Skip to main content
Log in

Politics and personal factors in retirement from the United States Supreme Court

  • Published:
Political Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

A vacancy to be filled on the Supreme Court is a relatively rare event; continuity of service is the norm. In this paper I determine the circumstances under which justices decide to retire and, by extension, why they remain on the bench. Using a discrete-time method I find that political considerations do not appear to matter. Justices are more likely to retire when they are physically infirm and have qualified for pension benefits. But the more justices participate in the Court's activity, as evidenced by the number of opinions or dissents they write, the less likely they are to leave voluntarily.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abraham, Henry J. (1985).Justices and Presidents, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, John H., and Nelson, Forrest D. (1984).Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, Paul D. (1982). Discrete-time methods for the analysis of event histories. In Samuel Leinhardt (ed.),Sociological Methodology 1982. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, Paul D. (1984).Event History Analysis: Regression for Longitudinal Event Data. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, David N. (1976). Retirement and death on the United States Supreme Court: From Van Devanter to Douglas.UMKC Law Review 45: 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, David N. (1982). Bowing to the inevitable: Supreme Court deaths and resignations, 1789–1864.Arizona State Law Journal 1982: 615–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, Lawrence (1985).The Supreme Court. Washington D.C.: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blandford, Linda A., and Evans, Patricia Russell (1983).Supreme Court of the United States, 1789–1980: An Index to Opinions Arranged by Justice. Millwood, N.Y.: Kraus International Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaustein, Albert P., and Mersky, Roy M. (1978).The First One Hundred Justices. Hamden, Conn.: Archon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brace, Paul (1985). A probabilistic approach to retirement from the U.S. Congress.Legislative Studies Quarterly 10: 107–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldeira, Gregory A., and McCrone, Donald J. (1982). Of time and judicial activism: A study of the U.S. Supreme Court, 1800–1973. In Stephen Halpern and Charles Lamb (eds.),Supreme Court Activism and Restraint. Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Robert A. (1957). Decision-making in a democracy: The Supreme Court as a national policy-maker.Journal of Public Law 6: 279–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danelski, David J. (1965). A Supreme Court justice steps down.Yale Review 54: 411–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairman, Charles (1938). The retirement of federal justices.Harvard Law Review 51: 397–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, Eric A., and Jackson, John E. (1977).Statistical Methods for Social Scientists. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbing, John R. (1982). Voluntary retirement from the U.S. House of Representatives: Who quits?American Journal of Political Science 26: 467–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder-Williams, Richard (1980).The Politics of the US Supreme Court. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, Gary (1987). Presidential appointments to the Supreme Court: Adding systematic explanation to probabilistic description.American Politics Quarterly 15: 373–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, Gary (in press). Statistical models for political science event counts: Bias in conventional procedures and evidence for the exponential Poisson regression model.American Journal of Political Science.

  • McConnell, Stephen R. (1983). Retirement and employment. In Diana S. Woodruff and James E. Birren (eds.),Aging: Scientific Perspectives and Social Issues. Belmont, Calif.: Brooks/Cole Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidhauser, John R. (1962). When and why justices leave the Supreme Court. In Wilma Donahue and Clark Tibbitts (eds.),Politics of Age. Ann Arbor: Division of Gerontology, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Bernard (1983).Super Chief. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, Jeffrey (in press). Senate confirmation of Supreme Court justices: Partisan and institutional politics.Journal of Politics.

  • Sheppard, Harold L. (1976). Work and retirement. In Robert H. Binstock and Ethel Shanas (eds.),Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steamer, Robert J. (1986).Chief Justice. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulmer, S. Sidney (1982). Supreme Court appointments as a Poisson distribution.American Journal of Political Science 26: 113–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wermiel, Stephen (1986). Changes on High Court are likely to increase conservatives' clourt.Wall Street Journal, June 18.

  • Witt, Elder, ed. (1981).The Supreme Court and Its Work. Washington D.C.: Congressional Quarterly.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Squire, P. Politics and personal factors in retirement from the United States Supreme Court. Polit Behav 10, 180–190 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991413

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991413

Keywords

Navigation