Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of risk and competition on choice of innovations

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This exploratory study examines the roles of uncertainty and attitude toward risk in the adoption process of innovations under different competitive conditions. Hypotheses are tested across simulated competitive environments, utilizing a fractional factorial experimental design. The results demonstrate that the roles of the perceived value of the innovation and of uncertainty depend on the competitive environment facing the manager.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abernathy, William J. and James M. Utterback. (1978). “Patterns of Industrial Innovations,”Technological Review 80 (June/July), 41–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, Paul S. (1983). “Technology Strategy. A Guide to the Literatures,”Research in Technological Innovation, Management and Policy 4, 25–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldridge, J. Victor and Robert A. Burnham. (1975). “Organizational Innovation: Individual, Organizational, and Environmental Impacts,”Administrative Science Quarterly 20 (June), 165–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capon, Noel and Rashi Glazer. (1987). “Marketing and Technology: A Strategic Coalignment,”Journal of Marketing 51 (July), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, Rabikar and Jehoshua Eliashberg. (1990). “The Innovation Diffusion Process in a Heterogeneous Population. A Micromodeling Approach,”Management Science 36, 9 (September), 1057–1079.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, Rabikar, Jehoshua Eliashberg, Hubert Gatignon, and Leonard M. Lodish. (1988). “A Practical Bayesian Approach to Selection of Optimal Market Testing Strategies,”Journal of Marketing Research 25, 4 (November), 363–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conor, W. S. and S. Young. (1961). “Fractional Factorial Designs for Experiments with Factors at Two and Three Levels,” National Bureau of Standards, Applied Mathematics Series 58.

  • Downey, H. K., D. Hellriegel and J. W. Slocum. (1975). “Environmental Uncertainty: The Construct and Its Applications,”Administrative Science Quarterly 20, 613–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, R. B. (1972). “Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty,”Administrative Science Quarterly 17, 313–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliashberg, Jehoshua. (1981). “An Investigation of Competitive Preference Structures and Posterior Performance Through a Bayesian Decision-Theoretic Approach,”Management Science 27, 7 (July), 785–801.

    Google Scholar 

  • and John R. Hauser. (1985). “A Measurement Error Approach for Modeling Consumer Risk Preference,”Management Science 31, 1 (January), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettlie, John C. (1983). “Organizational Policy and Innovation Among Suppliers to the Food Processing Sector,”Academy of Management Journal 26, 1, 27–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • and William P. Bridges. (1982). “Environmental Uncertainty and Organizational Technology Policy,”IEEE Trans. Engineering Management EM-29, 2–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feder, Gershon and Gerald T. O'Mara. (1982). “On Information and Innovation Diffusion: A Bayesian Approach,”American Journal of Agricultural Economics (February), 145–147.

  • Gatignon, Hubert. (1984). “Toward a Methodology for Measuring Advertising Copy Effects,”Marketing Science 3, 4 (Fall), 308–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • , and Thomas S. Robertson. (1989). “Technology Diffusion: An Empirical Test of Competitive Effects,”Journal of Marketing 53, 1 (January), 35–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, Richard. (1982). “Adoption and Diffusion of an Innovation of Uncertain Profitability,”Journal of Economic Theory 27, 1, 182–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, Ralph L. (1982). “Utility Functions for Multiattributed Consequences,”Management Science 18, 276–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerin, Roger, A. P. Rajan Varadarajan, and Robert A. Peterson. (1992). “First-Mover Advantage: A Synthesis, Conceptual Framework, and Research Propositions,”Journal of Marketing 56 (October), 33–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimberly, John R. (1981). “Managerial Innovation.” In P. C. Nystrom and W. H. Starbuck (eds.),Handbook of Organizational Design. New York: Oxford University Press, 84–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • and Michael J. Evansiko. (1981). “Organizational Innovation: The Influence of Individual, Organizational, and Contextual Factors on Hospital Adoption of Technological and Administrative Innovations,”Academy of Management Journal 24 (December), 689–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, Alfie. (1992).No Contest: The Case Against Competition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotabe, Masaaki. (1990). “Corporate Product Policy and Innovative Behavior of European and Japanese Multinationals: An Empirical Investigation,”Journal of Marketing 51 (April), 19–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamer, John W. and Kevin F. McCardle. (1987). “Uncertainty, Competition, and the Adoption of New Technology,”Management Science 33, 2 (February), 161–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milliken, Frances J. (1987). “Three Types of Perceived Uncertainty About the Environment: State, Effect, and Response Uncertainty,”Academy of Management Review 12, 1, 133–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, Marvin B. and David B. Montgomery. (1990). “Strategy of Market Entry: To Pioneer or Follow?” InHandbook of Business Strategy 2nd ed., Harold E. Glas (ed.), New York: Warren, Gorham and Lamont, 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCardle, Kevin F. (1985). “Information Acquisition and the Adoption of New Technology,”Management Science 31, 11 (November), 1372–1389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, Robert J. and Arvind Sathi. (1985). “A Multiattribute Model of Consumer Choice During Product Learning,”Marketing Science 4, 1 (Winter), 41–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philips, Lynn W., Dae R. Chang, and Robert D. Buzzell. (1983). “Product Quality, Cost Position and Business Performance: A Test of Some Key Hypotheses,”Journal of Marketing 47, 2 (Spring), 26–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Michael E. (1985).Competitive Advantage, New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • (1980).Competitive Strategy, New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • (1979). “How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy,”Harvard Business Review 57 (March–April), 137–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. H. and G. L. Urban. (1988). “Modeling Multiattribute Utility, Risk, and Belief Dynamics for New Consumer Durable Brand Choice,”Management Science 34, 2 (February), 167–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, Thomas S. and Hubert Gatignon. (1986). “Competitive Effects on Technology Diffusion,”Journal of Marketing 50 (July), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, Frederick M. (1980).Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. 2nd ed. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1950).Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoneman, P. (1981). “Intra-Firm Diffusion, Bayesian Learning and Profitability,”The Economic Journal 91 (June), 375–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. D. (1967).Organizations in Action. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Neumann, John and Oscar Morgenstern. (1947).Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff, Robert B. (1972). “Measurement of Consumer's Prior Brand Information,”Journal of Marketing Research 9, 3 (August), 258–263.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The assistance of Kristiaan Helsen and Douglas Bowman in data analysis is deeply appreciated, as well as the comments of Peter Fader and Robert Meyer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gatignon, H., Robertson, T.S. The impact of risk and competition on choice of innovations. Market Lett 4, 191–204 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999226

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999226

Key words

Navigation