Skip to main content
Log in

Equity in education: Low priority in the school reform movement

  • Published:
The Urban Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The author argues that the educational reform movements are cyclical and that the present call for excellence can be seen in previous cycles. Noting the absence of a concern for equity in the many recent reports and studies, the author discusses the concepts of equity, equality, and excellence. Alternative reforms are proposed to enhance equity for minority and presently underachieving youth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, M. (1982).The Paideia Proposal: An Educational Manifesto. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • College Board (1985).Equality and Excellence: The Educational Status of Black Americans. New York: College Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conant, J. B. (1959).The American High School Today: A First Report to Interested Citizens. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, W. G. (1964). Problems of disadvantaged youth, urban and rural.Journal of Negro Education 33: 218–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gans, H. J. (1973).More Equality. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, B. C. (1985). Excellence and equity: Implications for effective schools,Journal of Negro Education 54: 289–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, F. C. (1977).The Changing Mood in America: Eroding Commitment. Washington, D.C.: Howard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, C. (1986). Ask the teachers.Washington Post (March 22): A27.

  • National Commission on Excellence in Education (1983).A Nation at Risk. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakes, J. (1985).Keeping Track: How Schools Structure Inequality. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohanian, S. (1985). Huffing and puffing and blowing schools excellent.Phi Delta Kappan 66: 316–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passow, A. H. (1984). Tackling the reform reports of the 1980's.Phi Delta Kappan 65: 644–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Public Education Information Network (1985).Equity and Excellence: Toward an Agenda for School Reform. St. Louis: Public Education Information Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweinhart, L. J., and Weikart, D. P. (1980).Young Children Grow Up: The Effects of the Perry Preschool Program on Youth Through Age 15. Ypsilanti, Mich.: High/Scope Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smiley, M. B., and Miller, H. L. (eds.) (1968).Policy Issues in Urban Education. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toch, T. (1984). The dark side of the excellence movement.Phi Delta Kappan 66: 173–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyack, D., Lowe, R., and Hansot, E. (1984).Public Schools in Hard Times: The Great Depression and Recent Years. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberg, D. (1983).Human Rights in Education. New York: Philosophical Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, P. (1973). Equity in law and ethics. InDictionary of the History of Ideas: Studies of Selected Pivotal Ideas. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willie, C. V. (1982). Educating students who are good enough: Is excellence an excuse to exclude?Change 14: 16–20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones-Wilson, F.C. Equity in education: Low priority in the school reform movement. Urban Rev 18, 31–39 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01112121

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01112121

Keywords

Navigation