Abstract
Claims Examiners are critical for the profitability of large insurance companies. Mistakes in hiring these people can result in improperly processed claims and/or turnover, and this yields negative financial consequences for the company. This paper describes research evaluating the validity of selection procedures for the position of claims examiner at Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Oklahoma. A job analysis indicated that both cognitive skills and personal abilities are necessary for successful performance as a claims examiner. The job analysis also indicated that both subjective and objective criterion measures reflect important aspects of job performance. The criterion data included nine supervisory ratings, employee nominations, average percent of performance, absences, disciplinary actions, and sick leave. In a concurrent validation strategy, we tested a sample of experienced incumbents (N=50) using four cognitive ability tests (Basic Skills Tests: BST) and two measures of personality (Hogan Personality Inventory and PROFILE). Scales from two personality inventories were combined to form the Claims Examiner Inventory (CEI). Scores from the CEI and three of the four cognitive tests correlated significantly with the average percent of performance and six of the supervisory ratings, including the average supervisory rating. In addition to the cognitive measures, the personality measure contributed significantly to the prediction of percent of performance achieved with R=.64. These results are consistent with other research findings that support the use of both personality and cognitive measures as predictors of job performance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bernardin, H.J., & Bownas, D.A. (Eds.). (1985).Personality assessment in organizations. New York: Praeger.
Brogden, H. (1949). When testing pays off.Personnel Psychology, 2, 171–185.
Cascio, W.F. (1982).Costing human resources: The financial impact of behavior in organizations. Boston: Kent Publishing.
Cronbach, L., & Gleser, G. (1965).Psychological tests and personnel decisions. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Day, D.V. & Silverman, S.B. (1989). Personality and job performance: Evidence of incremental validity.Personnel Psychology, 42, 25–36.
Digman, J.M., & Inouye, J. (1986). Further specification of the five robust factors of personality.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 116–123.
Ghiselli, E.E. (1966).The validity of occupational aptitude tests. New York: Wiley.
Goldberg, L.R. (1982). From ace to zombie: Some explorations in the language of personality. In C.D. Spielberger & J.N. Butcher (Eds.),Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 1, pp. 203–234). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gough, H.G. (1984). A managerial potential scale for the California Psychological Inventory.Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 233–240.
Gough, H.G. (1985). A work orintation scale for the California Psychological Inventory.Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 505–513.
Guion, R.M. (1987). Changing views for personnel selection research.Personnel Psychology, 40, 199–213.
Harman, H.H. (1976). Modern factor analysis (3rd ed. rev.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Hogan, J., & Hogan, R. (1986).Hogan personnel selection series manual. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.
Hogan, J., & Hogan, R. (1989). How to measure employee reliability.Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 273–279.
Hogan, J., Hogan, R., & Busch, C.M. (1984). How to measure service orientation.Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 167–173.
Hogan, R. (1983). A socioanalytic theory of personality. In M. Page (Ed.),Nebraska symposium on motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 55–89.
Hogan, R. (1986).Users manual for the Hogan Personality Inventory. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.
Hogan, R., Carpenter, B.N., Briggs, S.R., & Hansson, R.O. (1985). Personality assessment and personnel selection. In H.J. Bernardin & D.A. Bownas (Eds.),Personality assessment in organizations, (pp. 21–52). New York: Praeger.
Hough, L., & Ashworth, S.D. (1987, April).Predicting soldier performance: Assessment of temperament constructs as predictors of job performance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society of Industrial/Organizational Psychologists, Atlanta, GA.
Hunter, J.E., & Hunter, R.F. (1984). Validity and utility of employment tests by race: A comprehensive review and analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 96, 72–98.
Hunter, J.E., & Schmidt, F.L. (1983). Quantifying the effects of psychological interventions on employee job performance and work-force productivity.American Psychologist, 38, 473–478.
Jones, W.H. (1990).User's manual for PROFILE. Tulsa, OK: Hogan Assessment Systems.
Lifton, P.D., & Nannis, E.D. (1988). Hogan Personality Inventory and Hogan Personnel Selection Series. In D.J. Keyser & R.C. Sweetland (Eds.),Test Critiques, VI. (pp. 216–225). Kansas City: Test Corporation of America.
Pearlman, K. (1979).The validity of tests used to select clerical personnel: A comprehensive summary and evaluation. (TS-79-1) Washington, DC: Personnel Research and Development Center, U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Ruch, W.W., Shub, A.N., Moinat, S.M., & Dye, D.A. (1982).Administrator's guide: PSI Basic Skills Tests for Business, Industry, and Government. Los Angeles: Psychological Services, Inc.
Ruch, W.W., Weiner, J.A., McKillip, R.H., & Dye, D.A. (1985).Technical manual: PSI Basic Skills Tests for Business, Industry, and Government. Los Angeles: Psychological Services, Inc.
Tupes, E.C., & Christal, R.E. (1961). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings.Aeronautical Systems Division Technical Report, 61–97, Lackland Airforce Base, Texas.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arneson, S., Millikin-Davies, M. & Hogan, J. Validation of personality and cognitive measures for insurance claims examiners. J Bus Psychol 7, 459–473 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01013759
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01013759