Skip to main content
Log in

The state's stake in educational reform

  • Published:
The Urban Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article argues that the recent national reports on educational reform must be understood as manifestations of the influence of capital and the state. The considerable pressure exerted on the schools by representatives of state capitalism does not guarantee that the proposed reforms will be enacted, however. The contradictory nature of the school's location in the democratic capitalist state, coupled with various forms of teacher and student resistance to the reports' recommendations, afford the opportunity for progressive educators to strip away the mystique of the school as a neutral site and to challenge the dominant ideology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Althusser, Louis (1971). Ideology and the ideological state apparatuses: notes toward an investigation. In Louis Althusser,Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. London: New Left Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, Edward H. (1984). State hegemony and the schooling process.Journal of Education 166: 239–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borman, Kathryn, and Spring, Joel (1984).Schools in Central Cities. New York: Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, Samuel and Gintis, Herbert (1976)Schooling in Capitalist America. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, Ernest (1983).High School: A Report on Secondary Education in America. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullogh, Robert V., Jr., Gitlin, Andrew D., and Goldstein, Stanley L. (1984). Ideology, teacher role, and resistance.Teachers College Record 86: 339–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie Corporation of New York (1983).Education and Economic Progress: Toward a National Economic Policy. New York: Carnegie Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnoy, Martin, and Levin, Henry (1985).Schooling and Work in the Democratic State. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, Manuel (1980).The Economic Crisis and American Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Economic Development (1985).Investing in Our Children: Business and the Public Schools. New York: Committee on Economic Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everhart, Robert (1983).Reading, Writing, and Resistance: Adolescence and Labor in a Junior High School. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagen, Richard R. (ed.) (1979).Capitalism and the State in U.S.-Latin American Relations. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, Walter (1985). Fixing the schools: the ideological turn.Issues in Education III: 113–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, Philip (1965).Education and Social Change in Ghana. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, Henry A. (1983).Theory and Resistance in Education: A Pedagogy for Opposition. South Hadley, MA: Bergin and Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, Henry A. (1984). Public philosophy and the crisis in education.Harvard Educational Review 54: 186–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodlad, John (1983).A Place Called School. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, Henry M., and Rumberger, Russell W. (1983).The Educational Implications of High Technology. Stanford: Institute for Research in Institutional Finance and Governance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melman, Seymour (1983). Manager's debacle.New York Times, November 4, p. 27.

  • Nasaw, David (1979).Schooled to Order: A Social History of Public Schooling in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Excellence in Education (1983).A Nation at Risk. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Board (1983).Educating Americans for the 21st Century. Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Connor, James (1973).The Fiscal Crisis of the State. New York: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, Svi (1985). Capitalism at risk: the political economy of the educational reports of 1983.Educational Theory 35: 57–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sizer, Theodore R. (1984).Horace's Compromise: The Dilemma of the American High School. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spring, Joel (1976).The Sorting Machine: National Educational Policy Since 1945. New York: David McKay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, Daniel (1984). The American high school at the crossroads.Educational Leadership 42: 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Task Force on Education for Economic Growth (1983).Action for Excellence. Denver: Education Commission of the States.

    Google Scholar 

  • Task Force on Elementary and Secondary Educational Policy (1983).Making the Grade. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weis, Lois (1985).Between Two Worlds: Black Students in an Urban Community College. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, Paul (1977).Learning to Labour: How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs. Westmead, England: Saxon House Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

A somewhat different version of this paper will appear in Shea, C., Sola, P., & Kahane, E., (eds.),The New Servants of Power: A Critique of the 1980's School Reform Movement. Greenwood Press (forthcoming).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berman, E.H. The state's stake in educational reform. Urban Rev 18, 6–18 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01112119

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01112119

Keywords

Navigation