Abstract
Two studies examined cognitive responses to comparative advertising that was valenced, i.e., was either negative or positive. Negative comparative advertising featured the advertised brand derogating the comparison brand (I'm OK, you're not OK). Positive comparative advertising claimed superiority over the comparison brand in a nonderogatory manner (You're OK, I'm more OK). Subjects were exposed to either a negative comparative ad or a positive comparative ad. In study 1, the ad featured either a high or low share advertised brand and either a high or low share comparison brand while in study 2, the ad featured advertised and comparison brands with either a strong or a weak reputation. Across both studies, it was found that negative comparative advertising evoked significantly higher counterargumentation and lower claim acceptance than its positive counterpart. Also, when the advertised brand had a high share relative to the comparison brand, counterargumentation was lower and claim acceptance was higher vis-a-vis when the advertised brand had a low share relative to the comparison brand. Findings pertaining to brand reputation were mixed. Managerial and future research implications of the findings are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Belch, George E. (1981). “An Examination of Comparative and Noncomparative Television Commercials: The Effect of Claim Variation and Repetition on Cognitive Response and Message Acceptance,”Journal of Marketing Research 18 (August), 333–349.
Buchanan, Bruce. (1985). “Can You Pass the Comparative Ad Challenge?”Harvard Business Review 4 (July–August), 106–113.
Buchanan, Bruce, and Ronald H. Smithies. (1991). “Taste Claims and Their Substantiation,”Journal of Advertising Research 7 (June/July), 19–35.
Cohen, J. (1977).Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Academic Press.
Demirdjian, Z. S. (1983). “Sales Effectiveness of Comparative Advertising: An Experimental Investigation,”Journal of Consumer Research 10 (December), 362–364.
Goodwin, Steven, and Michael Etgar. (1980). “An Experimental Investigation of Comparative Advertising: Impact of Message Appeal, Information Load, and Utility of Product Class,”Journal of Marketing Research 17 (May), 187–202.
Gorn, Gerald J., and Charles B. Weinberg. (1984). “The Impact of Comparative Advertising on Perception and Attitude: Some Positive Findings,”Journal of Consumer Research 11 (September), 719–727.
Kelley, Harold E. (1973). “A Test of the Relationship Between Trait and Causal Attribution,”American Psychologist 107–128.
Keppel, Geoffrey. (1991).Design and Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Maheswaran, Durairaj, and Shelly Chaiken. (1991). “Promoting Systematic Processing in Low-Motivation Settings: Effect of Incongruent Information on Processing and Judgment,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61 (July), 13–25.
Pechmann, Cornelia, and David W. Stewart. (1990). “The Effects of Comparative Advertising on Attention, Memory, and Purchase Intentions,”Journal of Consumer Research 17 (September), 180–191.
Petty, Richard E. (1977). “The Importance of Cognitive Responses in Persuasion.” InAdvances in Consumer Research, vol. 4. William D. Perreault (ed.). Atlanta: Association for Consumer Research, 358–362.
Petty, Richard E., and John T. Cacioppo. (1984). “The Effects of Involvement on Responses to Argument Quantity and Quality: Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46 (January), 69–81.
Pride, W. M., C. W. Lamb, and B. A. Pletcher. (1977). “Are Comparative Advertisements More Informative for Owners of Mentioned Competing Brand Than for Nonowners?”American Marketing Association Proceedings 41, 297–301.
Shimp, Terence A., and David C. Dyer. (1978). “The Effects of Comparative Advertising Mediated by Market Position of Sponsoring Brand,”Journal of Advertising 7 (Summer), 13–19.
Smith, Robert E., and Shelby D. Hunt. (1978). “Attributional Processes and Effects in Promotional Situations,”Journal of Consumer Research 5 (December), 149–158.
Swinyard, William R. (1981). “The Interaction between Comparative Advertising and Copy Claim Variation,”Journal of Marketing Research 18 (May), 175–186.
Wilkie, William L., and Paul Farris. (1975). “Comparison Advertising: Problems and Potential,”Journal of Marketing 39 (October), 7–15.
Wilson, R. Dale, and Aydin Muderrisoglu. (1988), “An Analysis of Cognitive Responses to Comparative Advertising.” InAdvances in Consumer Research, vol. 7. Jerry Olson (ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.
Wright, Peter L. (1973). “The Cognitive Processes Mediating Acceptance of Advertising,”Journal of Marketing Research 10 (February), 53–62.
Zaichkowsky, Judith L. (1985). “Measuring the Involvement Construct,”Journal of Consumer Research 12 (December), 341–355.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jain, S.P. Positive versus negative comparative advertising. Marketing Letters 4, 309–320 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994350
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994350