Abstract
Observed variation in the decisions of state regulators to deregulate AT&T in the provision of intrastate interLATA telecommunications services provides useful data with which to test the economic theory of regulation against its principal alternative—the public interest theory. An empirical model of the decision to deregulate is specified and estimated. Our results lend empirical support to the economic theory of regulation and fail to support the public interest theory. The results also help to explain the lethargic pace of deregulation of this industry.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Crandall, Robert W. 1988. “Surprises from Telephone Deregulation and the Divestiture.”American Economic Review (May): 323–327.
Crew, Michael, and Charles K. Rowley. 1988. “Toward a Public Choice Theory of Monopoly Regulation.”Public Choice 57:49–67.
Eckert, Ross D.1981. “The Life Cycle of Regulatory Commissioners.”Journal of Law and Economics (April): 113–120.
Evans, Lewis, and Steven Garber. 1988. “Public-Utility Regulators are Only Human: A Positive Theory of Rational Constraints.”American Economic Review (June): 444–462.
Evans, Lewis, and Steven Garber. 1989. “The Rational Regulator's Pricing Response to Enhanced Opportunities to “Bypass” the Public Switched Network.”Journal of Regulatory Economics (September): 271–292.
Frentrup, C. 1988. “The Effect of Competition and Regulation on AT&T's Intrastate Toll Prices.” Federal Communications Commission: Common Carrier Bureau, June.
Greene, William H. 1990.Econometric Analysis. New York: MacMillan Publishing Company.
Haring, John, and H. M. Shooshan, III. 1991.Competition and Consumer Welfare in Long-Distance Telecommunications. National Economic Regulatory Associates, Inc.
Hauser, John R. 1978. “Testing the Accuracy, Usefulness and Significance of Probabilistic Choice Models: An Information Theoretic Approach.”Operations Research (4): 406–421.
Im, Bae G., David L. Kaserman, and Francois Melese. 1989. “Endogenous Regulation and the Firm's Regulatory Expenses.”Applied Economics (21): 375–385.
Kahn, Alfred E. 1988. “Surprises of Airline Deregulation.”American Economic Review (78): 316–322.
Kahn, Alfred E. 1984. “The Road to More Intelligent Telephone Pricing.”Yale Journal on Regulation (2): 139–158.
Kaserman, David L., and John W. Mayo. 1988a. “Long Distance Telecommunications Policy: Rationality on Hold.”Public Utilities Fortnightly (122): 18–27.
Kaserman, David L., and John W. Mayo. 1988b. “The Economics of Regulation: Theory and Policy in the Post-Divestiture Telecommunications Industry.” InPublic Policy Toward Corporations, edited by Arnold A. Heggestad. Gainesville: University of Florida Press.
Kaserman, David L., and John W. Mayo. 1990. “Deregulation and Market Power Criteria: An Evaluation of State Level Telecommunications Policy.” InTelecommunications Deregulation: Market Power and Cost Allocation Issues, edited by John R. Allison and Dennis L. Thomas. New York: Quorum Books, Inc.
Kaserman, David L., John W. Mayo, and Joseph E. Flynn. 1990. “Cross-Subsidization in Telecommunications: Beyond the Universal Service Fairy Tale.”Journal of Regulatory Economics (2): 231–249.
Katz, Michael L., and Robert D. Willig. 1983. “The Case for Freeing AT&T. ”Regulation (July/August): 43–49.
Laffont, Jean-Jacques, and Jean Tirole. 1991. “The Politics of Government Decision-Making: A Theory of Regulatory Capture.”Quarterly Journal of Economics (November): 1089–1127.
Landes, William M., and Richard A. Posner. 1981. “Market Power in Antitrust Cases.”Harvard Law Review (94): 937–996.
Maddala, G. S. 1983.Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McFadden, Daniel. 1974. “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior.” InFrontiers in Econometrics, edited by P. Zarembka. New York: Academic Press.
National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners. 1987.1986 Annual Report Utility and Carrier Regulation, November.
Peltzman, Sam. 1976. “Toward a More General Theory of Regulation.”Journal of Law and Economics (19): 211–240.
Posner, Richard A. 1974. “Theories of Economic Regulation.”Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, (4): 335–358.
Saving, Thomas R. 1970. “Concentration Ratios and the Degree of Monopoly.”International Economic Review (11): 139–146.
Spiller, Pablo. 1990.“Politicians, Interest Groups, and Regulators: A Multiple Principals Agency Theory of Regulation, or ‘Let Them be Bribed.’”Journal of Law and Economics (33): 65–102.
Stigler, George S. 1971. “The Theory of Economic Regulation.”Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science (2): 3–21.
Temin, Peter. 1987.The Fall of the Bell System. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Temin, Peter. 1990. “Cross Subsidies in the Telephone Network after Divestiture.”Journal of Regulatory Economics (2): 349–362.
U.S. Congressional Budget Office. 1984.Local Telephone Rates: Issues and Alternatives. Washington: Staff Working Paper, January.
Weingast, Barry R., and Mark J. Moran. 1983. “Bureaucratic Discretion or Congressional Control? Regulatory Policy Making by the Federal Trade Commission.”Journal of Political Economy, (91): 765–800.
Weingast, Barry R. 1984. “The Congressional-Bureaucratic System: A Principal-Agent Perspective.”Public Choice (44): 147–192.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaserman, D.L., Mayo, J.W. & Pacey, P.L. The political economy of deregulation: The case of intrastate long distance. J Regul Econ 5, 49–63 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066313
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066313