Skip to main content
Log in

Integrating the Dirichlet-multinomial and multinomial logit models of brand choice

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses the interpretative benefits that arise from merging the Dirichlet-multinomial (DM) model as a loyalty variable in the multinomial logit (MNL) model of brand choice. The estimated parameters of this hybrid model compare favorably to those of a “pure” DM model (with no marketing mix variables) as well as those of a standard MNL model with an exponentially smoothed loyalty measure. The hybrid model offers an index of consumer heterogeneity and estimates of each brand's “preference share,” adjusted for the effects of price and promotional activities. We illustrate the unique interpretations offered by these parameters across four different product categories, showing how changes in heterogeneity (across categories or model specifications) are closely related to changes in the overall impact of marketing mix variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abe, Makoto, (1991). “A Moving Ellipsoid Method for Nonparametric Regression and Its Application to Logit Diagnostics With Scanner Data,”Journal of Marketing Research 28 (August), 339–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, Chitrabhanu, Peter S. Fader, and Leonard M. Lodish. (1992). “Assessing a Purchase-Based Measure of Brand Loyalty: Share of Category Requirements,” unpublished working paper. Department of Marketing, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.

  • Bucklin, Randolph E., and James M. Lattin, (1991). “A Two-State Model of Purchase Incidence and Brand Choice,”Marketing Science 10 (Winter), 24–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chintagunta, Pradeep K., Dipak C. Jain, and Naufel J. Vilcassim. (1991). “Investigating Heterogeneity in Brand Preferences in Logit Models for Panel Data,”Journal of Marketing Research 28 (November), 417–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elrod, Terry, and Russell S. Winer. (1991). “An Empirical Comparison of Mapping Methods Based on Panel Data,” unpublished working paper.

  • Fader, Peter S., and James M. Lattin. (1993). “Accounting for Heterogeneity and Nonstationarity in a Cross-Sectional Model of Consumer Purchase Behavior,”Marketing Science, 12 (Fall), forthcoming.

  • Fader, Peter S., James M. Lattin, and John D.C. Little. (1992). “Estimating Nonlinear Parameters in the Multinomial Logit Model,”Marketing Science, 11 (Fall), 372–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fader, Peter S., and Leonard M. Lodish. (1990). “A Cross-Category Analysis of Category Structure and Promotional Activity for Grocery Products,”Journal of Marketing 54 (October), 52–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fader, Peter S., and David C. Schmittlein. (1992). “Excess Behavioral Loyalty Experienced by High-Share Brands: Deviations from the Dirichlet Model for Repeat Purchasing,” unpublished working paper, Department of Marketing, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.

  • Goodhardt, G. J., A. S. C. Ehrenberg, and C. Chatfield. (1984). “The Dirichlet: A Comprehensive Model of Buying Behavior,”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 147, 621–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guadagni, Peter M., and John D. C. Little. (1983). “A Logit Model of Brand Choice Calibrated on Scanner Data,”Marketing Science 2 (Summer), 203–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, Sunil. (1988). “The Impact of Sales Promotions on When, What, and How Much to Buy,”Journal of Marketing Research 25 (November), 342–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeuland, Abel P., Frank M. Bass, and Gordon P. Wright. (1980). “A Multibrand Stochastic Model Compounding Heterogeneous Erlang Timing and Multinomial Choice Processes,”Operations Research 28 (March–April), 255–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalwani, Manohar U., Chi Kin Yim, Heikki J. Rinne, and Yoshi Sugita. (1990). “A Price Expectations Model of Customer Brand Choice,”Journal of Marketing Research 27 (August), 251–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalwani, Manohar U., Robert J. Meyer, and Donald G. Morrison. (1992). “The Dirichlet-Multinomial as a Benchmark Chance Criterion for Some Discrete Choice Models,” unpublished working paper.

  • Kannan, P. K., and Gordon, P. Wright. (1991). “Modeling and Testing Structured Markets: A Nested Logit Approach,”Marketing Science 10 (Winter), 58–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, Glenn E., and Russell S. Winer. (1992). “An Empirical Analysis of Internal and External Reference Prices Using Scanner Data,”Journal of Consumer Research 19 (June), 62–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabavala, Darius J., and Donald G. Morrison. (1977). “A Model of TV Show Loyalty,”Journal of Advertising Research 17 (December), 35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabavala, Darius J., and Donald G. Morrison. (1981). “A Nonstationary Model of Binary Choice Applied to Media Exposure,”Management Science 27 (6), 637–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uncles, Mark D. (1989). “BUYER: Buyer Behaviour Software, Version 89.1,” Centre for Marketing and Communication, London Business School.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The author is grateful to Bruce Hardie, Barbara Kahn, Jim Lattin, Len Lodish, Bob Meyer, and Don Morrison for their comments and suggestions. He appreciates the support of Doug Honnold and Information Resources, Inc., for providing the data and computational facilities used in this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fader, P.S. Integrating the Dirichlet-multinomial and multinomial logit models of brand choice. Marketing Letters 4, 99–112 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994069

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994069

Key words

Navigation