Skip to main content
Log in

Double couponing: Pricing and consumer perspectives

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many supermarkets double manufacturer coupens. Are consumers' grocery bills lowered as a result? Our study of two double coupon supermarkets shows that for every ten cents of double-coupon value redeemed, the corresponding shelf price at a double coupon supermarket is higher by an estimated 3.5 cents compared to the price at other supermarkets. Given the higher shelf prices, the data also suggest that the majority of customers do not save money at double coupon stores, and adjust their shopping to account for the retail promotion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bhasin, Ajay, and Roger Dickinson. (1987). “Extra Value Couponing — Strategic Implications for Supermarkets,”Agribusiness 3, 293–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blattberg, Robert, and Scott Neslin. (1990).Sales Promotions: Concepts, Methods and Strategies. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstner, Eitan, and Duncan Holthausen. (1986). “Profitable Pricing When Market Segments Overlap,”Marketing Science 6, Winter, 55–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstner, Eitan, and James Hess. (1987). “Why Do Hot Dogs Come in Packages of 10 and Buns in 8s or 12s? A Demand Side Exploration,”Journal of Business 60 (October), 491–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstner, Eitan, and James Hess. (1991). “A Theory of Channel Price Promotions,”American Economic Review 81 (September), 872–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstner, Eitan, James Hess, and Duncan Holthausen. (1992). “A Price Discrimination Rule for a Channel with Cost-Plus Retailers,” Manuscript, Department of Business Management, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glesjer, H. (1969). “A New Test for Heteroscedasticity,”Journal of the American Statistical Association 64, 316–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan, Trichy, and Ram Rao. (1992). “Retail Pricing in the Presence of Double Couponing,” July, Manuscript, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levedahl, William. (1986). “Profit Maximizing Pricing of Cents off Coupons: Promotion or Price Discrimination?”Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics (Fall), 56–70.

  • Narasimhan, Chakravarthi. (1984). “A Price Discrimination Theory of Coupons,”Marketing Science 3 (Spring), 128–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varadarajan, P. Rajan. (1986). “Double Couponing: The Prisoner's Dilemma in Food Retailing,”Business Forum, Winter, 4–7.

  • Vilcassim, Naufel, and Dick Wittink. (1987). “Supporting a Higher Shelf Price Through Coupon Distribution,”Journal of Consumer Marketing 4 (Spring), 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, Rockney, and Scott MacKenzie. (1988). “A Structural Equations Analysis of the Impact of Price Promotions on Store Performance,”Journal of Marketing Research 25 (February), 51–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCH Promotional Services. (1992).Worldwide Coupon Distribution and Redemption Trends, Vol XVII, p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was completed while Hess was visiting the MIT's Sloan School of Management and he thanks the Marketing Group for providing such a stimulating environment. We both thank Jeongwen Chiang, Wujin Chu, John Hauser, Caroline Henderson, John Little, Scott Neslin, and Birger Wernerfelt for helpful comments and Vicki Ruffin for assistance on data collection.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hess, J.D., Gerstner, E. Double couponing: Pricing and consumer perspectives. Marketing Letters 4, 153–163 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994073

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994073

Key words

Navigation