Skip to main content
Log in

Asymmetric measures of association, closed data, and multivariate analysis

  • Published:
Journal of the International Association for Mathematical Geology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The association between constant-sum variables Xi and Xj expressed as percentages can be calculated as a product-moment correlation between Xi and Xj/(100 − Xi ) and a correlation between Xj and Xi/(100 − Xj ). An asymmetric, square matrix may be formed from these coefficients, and multivariate analysis performed by two methods: singular value decomposition and canonical decomposition. Either analysis avoids problems in the interpretation of correlation coefficients determined from closed arrays, and provides information about dependencies among the variables beyond that obtained from the usual correlation coefficient between Xi and Xj.Two examples show the canonical decomposition to have the greater usefulness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, R. Y., 1977, Short term sedimentation response in lakes in western United States as measured by automated sampling: Limnol. Oceanogr., v. 22, no. 3, p. 423–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. C., 1976, Principal components analysis using the hypothetical closed array: Jour. Math. Geol., v. 8, no. 1, p. 25–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chayes, F., 1962, Numerical correlation and petrographic variation: Jour. Geol., v. 70, no. 4, p. 440–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chayes, F., 1971, Ratio correlation: The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chayes, F. and Kruskal, W., 1966, An approximate statistical test for correlation between proportions: Jour. Geol., v. 74, no. 5, p. 692–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, R. J. and Mosimann, J. E., 1969, Concepts of independence for proportions with a generalization of the Dirichlet distribution: Jour. Amer. Statist. Assoc., v. 64, p. 194–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantine, A. G. and Gower, J. C., 1978, Graphical representation of asymmetric matrices: Appl. Statist., v. 27, no. 3, p. 297–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darroch, J. N., and Ratcliff, D., 1970, Null correlation for proportions II: Jour. Math. Geol., v. 2, no. 3, p. 307–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darroch, J. N., and Ratcliff, D., 1978, No-association of proportions: Jour. Math. Geol., v. 10, no. 4, p. 361–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, K. R., 1971, The biplot graphic display of matrices with applications to principal components: Biometrika, v. 58, no. 3, p. 453–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gower, J. C., 1977, The analysis of asymmetry and orthogonality,in Recent developments in statistics: North Holland, Amsterdam, p. 109–123.

  • Kork, J. O., 1977, Examination of the Chayes-Kruskal procedure for testing correlations between proportions: Jour. Math. Geol., v. 9, no. 6, p. 543–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miesch, A. T., 1969, The constant sum problem in geology,in Computer applications in the earth sciences; an international symposium: Plenum Press, New York, p. 161–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuhfer, E. B., 1979, Temporal and lateral variations in geochemistry and mineralogy in suspended sediments of lakes as studied through automated sampling: unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Univ. New Mexico.

  • Trochimczyk, J. and Chayes, F., 1978, Some properties of principal component scores: Jour. Math. Geol., v. 10, no. 1, p. 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hohn, M.E., Nuhfer, E.B. Asymmetric measures of association, closed data, and multivariate analysis. Mathematical Geology 12, 235–246 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01091206

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01091206

Key words

Navigation