Skip to main content
Log in

A prospective study of the relationship between phonological, semantic and syntactic skills and specific reading disability

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although it is well established that a relationship exists between specific reading disability and spoken language difficulties, the nature of that relationship remains controversial. In the study reported here, the performance of poor readers was firstly compared with that of matched good readers on a series of spoken and written language tasks on three assessment trials 12 months apart, and secondly to that of younger average readers. Five experimental tasks were used to measure the readers' phonological processing skills, and three subtests from the CELF-R were selected to measure the students' syntactic and semantic skills. Reading accuracy and comprehension ability were assessed by the Neale Analysis of Reading Ability-Revised. The results showed that 8–10-year-old poor readers performed poorly in all three linguistic areas concurrently, and that these difficulties persisted. However, the important finding from this study was that while the good readers demonstrated no significant difference between their phonological processing skills and their semantic/syntactic skills, the poor readers' ability did differ according to skill area. The poor readers' phonological processing skills appeared to be particularly impaired, a finding which was further enhanced by results from the reading-match comparison. The results are discussed in terms of current theories of reading disability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaron P., Olsen J. & Baker C. (1985). The dyslexic college student: Is he also dysphasic?,Cognitive Neuropsychology 2: 115–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop D. (1991). Developmental reading disabilities: The role of phonological processing has been over emphasised,Mind and Language 6: 97–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowey J. (1986). Syntactic awareness in relation to reading skills and on-going reading comprehension monitoring,Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 41: 282–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown L., Sherbenou R. & Johnsen S. (1990).Test of nonverbal intelligence: A language-free measure of cognitive ability, 2nd ed. Austin: Pro-ed.

  • Campbell R. (1991). The importance of special cases: or how the deaf might be, but are not, phonological dyslexics,Mind and Language 6: 107–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catts H. (1991). Facilitating phonological awareness: role of speech-language pathologist,Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 22: 196–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clay M. (1991).Becoming literate: The construction of inner control. Auckland: Heinemann Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart M. (1991). Phonological abilities and reading disabilities,Mind and Language 6: 93–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Gelder B. & Vroomen J. (1991). Phonological deficits: a source of asymmetries between developmental and acquired dyslexia,Mind and Language 6: 125–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denckla M. & Rudel R. (1976). Rapid automatized naming (RAN): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities,Neuropsychologia 14: 471–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodd B., Sprainger N. & Oerlemans M. (1989). The phonological skills of spelling disordered children,Reading and Writing 1: 333–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dundas V. & Strong G. (1989).Readers writers and parents learning together. Brisbane: Stroodum Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn L. & Dunn L. (1981).Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Minnesota: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis N. & Large B. (1987). The development of reading: as you seek so shall you find,British Journal of Psychology 78: 1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Feller W. (1968).An introduction to probability theory and its application. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finucci J. (1986). Follow up studies of developmental dyslexia and other learning disabilities. In S. D. Smith (ed.),Genetics and learning disabilities (pp. 97–120). London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall W., White T. & Guthrie L. (1986). Skilled reading in language development: Some key issues. In J. Orasanu (ed.),Reading comprehension from research to practice (pp. 89–111). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huberty C. (1984). Issues in the use and interpretation of discriminant analysis,Psychological Bulletin 95: 156–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulme C. & Snowling M. (1991). Deficits in output phonology cause developmental phonological dyslexia,Mind and Language 6: 130–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz R. (1986). Phonological deficiencies in children with reading disability: Evidence from an object naming task,Cognition 22: 225–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamhi A. (1992). Response to historical perspective: A developmental language perspective,Journal of Learning Disabilities 25: 48–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenchner O., Gerber M. & Routh D. (1990). Phonological awareness tasks as predictors of decoding ability: Beyond segmentation,Journal of Learning Disabilities 23: 240–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg I., Olofsson A. & Wall S. (1980). Reading and spelling skills in the first years predicted from phonemic awareness skills in kindergarten,Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 21: 159–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manis F., Szeszulski P., Holt L. & Graves K. (1990). Variation in component word recognition and spelling skills among dyslexic children and normal readers. In T. Carr & B. Levy (eds.),Reading and its development (pp. 207–259). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann V., Cowin E. & Schoenheimer J. (1989). Phonological processing, language comprehension and reading ability,Journal of Learning Disabilities 22: 76–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann V. & Ditunno P. (1990). Phonological deficiencies: Effective predictors of future reading problems,Perspectives on Dyslexia 2: 131–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann V., Shankweiler D. & Smith S. (1984). The association between comprehension of spoken sentences and early reading ability: the role of phonetic representation,Journal of Child Language 12: 627–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale M. (1988).Neale Analysis of Reading Ability-Revised. Hawthorn: Australian Council for Educational Research Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcomer P. & Magee P. (1977). The performance of learning (reading) disabled children on a test of spoken language,The Reading Teacher 30: 896–900.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978).Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perin D. (1983). Phonemic segmentation and spelling,British Journal of Psychology 74: 9–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinovitch, R. (1959). Reading and learning disabilities. In S. Arieti (ed.),American handbook of psychiatry. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rack J., Snowling M. & Olsen R. (1992). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: A review,Reading Research Quarterly 27: 29–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth F. & Spekman N. (1989). The oral syntactic proficiency of learning disabled students: a spontaneous story sampling analysis,Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 32: 67–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarborough H. (1990). Very early language deficits in dyslexic children,Child Development 61: 1728–1743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankweiler D., Crain S., Brady S. & Macaruso P. (1992). Identifying the causes of reading disability. In P. Gough, L. Ehr & R. Treiman (eds.),Reading acquisition (pp. 275–305), New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semel E., Wiig E. & Secord W. (1987).Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals — Revised. Examiners Manual. Psychological Corporation.

  • Stanovich K. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency,Reading Research Quarterly 16: 32–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich K. (1985). Explaining the variance in reading ability in terms of psychological processes: What have we learned?,Annals of Dyslexia 35: 67–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F. (1977). Alternative conceptualizations of dyslexia: Evidence in support of a verbal deficit hypothesis,Harvard Educational Review 47: 334–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino F. & Scanlon M. (1987). Phonological coding, phonological awareness, and reading ability: Evidence from a longitudinal and experimental study,Merrill Palmer Quarterly 33: 321–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel S. (1974). Syntactic abilities in normal and dyslexic children,Journal of Learning Disabilities 7: 103–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner R. & Torgesen J. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills,Psychological Bulletin 101: 192–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiig E. & Semel M. (1984).Language assessment and intervention for the learning disabled, 2nd ed. Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson L. (1987)SYSTAT: The System for Statistics. Evanston, IL: Systat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zubrick A. (1991) Oral language development in the school years,Australian Journal of Reading 14: 317–325.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gillon, G., Dodd, B.J. A prospective study of the relationship between phonological, semantic and syntactic skills and specific reading disability. Read Writ 6, 321–345 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01028847

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01028847

Key words

Navigation