Skip to main content
Log in

Perceived legitimacy of decision making and academic governance patterns in higher education: A comparative analysis

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This report relates the findings of two parallel studies of campus governance in Pennsylvania institutions. Patterns of decision making were described at six institutions in one study and perceived legitimacy of governance on the part of faculty was assessed on the same campuses. The findings of the studies are related for the purpose of exploring effects of decision issue, institution, and type of institution upon each pattern as well as upon ways in which governance patterns and perceived legitimacy covary. The conclusions suggest modifications in theory and research strategies for future work on the dynamics of campus governance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AAHE-NEA Task Force on Faculty Representation and Academic Negotiations (1967). “Faculty Participation in Academic Governance.” Washington: American Association for Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, G. L. (1963). The organizational character of American colleges and universities. In T. F. Lunsford (ed.), “The Study of Academic Administration.” Boulder, Colo.: Western Interstate Commission on Higher Education, pp. 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arygris, C. (1957). “Personality and Organization.” New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldridge, J. V. (1971). “Power and Conflict in the University.” New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldridge, J. V.; Curtis, D. V.; Ecker, G. P.; and Riley, G. L. (1973). The Impact of institutional size and complexity on faculty autonomy. The Journal of Higher Education, 44:532–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. (1973). “The Organization of Academic Work.” New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie Commission on Higher Education (1973). “Governance of Higher Education: Six Priority Problems.” New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1971). Belief and loyalty in college organization. The Journal of Higher Education, 42:499–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corson, J. J. (1960). “Governance of Colleges and Universities.” New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. A. (1961). “Who Governs: Democracy and Power in an American City.” New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1963). “Modern Political Analysis.” Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, G. W. (1968). “The Distribution of Authority in Formal Organizations.” Boston: Harvard University, Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, L. D. (1974). “Governing the University.” San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunne, M. G. (1974). Distribution of authority and patterns of governance in a sample of state and community colleges in Pennsylvania. Unpublished Ed.D. dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University.

  • Helsabeck, R. E. (1973). “The Compound System: A Conceptual Framework for Effective Decision-Making in Colleges.” Berkeley: Center for Research and Development in Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeton, M. (1971). “Shared Authority on Campus.” Washington: American Association for Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, H. C. (1970). A social-psychological model of political legitimacy and its relevance to black and white student protest movements. Psychiatry, 33:224–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, E. C., Jr., and Lipset, S. M. (1973). “Professors, Unions, and American Higher Education.” Berkeley: Carnegie Commission on Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, D. W. (1973). “Variability in Faculty Perception of the Legitimacy of Decision Making at Nine Pennsylvania Institutions.” University Park: Pennsylvania State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcson, S. (1960). “The Scientist in American Industry.” New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer, K. P., and Leslie, D. W. (1971). “The Academic Senate at The Pennsylvania State University.” University Park: Center for the Study of Higher Education, The Pennsylvania State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer, K. P., and McConnell, T. R. (1970). Faculty participation in university governance. In C. E. Kruytbosch and S. L. Messinger (eds.), “The State of the University: Authority and Change.” Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, pp. 111–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, J. L. (1966). “Fundamentals of Experimental Design.” Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1958). Authority, legitimation, and political action. In C. J. Friedrich (ed.), “Authority.” Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peabody, R. L. (1962). Perceptions of organizational authority: A comparative analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 6:461–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt, G. M., and Parsons, T. (1970). Decision-making in the academic system: Influence and power exchange. In C. E. Kruytbosch and S. L. Messinger (eds.), “The State of the University: Authority and Change.” Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, pp. 133–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presthus, R. V. (1962). Authority in organizations. In S. Mailick and E. H. Van Ness (eds.), “Concepts and Issues in Administrative Behavior.” Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, pp. 122–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statement on government of colleges and universities (1966). Washington: The American Association of University Professors.

  • Wilensky, H. L. (1956). “Intellectuals in Labor Unions.” Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors appreciate helpful comments offered by Professor Marvin Peterson on a draft of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mortimer, K.P., Gunne, M.G. & Leslie, D.W. Perceived legitimacy of decision making and academic governance patterns in higher education: A comparative analysis. Res High Educ 4, 273–290 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991558

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991558

Keywords

Navigation