Abstract
We characterize the cost function for electric power transmission. It is complex and non-linear, exhibiting scale economies over its range. The social planning problem for network transmission expansion is illustrated with a simple numerical example. The regulatory problem for joint generation and transmission cost minimization is addressed. It is shown that information asymmetries about the transmission cost function can lead to coordination losses when there is competition in the generation segment. We parametrize the tradeoff between potential coordination losses in transmission planning and benefits of competition and examine some potential alternatives for improved regulation of the transmission planning process.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arny, M. 1992. “The Wisconsin Transmission Interface Study: A Model for Regional Electric Transmission Planning.”The Electricity Journal 5(5): 18–23.
Baldick, R. and E. Kahn. 1992. “Transmission Planning in the Era of Integrated Resource Planning: A Survey of Recent Cases.” LBL-32231. Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
Berg, S. and J. Tschirhart. 1988.Natural Monopoly Regulation: Principles and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bergen, A. 1986.Power Systems Analysis. Prentice-Hall.
California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). 1990. “Decision 90-09-059, the Kramer-Victor Decision.” (September 12).
Consolidated Edison Company. 1990. “Request for Proposals for Supply Side and Demand Side Resources RFP# 90-1.” New York, NY.
Crew, M. and P. Kleindorfer. 1986.The Economics of Public Utility Regulation. MIT Press.
Edison Electric Institute (EEI). 1991.Statistical Yearbook of the Electric Utility Industry/1990.
Einhorn, M. 1990. “Electricity Wheeling and Incentive Regulation. ”Journal of Regulatory Economics 2: 173–189.
Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). 1986.TAG-Technical Assessment Guide, Volume 1: Electricity Supply-1986. Palo Alto. (December).
Energy Information Administration (EIA). 1992.Financial Statistics of Selected Investor-Owned Electric Utilities 1990. DOE/EIA-0437(90)/1.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). 1989. “The Transmission Task Force's Report to the Commission. Electricity Transmission: Realities, Theory and Policy Alternatives.” (October).
Gilbert, R. and M. Riordan. 1992. “Regulating Complementary Products: A Problem of Institutional Choice.” Working paper. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
Hogan, W. 1992. “Contract Networks for Electric Power Transmission.”Journal of Regulatory Economics 4: 211–242.
Hunt, P. 1992. “Supply Procurement for Uncertain Future Demand Under Regulation.” Presented to the Fifth Annual Western Conference, Rutgers University Advanced Workshop in Regulation and Public Utility Economics. (July 8–10).
Kahn, E. 1991. “Risks in Independent Power Contracts: An Empirical Survey.”The Electricity Journal (vol. 4, no. 9, November): 30–45.
Kelly, K., S. Henderson, P. Nagler, and M. Eifert. 1987. “Some Economic Principles for Pricing Wheeled Power.” Columbus, OH: The National Regulatory Research Institute. (August).
Lieberman, L. 1992. “The Impact of Procurement Regime on the Price Paid for Independent Generation.” Working paper. Palo Alto, CA: Dept. of Economics, Stanford University.
Pacific Gas and Electric Company. 1991. “LOCATION: Incremental Transmission Impact Evaluation Program.” Presentation to California Public Utilities Commission Workshop on Transmission. (September).
Public Service Commission of Wisconsin (PSCW). 1989. “Advance Plan Order 5.” Docket 05-EP-5.
Public Service Commission of Wisconsin (PSCW). 1991. “Advance Plan 6 Filing.” Docket 05-EP-6.
Rupp, S. 1990. “Report of Steven S. Rupp on System Benefits of the Proposed Kramer-Victor 220 kV Transmission Line. ” Attached to Rebuttal Testimony of Steven S. Rupp before the California Public Utilities Commission. Application No. 89-03-026. Roseville, CA: Sierra Energy and Risk Assessment. (February 20).
Scherer, C. 1976. “Estimating peak and off-peak marginal costs for an electric power system: anex ante approach.“The Bell Journal of Economics (vol. 7, no. 2, Autumn): 575–601.
Shirmohammadi, D. and C. Thomas. 1991. “Valuation of the Transmission Impact in a Resource Bidding Process.”IEEE Transactions on Power Systems (vol. 6, no. 1, February): 316–323.
Stevenson, William D. Jr. 1982.Elements of Power System Analysis. McGraw-Hill.
Stall, H. 1989.Least Cost Utility Planning. John Wiley.
Stoft, S. and E. Kahn. 1991. “Auction Markets for Dispatchable Power: How to Score the Bids.”Journal of Regulatory Economics 3(3): 275–286.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baldick, R., Kahn, E. Network costs and the regulation of wholesale competition in electric power. J Regul Econ 5, 367–384 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065403
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065403