Skip to main content
Log in

An information theoretic method for classifying patients according to the risk of adverse hospital incidents

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The measure of Mutual Information is used to select, out of a large number of possibly interrelated qualitative patient variables, those that are most related to the probability of occurrence of adverse incidents. The subpopulations defined by the variables selected are grouped according to risk levels while minimizing the loss of information. Results of the application of the method to predict the occurrence of three types of incidents in four hospitals are reported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abramson, N. S., et al., Adverse occurrence in intensive care units,J. Am. Med. Assoc. 244(14):1582–1589, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aronstein Safren, M., and Chapanis, A., A critical study of hospital medication errors, Part II.Hospitals 53:65–66, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barker, K. N., Kimbrough, W. W., and Heller W. M.,A Study of Medication Errors in a Hospital, University of Mississippi, 1968.

  4. Brown, G. C., Medication errors: A case study.Hospitals 53(20):61–62, 65, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cooper, J. B., et al., Preventable anesthesia mishaps.Anesthesiology 49:399–406, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fagin, I. D., and Vita, M., An analysis of 868 inpatient accidents.Hospitals 39:60–65, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kulikowski, E. S., A study of accidents in a hospital.Supervisor Nurse 10(7):44–58, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lee, R. G., Health and safety in hospitals.Med. Sci. Law 19(2):89–103, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Long, G., and Johnson, C., A pilot study for reducing medication errors.QRB 7(4):6–9, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vere, D. W., Errors of complex prescribing.Lancet 1:370, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Miller, P. D.,Special Malpractice Review: 1974 Closed Claims Survey, Insurance Services Office, 1976.

  12. Mirabella, A., Myers, T. I., and Rudov, M. H., Medical malpractice insurance claims files closed in 1970.Appendix to the Report of the Secretary's Commission of Medical Malpractice, U.S. DHEW, Washington, D.C., 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sowka, P. M., ed.,Medical Malpractice Closed Claims 1975–1978, Vol. 2, no. 2, National Association of Insurance Commissioners, 1980.

  14. Westat, Inc.,Medical Malpractice Closed Claim Study—1976, U.S. DHEW, Washington, D.C., 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mills, D. H., ed.,Medical Insurance Feasibility Study, California Medical Association, 1977.

  16. Pocinki, L. S., et al., The incidence of iatrogenic injuries.Appendix to the Report to the Secretary's Commission on Medical Malpractice, U.S. DHEW, Washington, D.C., 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Elnicki, R. A., and Schmitt, J. P., Contribution of patient and hospital characteristics to adverse patient incidents.Health Serv. Res. (Winter): 399–414, 1980.

  18. Andrews, F. M., Morgan, J. N., Sonquest, J. A., and Klen, L.,Multiple Classification Analysis, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bishop, Y. M. M., Fienberg, S. E., and Hollan, P. W.,Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Goodman, L. A.,Analyzing Qualitative Categorical Data, AGT Books, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Goodman, L. A., The analysis of cross-classified data: Independence, quasi-independence and interractions in contingency tables with or without missing entries.J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 63:1091–1131, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shannon, C. E., A mathematical theory of communication.Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27:379, 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Raz, T., and Goldman, J., A grouping algorithm for qualitative data with a dichotomous outcome variable.IIE Transactions 17(2):168–174, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Deming, W. E., and Stephan, F. F., On a least squares adjustment of a sampled frequency table when the expected marginal totals are known.Ann. Math. Stat. 11:427–444, 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Guiasu, S.,Information Theory with Application, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gokhale, D. V., and Kullback, S.,The Information in Contingency Tables, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Good, I. J., Maximum entropy for hypothesis formulation, especially for multidimensional contingency tables.Ann. Math. Stat. 34:911–930, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ku, H. H., and Kullback, S., Interaction in multidimensional contingency tables: An information theoretic approach.J. Res. Nat. Bureau Standards (Sect B) 72:159–199, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raz, T. An information theoretic method for classifying patients according to the risk of adverse hospital incidents. J Med Syst 10, 195–208 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993125

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993125

Keywords

Navigation