Abstract
Two studies were conducted to test hypotheses about the relationship of values to action within the context of expectancy-valence theory. In these studies, university students who had previously completed the Rokeach Value Survey answered questionnaires that related to social movement organizations and that contained attitude items, expectancy items, and measures of willingness to assist these organizations. It was predicted that (1) value rankings from the Rokeach Value Survey will be systematically related to attitudes toward social movement organizations; (2) both attitudes and outcome expectancies (subjects' estimates of how helpful their action will be) will be correlated with measures of willingness to act on behalf of an organization; and (3) attitudes and expectancies will jointly account for more of the variance in action measures than either attitudes or expectancies can account for independently. Results showed that hypotheses were consistently supported across two measures of action, two contrasting organizations, hypothetical and actual commitments to act, and two subject samples. These results extend the scope of the expectancy-valence approach by incorporating general values (conceived as motives) into the analysis, and they have practical implications for social movement strategies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research.Psychological Bulletin 1977,84 888–918.
Atkinson, J. W. Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior.Psychological Review 1957,64 359–372.
Atkinson, J. W., & Birch, D.An introduction to motivation. Princeton: Van Nostrand, 1978.
Bagozzi, R. P. Attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A test of some key hypotheses.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1981,41 607–627.
Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychological Review 1977,84 191–215. (a)
Bandura, A.Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1977. (b)
Beach, B. H., & Beach, L. R. Expectancy-based decision schemes: Sidesteps toward applications. In N. T. Feather (Ed.),Expectations and actions: Expectancy-value models in psychology. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum, 1982.
Bentler, P., & Speckart, G. Attitudes “cause” behaviors: A structural equation analysis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1981,40 226–238.
Campbell, A., Gurin, G., & Miller, W. E.The voter decides. Evanston, Illinois: Row, Peterson, 1954.
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P.Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum, 1975.
Edwards, W. The theory of decision making.Psychological Bulletin. 1954,51 380–417.
Ellerman, D. A., & Feather, N. T. The values of Australian student activists.Australian Journal of Education 1976,20 260–277.
Feather, N. T. Subjective probability and decision under uncertainty.Psychological Review 1959,66 150–164.
Feather, N. T.Values in education and society. New York: Free Press, 1975.
Feather, N. T. Value correlates of conservatism.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1979,37 1617–1630. (a)
Feather, N. T. Values, expectancy, and action.Australian Psychologist 1979,14 143–260. (b)
Feather, N. T. The study of values.Journal of Asian-Pacific and World Perspectives 1980,3 3–13. (a)
Feather, N. T. Values in adolescence. In J. Adelson (Ed.),Handbook of adolescent psychology. New York: Wiley, 1980. (b)
Feather, N. T. Actions in relation to expected consequences: An overview of a research program. In N. T. Feather (Ed.),Expectations and actions: Expectancy-value models in psychology. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum, 1982. (a)
Feather, N. T. Expectancy-value approaches: Present status and future directions. In N. T. Feather (Ed.),Expectations and actions: Expectancy-value models in psychology. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum, 1982. (b)
Feather, N. T. (Ed.).Expectations and actions: Expectancy-value models in psychology. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum, 1982. (c)
Feather, N. T. Human values and the prediction of action: An expectancy-valence analysis. In N. T. Feather (Ed.),Expectations and actions: Expectancy-value models in psychology. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum, 1982. (d)
Feather, N. T. Introduction and overview. In N. T. Feather (Ed.),Expectations and actions: Expectancy-value models in psychology. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum, 1982. (e)
Fischoff, B., Goitein, B., & Shapira, Z. The experienced utility of expected utility approaches. In N. T. Feather (Ed.),Expectations and actions: Expectancy-value models in psychology. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum, 1982.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I.Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. On construct validity: A critique of Miniard and Cohen's paper.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1981,17 340–350.
French, J. R. P., Jr., & Kahn, R. L. A programmatic approach to studying the industrial environment and mental health.Journal of Social Issues 1962,18 1–47.
Hays, W. L.Quantification in psychology. Belmont, California: Brooks/Cole, 1967.
Heckhausen, H. Achievement motivation and its constructs: A cognitive model.Motivation and Emotion 1977,1 283–329.
Jaccard, J. Attitudes and behavior: Implications of attitudes toward behavior alternatives.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1981,17 286–307.
Janis, I. L., & Mann, L.Decision making. New York: Free Preśs, 1977.
Lewin, K. The conceptual representation and the measurement of psychological forces.Contributions to Psychological Theory, 1938,1. (Reprinted by Johnson Reprint Corporation, New York.)
Lynch, J. G., Jr., & Cohen, J. L. The use of subjective utility theory as an aid to understanding variables that influence helping behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1978,36 1138–1151.
Milbrath, L. W.Political participation: How and why do people get involved in politics? Chicago: Rand McNally, 1965.
Miniard, P. W., & Cohen, J. B. An examination of the Fishbein-Ajzen behavioral-intentions model's concepts and measures.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1981,17 309–339.
Mischel, W. Toward a cognitive social reconceptualization of personality.Psychological Review 1973,80 252–283.
Mitchell, T. R. Expectancy-value models in organizational psychology. In N. T. Feather (Ed.),Expectations and actions: Expectancy-value models in psychology. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum, 1982.
Paige, J. M. Political orientation and riot participation.American Sociological Review 1971,36 810–820.
Rokeach, M.Beliefs, attitudes, and values: A theory of organization and change.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1968.
Rokeach, M.The nature of human values. New York: Free Press, 1973.
Rokeach, M. (Ed.).Understanding human values: Individual and societal. New York: Free Press, 1979.
Rotter, J. B. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.Psychological Monographs, 1966,80(1, Whole No. 609).
Schuman, H., & Johnson, M. P. Attitudes and behavior.Annual Review of Sociology 1976,2 161–207.
Vroom, V. H.Work and motivation. New York: Wiley, 1964.
Wilson, G. D. (Ed.).The psychology of conservatism. New York: Academic Press, 1973.
Wilson, G. D., & Patterson, J. R. A new measure of conservatism.British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 1968,7 264–269.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of John Mann and John Crosbie in compiling and analyzing the data reported here.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Feather, N.T., Newton, J.W. Values, expectations, and the prediction of social action: An expectancy-valence analysis. Motiv Emot 6, 217–244 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992246
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992246