Abstract
Although theories of political economy state that citizens' concerns about economic outcomes are important determinants of their political responses, an alternative perspective states that concerns about economic justice influence political responses. Survey data were examined to determine the relative influence of each of these factors on political evaluations and behaviors. Concerns about the justice of the procedures used by the government to make decisions about the distribution of benefits and services strongly predicted evaluations of President Reagan and participation in policy-related political behavior, and were weakly related to general political activism. Concerns about the justice of the distributions of economic benefits were related to evaluations of President Reagan but not to political activism. Judgments about personal economic gain or loss relative to the past predicted evaluations of President Reagan while global subjective judgments of present economic outcomes weakly predicted policy-related political activism. The effect of justice is explained by considering the relationship between citizens' concerns about economic justice and values associated with the American political culture.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, J.S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 9, Academic Press, New York.
Aldrich, J. H., and Nelson, F. D. (1984).Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
Becker, G. S. (1976).The Economic Approach to Human Behavior, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Bentham, J. (1879).An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, The Clarendon Press, Oxford, England.
Berscheid, E., and Campbell, B. (1981). The changing longevity of heterosexual close relationships: A commentary and forecast. In Lerner, M., and Lerner, S. (eds.),The Justice Motive in Social Behavior: Adapting to Times of Scarcity and Change, Plenum Press, New York.
Bierhoff, H. W., Cohen, R. L., and Greenberg, J. (1986).Justice in Social Relations, Plenum Press, New York.
Bryant, B. E. (1975). Respondent selection in a time of changing household composition.J. Market. Res. 12: 129–135.
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., and Stokes, D. E. (1960).The American Voter, Wiley, New York.
Cohen, R. L. (1986).Justice: Views From the Social Sciences, Plenum Press, New york.
Conover, P. J. (1985). The impact of group economic interests on political evaluations.Am. Polit. Quart. 13, 139–166.
Cook, F. L. (1979).Who Should Be Helped? Public Support for Social Services, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
Davies, J. C. (1962). Toward a theory of revolution.Am. Social. Rev. 27: 5–19.
Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: what determines which value will be used as a basis of distributive justice?J. Soc. Issues 31: 137–150.
Downs, A. (1957).An Economic Theory of Democracy, Harper and Row, New York.
Feldman, S. (1983). Economic individualism and American public opinion.Am. Polit. Quart. 11: 3–29.
Fiorina, M. P. (1978). Economic retrospective voting in American national elections: a microanalysis.Am. J. Polit. Sci. 22: 426–443.
Folger, R. (1984).The Sense of Injustice: Social Psychological Perspectives, Plenum Press, New York.
Guimond, S., and Dubé-Simand, L. (1983). Relative deprivation theory and the Quebec Nationalist Movement: The cognition-emotion distinction and the personal-group deprivation issue.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 44: 526–535.
Gurr, T. R. (1971).Why Men Rebel, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Hochschild, J. L. (1981).What's Fair? American Beliefs About Distributive Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Homans, G..C (1961).Social behavior: Its Elementary Forms, Harcourt Brace, New York.
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J., and Thaler, R. (1986).Perceptions of unfairness: constraints on wealth seeking. Paper presented at the Conference on the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory, Graduate School of Business, The University of Chicago.
Kinder, D. R., and Kiewiet, D. R. (1981). Sociotropic politics: the American case.Br. J. Polit. Sci. 11: 129–161.
Kinder, D. R., and Sears, D. O. (1985). Public opinion and political action. In Lindzey, G., and Aronson, E. (eds.),The Handbook of Social Psychology, 3rd ed., Random House, New York.
Lane, R. E. (1962).Political Ideology, Free Press, New York.
Lane, R. E. (1986). Market justice, political justice.Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 80: 383–402.
Laver, M. (1981).The Politics of Private Desires: A Guide to the Politics of Rational Choice, Penguin, New York.
Lerner, M., and Lerner, S. (1981).The Justice Motive in Social Behavior: Adapting to Times of Scarcity and Change, Plenum Press, New York.
Lind, E. A., and Tyler, T. R. (1988).The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice, Plenum Press, New York.
McClosky, H., and Zaller, J. (1984).The American Ethos: Public Attitudes Toward Capitalism and Democracy, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Messick, D. M., and Cook, K. S. (1986).Equity Theory: Psychological and Sociological Perspectives, Praeger, New York.
Mikula, G. (1980).Justice and Social Interaction, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Mill, J. S. (1890).Utilitarianism, The Humboldt Publishing Company, London.
Moore, B., Jr. (1978).Injustice: The Social Bases of Obedience and Revolt, Sharpe, New York.
Rasinski, K. A. (1987). What's fair is fair... or is it? Public values and conflicting public views about social justice.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 53: 201–211.
Rasinski, K. A. (1984). Outcomes, fairness, and values as predictors of political responses to government allocation policies and practices: a field study. Unpublished dissertation, Nortwestern University, Evanston, IL.
Rasinski, K. A., and Tyler, T. R. (1988). Fairness and vote choice in the 1984 presidential election,Am. Polit. Quart. 16: 5–24.
Rawls, J. (1971).A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Runciman, W. S. (1966).Relative Deprivation and Social Justice, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Sears, D. O., and McConahay, J. S. (1973).The Politics of Violence: The New Urban Blacks and the Watts Riot, Houghton-Mifflin, Boston.
Thibaut, J., and Walker, L. (1975).Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Trohldahl, V., and Carter, R. E. (1964). Random selection of respondents within households in phone surveys.J. Market. Res. 1: 171–176.
Tyler, T. R. (1984). The role of perceived injustice in defendants evaluations of their courtroom experience.Law Soc. Rev. 18: 51–74.
Tyler, T. R. (1986a).Justice, legitimacy, and compliance. Unpublished manuscript, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
Tyler, T. R. (1986b). Justice and leadership endorsement. In Lau, R. R., and Sears, D. O. (eds.),Political Cognition, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Tyler, T. R., and Caine, A. (1981). The influence of outcomes and procedures on satisfaction with formal leaders.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 41: 642–655.
Tyler, T. R., and Folger, R. (1980). Distributional and procedural aspects of satisfaction with citizen-police encounters.Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 1: 281–292.
Tyler, T. R., Rasinski, K. A., and Griffin, E. (1986). Alternative images of the citizen: implications for public policy.Am. Psychol. 42: 970–978.
Tyler, T. R., Rasinski, K. A., and McGraw, K. M. (1985). The influence of perceived injustice upon support for the president, political authorities, and government institutions.J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 15: 72–81.
Tyler, T. R., Rasinski, K. A., & Spodick, N. (1985). The influence of voice upon satisfaction with leaders: Exploring the meaning of process control.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 48: 72–81.
Verba, S., and Orren, G. (1985).Equality in America: The View From the Top, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Walster, E., Walster, G. W., and Berscheid, E. (1978).Equity: Theory and Research, Allyn & Bacon, Boston.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rasinski, K.A. Economic justice, political behavior, and American political values. Soc Just Res 2, 61–79 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01052300
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01052300