Abstract
Hobson and Chang recommend that the Kullback information measure replace the Shannon information measure as a basis for information theory. They cite several items in support of their proposal. The items are considered individually and it is shown that they do not in fact constitute sufficient reasons for accepting the Hobson/Chang proposal. It is concluded that the Shannon information measure should be retained as the basis of information theory.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. Hobson and B. Chang,J. Stat. Phys. 7(4):301 (1973).
M. Tribus,Rational Descriptions, Decisions and Designs, Pergamon, New York (1969).
M. Tribus,J. Appl. Mech.,1961 (March):1–8.
M. Tribus and R. Evans,App. Mech. Rev. 16(10):765–769 (1963).
M. Tribus, P. Shannon, and R. Evans,AIChE J. 1966 (March):244–248.
M. Tribus,Am. Scientist 54(2) (1966).
E. T. Jaynes,Phys. Rev. 106:620–630 (1957);108:171–190 (1957).
S. Wilks,Mathematical Statistics, Wiley, New York (1962).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tribus, M., Rossi, R. On the Kullback information measure as a basis for information theory: Comments on a proposal by Hobson and Chang. J Stat Phys 9, 331–338 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01012165
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01012165