry Inst., Canadian Forestry Service.

  • Corrias, B., Rossi, W., Arduino, P., Cianchi, R., Bullini, L., 1991:Orchis longicornu Poiret in Sardinia: genetic, morphological and chorological data. — Webbia45: 71–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow, J. F., Aoki, K., 1984: Group selection for a polygenic behavioral trait: estimating the degree of population subdivision. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA81: 6073–6077.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Prete, C., 1978: Contributi alla conoscenza delleOrchidaceae di Italia. — Inform. Bot. Ital.10: 379–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Emerico, S., Bianco, P., Medagli, P., Ruggiero, L., 1990: Karyological studies of some taxa of the generaHimantoglossum, Orchis, Serapias andSpiranthes (Orchidaceae) from Apulia (Italy). — Caryologia43: 267–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1993: Cytological and karyological studies onOrchidaceae. — Caryologia46: 309–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, V., 1957: The plant species in theory and practice. — InMayr, E., (Ed): The species problem, pp. 39–80. — Washington, D.C.: Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci. Publ.50.

  • Hamrick, J. L., Godt, M. J. W., 1990: Allozyme diversity in plant species. — InBrown, A. D. H., Clegg, M. T., Kahler, A. L., Weir, B. S., (Eds): Plant population genetics, breeding and genetic resources, pp. 43–63. — London, New York: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, H., 1966: Enzymes polymorphism in man. — Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. B., Biol. Sci.164: 298–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, G., 1996: Some genetic consequences of ice ages, and their role in divergence and speciation. — Biol. J. Linn. Soc.56: (in press).

  • Högström, S., 1991:Orchis palustris, its history and present status on Gotland, Sweden. — Svensk Bot. Tidskr.85: 355–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, G., Soò, R., von, 1932: Monographie und Iconographie der Orchideen Europas und des Mittelmeergebietes 2. — Berlin, Dahlem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehn, R. K., Eanes, W. F., 1978: Molecular structure and protein variation within and among populations. — Evol. Biol.11: 39–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liverani, P., 1992: Orchidee-specie spontanee. — Edisar.

  • Lönn, M., Prentice, H. C., Tegelström, H., 1995: Genetic differentiation inHippocrepis emerus (Leguminosae): allozyme and DNA fingerprint variation in disjunct Scandinavian populations. — Molec. Ecol.4: 39–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei, M., 1972: Genetic distance between populations. — Amer. Naturalist106: 283–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1973: Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA70: 3321–3323.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1977: F-statistics and analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. — Ann. Hum. Genet.41: 225–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1987: Molecular evolutionary genetics. — New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, J. S., 1972: Measures of genetic similarity and genetic distance. — Studies in Genetics VII, Univ. Texas Publ. (Austin)7213: 145–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romano, S., Campo, G., 1995: Numeri cromosomici per la flora italiana: 1336–1340. — Inform. Bot. Ital.27: 17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, W., Corrias, B., Arduino, P., Cianchi, R., Bullini, L., 1992a: Gene variation and gene flow inOrchis morio (Orchidaceae) from Italy. — Pl. Syst. Evol.179: 43–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1992b: A new natural hybrid in the genusOrchis L.: genetic data and description. — Lindleyana7: 121–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarich, V., 1977: Rates, sample sizes and the neutrality hypothesis for electrophoresis in evolutionary studies. — Nature265: 24–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scacchi, R., De Angelis, G., 1989: Isoenzyme polymorphism inGymnadenia conopsea and its inferences for systematics within this species. — Biochem. Syst. Ecol.17: 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1990: Allozyme variation among and within elevenOrchis species (fam.Orchidaceae), with special reference to hybridizing aptitude. — Genetica81: 143–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1991: Effect of the breeding system on the genetic structure in threeCephalantera spp. (Orchidaceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.176: 53–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlechter, R., 1928: Monographie und Iconographie der Orchideen Europas und des Mittelmeergebietes 1. — Berlin, Dahlem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlegel, M., Steinbrück, G., Hahn, K., Röttger, B., 1989: Interspecific relationships of ten European orchid species as revealed by enzyme electrophoresis. — Pl. Syst. Evol.163: 107–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scrugli, A., 1977: Numeri cromosomici per la Flora Italiana. — Inform. Bot. Ital.14: 275–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1981: Sul numero cromosomico diOrchis laxiflora Lam. — Inform. Bot. Ital.13: 119–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selander, R. K., Smith, M. H., Yang, S. Y., Johnson, W. E., Gentry, J. B., 1971: Biochemical polymorphism and systematics in the genusPeromyscus. I. Variation of the oldfield mouse (Peromyscus polionotus). — Studies in Genetics VI, Univ. Texas Publ. (Austin)7103: 49–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slatkin, M., Barton, N. H., 1989: A comparison of three indirect methods for estimating average levels of gene flow. — Evolution43: 1349–1368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R., Rohlf, F. J., 1981: Biometry. 2nd edn. — San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltis, D. E., Haufler, C. H., Darrow, D. C., Gastony, G. J., 1983: Starch gel electrophoresis of ferns: a compilation of grinding buffers, gel and electrode buffers and staining schedules. — Amer. Fern J.73: 9–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soó, R. von, 1980:Dactylorhiza, Orchis. — InTutin, T. G., Heywood, V. H., Burges, N. A., Valentine, D. H., Walters, S. M., Webb, D. A., (Eds): Flora Europaea5, pp. 341–342. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbrück, G., Schlegel, M., Dahlström, I., Röttger, B., 1986: Characterization of interspecific hybrids betweenOrchis mascula andO. pallens (Orchidaceae) by enzyme electrophoresis. — Pl. Syst. Evol.153: 229–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, P., 1947: Studies on Dactylorchids. — Utrecht.

  • —, 1949: Varieties and forms of Dutch orchids. — Ned. Kruidk. Arch.56: 204–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, L., Leland, J., 1989: SYSTAT: the system for statistics. — Evanston, Illinois: SYSTAT Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Workman, P. L., Niswander, J. D., 1970: Population studies on southwestern Indian tribes. II. Local genetic differentiation in the Papago. — Amer. J. Hum. Genet.22: 24–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S., 1931: Evolution in Mendelian populations. — Genetics16: 97–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1943: Isolation by distance. — Genetics28: 114–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1951: The genetical structure of populations. — Ann. Eugen.15: 323–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1978: Evolution and the genetics of populations. 4. Variability within and among natural populations. — Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. Genetics and Molecular Biology, Univ. Rome “La Sapienza”, Via Lancisi 29, I-00161, Rome, Italy

    Paola Arduino, Federica Verra, Rossella Cianchi & Luciano Bullini

  2. Dept. Environmental Sciences, Univ. L'Aquila, Coppito, I-67010, L'Aquila, Italy

    Walter Rossi

  3. Dept. Botany and Plant Ecology, Univ. Sassari, Via Muroni 25, I-07100, Sassari, Italy

    Bruno Corrias

Authors
  1. Paola Arduino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Federica Verra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rossella Cianchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Walter Rossi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Bruno Corrias
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Luciano Bullini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arduino, P., Verra, F., Cianchi, R. et al. Genetic variation and natural hybridization betweenOrchis laxiflora andOrchis palustris (Orchidaceae). Pl Syst Evol 202, 87–109 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985819

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985819

Key words

Search

Navigation