Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Overt sexuality in advertising: A discourse analysis of gender responses

  • Published:
Journal of Consumer Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent developments in advertising imagery often involve the use of overt sexuality. Consumer responses to advertisements using a range of sexual explicitness are explored using a discourse analytic approach. The dominant negative themes articulated across sex and age groups concerned the use of sex-role stereotypes and the objectification of women. Dominant positive themes shared by both sexes involved equality in sexual representations and sexuality as art. Younger consumers' discourse concerned how advertising can add symbolic value to consumption by investing the products with a romantic style of sexuality which becomes a potent cultural form drawing its energy from the desires of the body. The shared dominant themes were supported by gendered interpretive repertoires. The unexpected gender consistency in dominant themes is discussed in relation to the cultural function of advertising as art in allowing women to speak more easily of their desires through consumption choices.

Zusammenfassung

Offene Darstellung von Sexualität in der Werbung: Diskursanalyse geschlechtstypischer Reaktionen Die neuere Entwicklung werblicher Darstellungsformen ist gekennzeichnet durch hÄufigere Darstellung von Sexualität. Konsumentenreaktionen auf Werbeanzeigen mit variierender sexueller Deutlichkeit werden mit Hilfe eines diskursanalytischen Ansatzes untersucht. Dominante negative Themen, die bei beiden Geschlechtern und quer durch alle Altersgruppen zur Sprache kamen, betrafen die Verwendung von Geschlechterstereotypen und die Darstellung von Frauen als Objekten. Dominante positive Themen, die ebenfalls von beiden Geschlechtern genannt werden, sind die Gleichrangigkeit der Darstellung der Geschlechter und die Darstellung der Sexualität in künstlerischer Form. Jüngere Konsumenten beschÄftigten sich mit der Frage, wie Werbung den Konsum mit symbolischem Wert anreichern kann dadurch, da\ den Produkten eine romantische Sexualität angeheftet wird. Die eigentlich nicht erwartete übereinstimmung beider Geschlechter bei den dominanten Themen wird im Zusammenhang mit der kulturellen Funktion von Werbung als neue Kunstform diskutiert, die es Frauen erlaubt, ihre Bedürfnisse leichter durch Konsumakte zu Äu\ern.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adorno, T. W. (1984).Aesthetic theory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barak, B., & Schiffman, L. G. (1981). Cognitive age: A nonchronological age variable. In: K. B. Monroe (Ed.),Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 8, pp. 602–606. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1991).Modernity and ambivalence. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bocock, R. (1993).Consumption. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boddewyn, J. (1991). Controlling sex and decency in advertising around the world.Journal of Advertising, 20(4), 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bologh, R. (1990).Love or greatness. London: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984).Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burman, E. (1991). What discourse is not.Philosophical Psychology, 4, 325–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1993). The body politics of Julia Kristeva. In: K. Oliver (Ed.),Ethics, politics, and difference in Julia Kristeva's writings, pp. 164–178. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallmayr, F. (1991).Life-world, modernity and critique: Paths between Heidegger and the Frankfurt school. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, M. (1992).The consumerist manifesto: Advertising in postmodern times. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1977).Anti-Oedipus, capitalism and schizophrenia. New York: Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dishman, P. (1993). A survey of nudity in advertising and offensiveness responses with regard to gender. In: J. Arnold Costa (Ed.),Gender and consumer behavior, Vol. 2, pp. 164–170. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Printing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagleton, T. (1983).Linguistic theory. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992).Discursive psychology. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, R. (1993). Gender and the psychological meaning of brands. In: J. Arnold Costa (Ed.),Gender and consumer behavior, Vol. 2, pp. 99–105. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Printing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, R., Eccles S., & Hodgson, M. (1993). Recoding gender representations: Women, cleaning products, and advertising's “new man.”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 10, 311–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, R., & Ritson, M. (1995). Practicing existential consumption: The lived meaning of sexuality in advertising. In: F. R. Kardes & M. Sujan (Eds.)Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 22. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, M. (1991).Consumer culture and postmodernism. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flick, J. (1987). Advertising manipulates women's lib. In: Umiker-Seboek (Ed.),Marketing and semiotics: New directions in the study of signs for sale, pp. 532–542. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1981).The history of sexuality, Vol. 1: An introduction. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1983). Art as a cultural system. In: C. Geertz (Ed.),Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology, pp. 94–120. London: Fontana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1991).Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1992).The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1979).Gender advertisements. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. (1992). The production, marketing and consumption of sexually explicit material in our sexually conflicted society: A public policy dilemma.Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 11, 135–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. (1994). Sexuality and ethics in advertising: A research agenda and public policy guideline perspective.Journal of Advertising, 23(3), 73–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, J. (1984).Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, R., & Kress, G. (1988).Social semiotics. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irigary, L. (1985).Speculum of the other woman. New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irigary, L. (1991). The three genres. In: M. Whitford (Ed.),The Irigary reader, pp. 140–154. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristeva, J. (1980).Desire in language, a semiotic approach to literature and art. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. (1977).Ecrits: A selection. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lannon, J., & Cooper, P. (1983). Humanistic advertising: A holistic cultural perspective.International Journal of Advertising, 2, 195–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, D. R. (1989).Market research and analysis. Boston: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, S. (1983).Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCannell, D. (1987). “Sex sells”: Comment on gender images and myth in advertising. In: J. Umiker-Sebeok (Ed.),Marketing and semiotics: New directions in the study of signs for sale, pp. 521–531. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, H., & Wetherall, M. (1989). Talking about career and gender identities: A discourse analysis perspective. In: S. Skevington & D. Baker (Eds.),The social identity of women, pp. 67–98. