Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring the reach and frequency elasticities of advertising media

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study describes a general approach for measuring the elasticities and cross-elasticities of reach and frequency of advertising media schedules. The approach involves the approximation of a complex model, which combines logit choice behavior and stochastic model components, by means of a surface response methodology method. Using single-source UPC scanner data for an actual market situation, the paper highlights the steps for implementing the approach within a market environment that is characterized by asymmetric competitive advertising media effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Batra, R., W. R. VanHonacker, and D. Kim. (1989). “Effects of Advertising on Brand Purchases: Some Results from Single-Source Data.” Paper presented at the ORSA/TIMS Marketing Science Conference, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.

  • Box, G. E. P., W. G. Hunter, and J. S. Hunter. (1978).Statistics for Experimenters New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, G. S. and D. R. A. Lehmann. (1985). “Model of Marketing Mix, Brand Switching and Competition,”Journal of Marketing Research 22 (August), 318–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, G. S., L. G. Cooper, D. M. Hanssens, and D. F. Midgley. (1988). “Modeling Asymmetric Competition,”Marketing Science 7, 4 (Fall), 393–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chattfield, C. and G. J. A. Goodhardt. (1973). “Consumer Purchase Model with Erlang Inter-Purchasing Times,”Journal of the American Statistical Association 68, 828–835.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, L. G. (1988). “Competitive Maps: The Structure Underlying Asymmetric Cross Elasticities,”Management Science 34, 6 (June), 707–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, L. G. and M. Nakanishi. (1988). “Market Share Analysis: Competitive Marketing Effectiveness.” Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deighton, J., C. Henderson, and S. Neslin. (1988). “Advertising Framing Effects in Field Data.” Working Paper, Amos Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth College.

  • Ehrenberg, A. S. C. (1959). “The Pattern of Consumer Purchases.”Applied Statistics 8, 26–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodhardt, G. S., A. S. C. Ehrenberg, and C. Chattfield. (1984). “The Dirichlet Model — A Model of Buying Behavior,”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 147, Part 5, 621–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. E., J. D. Carrol, and S. M. A. Goldberg. (1981). “General Approach to Product Design Optimization via Conjoint Analysis,”Journal of Marketing 45, 3 (Summer), 17–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBride, R. D. and F. S. Zufryden. (1988). “An Integer Programming Approach to the Optimal Product Line Selection Problem,”Marketing Science 7, 2 (Spring), 126–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakanishi, M. and L. G. Cooper. (1974). “Parameter Estimation for a Multiplicative Competitive Interaction Model — A Least Squares Approach,”Journal of Marketing Research 11 (August), 303–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedrick, J. H. and F. S. Zufryden. (1991). “Evaluating the Impact of Advertising Media Plans: A Model of Consumer Purchase Dynamics Using Single-Source Data,”Marketing Science 10, 2 (Spring), 111, 130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedrick, J. H. and F. S. Zufryden. (1992). “Measuring the Competitive Effects of Advertising Media Plans,” Working Paper, Graduate School of Business, University of Southern California.

  • Russel, G. J. and R. S. Winer. (1989). “Uncovering the Determinants of the Lagged Impact of Advertising: Consumption Feedback Versus Advertising Carry-Over.” Paper presented at the ORSA/TIMS Marketing Science Conference, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.

  • Tellis, G. J. (1988). “Advertising Exposures, Loyalty and Brand Purchase: A Two-Stage Model of Choice,”Journal of Marketing Research 25 (May), 134–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zufryden, F. S. (1986a). “A Dynamic Programming Approach for Product Selection and Supermarket Shelf-Space Allocation,”Journal of the Operational Research Society 7, 413–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zufryden, F. S. (1986b). “Multibrand Transition Probabilities as a Function of Explanatory Variables: Estimation by a Least-Squares-Based Approach,”Journal of Marketing Research 23 (May), 177–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zufryden, F. S. (1987). “A Model for Relating Advertising Media Exposures to Purchase Incidence Behavior Patterns,”Management Science 33, 10 (October), 1253–1266.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zufryden, F.S., Pedrick, J.H. Measuring the reach and frequency elasticities of advertising media. Market Lett 4, 215–225 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999228

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999228

Keywords

Navigation