Skip to main content
Log in

The long-term residual value of rock phosphate and superphosphate fertilizers for various plant species under field conditions

  • Published:
Fertilizer research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In three, long-term field experiments on different lateritic soils in south-western Australia, the effectiveness of superphosphate and rock phosphate fertilizers applied 10 years (one experiment) or 4 years previously was measured relative to the effectiveness of freshly-applied superphosphate (relative effectiveness or RE) using several different plant species. For the species comparisons, RE values were estimated using the initial slope of the relationship between yield and the level of P applied. In addition, RE values were also determined for different levels of application to test whether RE values for previously-applied fertilizer changed with increasing level of application. Soil samples were collected 3–5 months before sowing for a soil test for phosphate (P) and the soil test values were related to plant yields measured later that year.

At each site, the RE value of previously-appliedrock phosphate was calculated using initial slopes and was mostly consistently low and was similar (0.04–0.18) for all plant species. The exceptions were that the RE value about doubled for barley in one experiment and for another experiment the effectiveness of calcined (heated) C-grade ore (Calciphos) was about 2–3 times that of the untreated (i.e. unheated) fertilizer. In most cases, the RE value of previously appliedsuperphosphate at each site was similar (0.23–0.34) regardless of plant species. The exceptions were that the RE value was about double for barley in one experiment and about half for triticale in another. Rock phosphates applied 4 or 10 years previously were between about one twentieth to one quarter as effective as freshly applied superphosphate. Superphosphate applied 4 or 10 years previously was between about a quarter to one third as effective as freshly-applied superphosphate. At each site, the yield of each species was closely related to the P content of plant tissue and the relationship was independent of the fertilizer type or when the fertilizer was applied.

At each site and for each plant species, the RE value of the previously-applied rock phosphate was estimated for different levels of application and generally decreased with increasing level of application, whereas the RE value for previously-applied superphosphate mostly remained approximately constant.

At each site, the relationship between yield and soil test values (i.e. soil test for P calibrations) differed depending on the fertilizer type and the plant species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. AOAC (1975) ‘Official Methods of Analysis’. 12th Edn. Assoc Off Agric Chem: Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barrow NJ and Campbell NA (1972) Methods of measuring the residual value of fertilizers. Aust J Exp Agric Anim Husb 12: 502–510

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bolland MDA (1987) Effectiveness of topdressed and incorporated superphosphates and Duchess rock phosphate for subterranean clover on sandy soils near Esperance, Western Australia. Aust J Exp Agric 27: 89–92

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bolland MDA and Allen DG (1987) Comparison of three soil tests for phosphates on lateritic soil fertilized with superphosphate crandallite rock phosphates and apatite rock phosphates. Aust J Soil Res 25: 555–562

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bolland MDA and Barrow NJ (1988) Effect of level of application on the relative effectiveness of rock phosphate. Fert Res 15: 181–192

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bolland MDA, Allen DG and Gilkes RJ (1989) The influence of seasonal conditions, plant species and fertilizer type on the predictions of plant yield using the Colwell bicarbonate soil test for phosphate. Fert Res (in press)

  7. Bolland MDA and Bowden JW (1986) Summary of long-term rock phosphate experiments in south-western Australia. J Aust Inst Agric Sci 52: 227–236

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bolland MDA, Gilkes RJ and Allen DG (1988) The residual value of superphosphate and rock phosphates for lateritic soils and its evaluation using three soil phosphate tests. Fert Res 15: 253–280

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bolland MDA, Gilkes RJ and D'Antuono MF (1988) The effectiveness of rock phosphate fertilizers in Australian Agriculture: a review. Aust J Exp Agric 28: 655–668

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bolland MDA, Weatherley AJ and Gilkes RJ (1988) Residual effectiveness of superphosphate is greater than that of rock phosphate fertilizers for lateritic soils in south-western Australia. Aust J Exp Agric 28: 83–90

    Google Scholar 

  11. Colwell JD (1963) The estimation of the phosphorus fertilizer requirements of wheat in sourther New South Wales by soil analysis. Aust J Exp Agric Anim Husb 3: 190–197

    Google Scholar 

  12. Colwell JD (1977) National Soil Fertility Project. Vol 1. Objective and procedures (CSIRO Div Soils in Collaboration with State Dept Agric and Fert Indus. (CSIRO Div Soils: Adelaide)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Colwell JD (1983) Fertilizer requirements. In: Soils: An Australian Viewpoint (Ed CSIRO Div Soils, Adelaide). pp 795–815. (CSIRO: Melbourne/Academic Press)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Colwell JD (1985) Fertilizer progress. 1. Variability in response of successive crops to fresh and previous application of phosphorus fertilizer, in Australia and Brazil. Fert Res 8: 21–38

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hughes JC and Gilkes RJ (1986) The effect of rock phosphate properties on the extent of fertilizer dissolution in soils. Aust J Soil Res 24: 209–217

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hughes JC and Gilkes RJ (1986) The effect of soil properties and level of fertilizer application on the dissolution of Sechura rock phosphate in some soils from Brazil, Columbia, Australia and Nigeria. Aust J Soil Res 24: 219–227

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kanabo IAK and Gilkes RJ (1987) A comparison between plant response and chemical measurement of the dissolution of reactive phosphate rock in soils of different pH and phosphorus retention. Aust J Soil Res 25: 451–460

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kanabo IAK and Gilkes RJ (1988) The effect of the level of phosphate rock application on its dissolution in soil and on bicarbonate-soluble phosphorus. Fert Res 16: 67–85

    Google Scholar 

  19. Northcote KH (1979) A Factual Key for the Recognition of Australian Soils. 4th Edn. Rellim Techn Publ: Glenside, South Australia

    Google Scholar 

  20. Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS and Dean LA (1954) Estimation of available phosphorous in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. US Dep Agric Circ No 939

  21. Ozanne PG, Keay J and Biddiscombe EF (1969) The comparative applied phosphate requirements of eight annual pasture species. Aust J Agric Res 20: 809–818

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ozanne PG, Howes KMW and Anne Petch (1976) The comparative phosphate requirements of four annual pastures and two crops. Aust J Agric Res 27: 479–488

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ozanne PG and Shaw TC (1967) Phosphate sorption by soils as a measure of the phosphate requirement for pasture growth. Aust J Agric Res 18: 601–612

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ross GJS (1980) ‘MLP Maximum Likelihood Program’ (Rothamsted Exp Stat: Harpenden, UK)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sale PWG and Blair GC (1989) Low solubility phosphate fertilizers for pastures: an alternative perspective. Agric Sci 2: 34–39

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bolland, M.D.A., Weatherley, A.J. & Gilkes, R.J. The long-term residual value of rock phosphate and superphosphate fertilizers for various plant species under field conditions. Fertilizer Research 20, 89–100 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01055433

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01055433

Key words

Navigation