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinlay, A., Potter, J., & Wetherall, M. (1993). Discourse analysis and social representations. In: G. M. Breakwell & D. C. Canter (Eds.),Empirical approaches to social representations, pp. 134–156. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mick, D. G. (1986). Consumer research and semiotics: Exploring the morphology of signs, symbols, and significance.Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 196–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mick, D. G., & Buhl, C. (1992). A meaning-based model of advertising experiences.Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 317–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mick, D. G., & Politi, L. G. (1989). Consumers' interpretations of advertising imagery: A visit to the hell of connotation. In: E. C. Hirschman (Ed.),Interpretative consumer research, pp. 85–96. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, K. (1987). Towards a feminist erotica. In: H. Robinson (Ed.),Visibly female: Feminism and art, pp. 204–217. London: Camden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicosia, F. M., & Mayer, R. N. (1976). Toward a sociology of consumption.Journal of Consumer Research, 3, 65–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, I. (1992).Discourse dynamics: Critical analysis for social and individual psychology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollay, R. W. (1986). The distorted mirror: Reflections on the unintended consequences of advertising.Journal of Marketing, 50(2), 18–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, G. (1988).Vision and difference: Femininity, feminism and the histories of art. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J., & Wetherall, M. (1987).Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J., Wetherall, M., Gill, R., & Edwards, D. (1990). Discourse: Noun, verb or social practice?Philosophical Psychology, 3, 205–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radway, J. A. (1984).Reading the romance: Women, patriarchy, and popular literature. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, J. (1990). Tainted love: The influence of male homosexuality and sexual divergence on pop music and culture since the war. In: A. Tomlinson (Ed.),Consumption identity and style: Marketing, meanings, and the packaging of pleasure, pp. 153–171. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schudson, M. (1984).Advertising, the uneasy persuasion: Its dubious impact on American society. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sciglimpaglia, D., Belch, M., & Cain, R. (1979). Demographic and cognitive factors influencing viewers' evaluation of “sexy” advertisements. In: W. L. Wilkie (Ed.),Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 7, pp. 62–65. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, L. M. (1992). Playing with pictures: Postmodernism, poststructuralism, and advertising visuals. In: J. F. Sherry & B. Sternthal (Eds.),Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 19, pp. 596–612. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidler, V. (1991).The moral limits of modernity: Love, inequality and oppression. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherry, J. F. (1990). Postmodern alternatives: The interpretive turn in consumer research. In: H. Kassarjiian & T. Robertson (Eds.),Handbook of consumer theory and research, pp. 548–591. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snitow, A. (1978). Mass market romance: Pornography for women is different.Radical History Review, 29, 245–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, B. (1989). Literary criticism and consumer research: Overview and illustrative analysis.Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 322–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, B. (1991). Two pornographies: A feminist view of sex in advertising. In: R. H. Holman & M. R. Solomon (Eds.),Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 18, pp. 384–391. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, B. (1993). Feminist thought: Implications for consumer research.Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 518–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D. (1990).You just don't understand: Men and women in conversation. London: Virago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C., Locander, W., & Pollio, H. (1989). Putting consumer experience back into consumer research: The philosophy and method of existential phenomenology.Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 133–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, B., Kramerae, C., & Henley, N. (1983). Language gender and society: Opening a second decade of research. In: B. Thorne, C. Kramerae, & N. Henley (Eds.),Language, gender and society, pp. 1–17. Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinkham, S., & Reid, L. (1988). Sex appeal in advertising revisited: Validation of a typology. In: J. Leckenby (Ed.),Proceedings of the 1988 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising, pp. 121–126. Austin, TX: American Academy of Advertising.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, T. A. (Ed.) (1985).Discourse and communication: New approaches to the analysis of mass media discourse and communication. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vance, C. (1989).Pleasure and danger: Towards a politics of sexuality. London: Pandora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernick, A. (1991).Promotional culture: Advertising, ideology and symbolic expression. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherall, M. (1986). Linguistic repertoires and literary criticism: New directions for a social psychology of gender. In: S. Wilkinson (Ed.),Feminist social psychology: Developing theory and practice, pp. 170–196. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherall, M., Stiven, H., & Potter, J. (1987). Unequal egalitarianism: A preliminary study of discourse concerning gender and employment opportunities.British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 59–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. (1990).Hard core: Power, pleasure, and the “frenzy of the visible.” London: Pandora Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1962). Advertising: The magic system. In: R. Williams (Ed.),Problems in materialism and culture, pp. 170–196. London: New Left Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, J. (1978).Decoding advertisements: Ideology and meaning in advertising. London: Marion Boyars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, J. (1986).Consuming passions: The dynamics of popular culture. London: Marion Boyars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, P. (1990).Common culture. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Management School, Lancaster University, LA1 4YX, Lancaster, UK

    Richard Elliott (Senior Lecturer in Marketing), Abigail Jones (Research Associates), Andrew Benfield (Research Associates) & Matt Barlow (Research Associates)

Authors
  1. Richard Elliott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abigail Jones
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andrew Benfield
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Matt Barlow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Elliott, R., Jones, A., Benfield, A. et al. Overt sexuality in advertising: A discourse analysis of gender responses. J Consum Policy 18, 187–217 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01016511

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01016511

Keywords

Search

Navigation