Skip to main content
Log in

Pupation site selection inDrosophila simulans

  • Published:
Behavior Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Selection for increased pupation height was carried out for 17 generations in two lines ofDrosophila simulans derived from a genetically heterogeneous base population. The realized heritability for mean pupation height in each line, calculated over the 17 generations, did not differ significantly from zero. Both selected lines tended to pupate away from the center of the culture medium to a greater extent than the control in the latter generations of the experiment but not in earlier generations. Pupation height may have been refractory to artificial selection because of an adaptation of this species to pupate on the larval food source. In a subsequent experiment, each line was tested at three larval densities in an apparatus different from the one used for selection. Each successively higher density showed a corresponding increase in pupation height. Both selected lines had higher mean pupation heights than the control line. The differences between lines became more pronounced as the larval density increased.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barker, J. S. F. (1971). Ecological difference and competitive interaction betweenDrosophila melanogaster andDrosophila simulans in small laboratory populations.Oecologia 8:139–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnet, B. K., and Connolly, K. (1974). Activity and sexual behaviour inDrosophila. In van Abeelen, J. H. F. (ed.),The Genetics of Behaviour, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 236–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavener, D. (1979). Preference for ethanol inDrosophila melanogaster associated with the alcohol dehydrogenase polymorphism.Behav. Genet. 9:359–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, D. L., and Paietta, J. V. (1972). Selection for circadian eclosion time inDrosophila melanogaster.Science 178:994–995.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Souza, H. M. L., da Cunha, A. B., and dos Santos, E. P. (1970). Adaptive polymorphism of behavior involved in laboratory populations ofDrosophila willistoni.Am. Nat. 104:175–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, D. S. (1960).Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, Ronald Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, L. J., and McDonald, J. F. (1980). Relationship between ADH activity and behavioral response to environmental alcohol inDrosophila.Behav. Genet. 10:237–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, D. D. (1975). Results from long-term selection experiments relative to selection limits. In Bogard, R. (ed.),Genetics Lectures, Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, pp. 253–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markow, T. A. (1979). A survey of intra- and interspecific variation for pupation height inDrosophila.Behav. Genet. 9:209–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosteller, F., and Youtz, C. (1961). Tables of the Freeman-Tukey transformations for the binomial and Poisson distributions.Biometrika 48:433–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, P. A. (1975a). The comparative evolutionary biology of the sibling speciesDrosophila melanogaster andDrosophila simulans.Q. Rev. Biol. 50:151–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, P. A. (1975b). Quantitative variation in natural populations.Genetics 79:127–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringo, J. M. (1978). The development of behavior inDrosophila. In Burghardt, G., and Bekoff, M. (eds.),The Development of Behavior. Comparative and Evolutionary Aspects, Garland, New York, pp. 63–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringo, J. M., and Wood, D. F. (1982). Gregarious pupation site selection inD. melanogaster andD. simulans.Dros. Inform. Serv. 58:127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sameoto, D. D., and Miller, R. S. (1968). Selection of pupation site byDrosophila melanogaster andDrosophila simulans.Ecology 49:177–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlager, G. (1959).Fluctuations and Gene-Environment Interaction of Pupation Site in Drosophila melanogaster, M. A. thesis, University of Kansas, Lawrence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R. (1966). Pupation site differences inDrosophila melanogaster.U. Kans. Sci. Bull. 46:697–715.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R., and Rohlf, F. J. (1981).Biometry, 2nd ed., W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R., Ehrlich, P. R., Hunter, P. E., and Schlager, G. (1960). Some factors affecting pupation site ofDrosophils.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 53:174–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolowski, M. B. (1980). Foraging strategies ofDrosophila melanogaster: A chromosomal analysis.Behav. Genet. 10:291–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D., and Ringo, J. M. (1982). Artificial selection for altered male wing display inDrosophila simulans.Behav. Genet. 12:449–458.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported in part by National Science Foundation Grant DEB-7903866.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ringo, J., Wood, D. Pupation site selection inDrosophila simulans . Behav Genet 13, 17–27 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01071741

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01071741

Key Words

Navigation