Skip to main content
Log in

What's missing from the national agenda for school reform? Teacher professionalism and local initiative

  • Published:
The Urban Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The author argues that the many recent reports on schools signify a renewed emphasis on social Darwinism. In noting that the reports are numerous and calls for reform vehement, Noblit suggests that the emerging agenda is neither starting nor new. By characterizing this reform agenda as both inappropriate and impotent, Noblit argues that the concepts of quality and excellence are misconceived, as are the means and actors needed to create excellence. Noblit concludes by developing an alternative reform agenda based on teacher professionalism and local initiative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aronowitz, S. (1973).False Promises: The Shaping of American Working Class Consciousness. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, B., Noblit, G., and Hare, R. (1985). The qualitative critique of teacher labor market studies.The Urban Review 17: 98–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Amico, J. (1982). Using effective schools studies to create effective schools: no recipes yet.Educational Leadership 50: 60–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deal, T., and Kennedy, A. (1982).Corporate Cultures. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds, R. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor.Educational Leadership 37: 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edson, C. (1983). Risking the nation: Historical dimension on survival and educational reform.Issues in Education 1: 171–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firestone, W., and Herriott, R. (1982). Prescriptions for effective elementary schools don't fit secondary schools.Educational Leadership 51–53.

  • Forester, J. (1981). Questioning and organizing attention.Administration and Society 13: 161–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gage, N. (1984). What do we know about teaching effectiveness.Phi Delta Kappan 66: 87–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallup, G. (1984). The sixteenth annual Gallup Poll of the public's attitudes toward the public schools.Phi Delta Kappan 66: 23–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodlad, J. (1984).A Place Called School. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husen, T. (1983). Are standards in U.S. schools really lagging behind those in other countries?Phi Delta Kappan 64: 455–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D., and Kahn, R. (1978).The Social Psychology of Organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, M. (1980).Street-Level Bureaucracy. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J., and Rowan, B. (1978). The structure of educational organizations. In M. Meyer et al. (eds.),Environments and Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M., et al (eds.) (1978).Environments and Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. (1956).The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, R., and Perrin, R. (1977).The Social Bond. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noblit, G., and Johnston, B., eds. (1982).The School Principal and Desegregation. Springfield, IL: Charles Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noblit, G. (in press). Ideological purity and variety in effective middle schools. In G. Noblit and W. Pink (eds.),The Social Context of Schooling: Qualitative Studies. Norwood, N.J.: Albex.

  • Perrow, C. (1970).Organizational Analysis: A Sociological View. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T., and Waterman, R. (1982).In Search of Excellence. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirsig, R. (1974).Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance. New York: William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild-Whitt, J. (1979). The collectivist organization: An alternative to rational-bureaucratic models.American Sociological Review 44: 509–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlechty, P., and Noblit, G. (1985) Using a focus on new teachers to develop experienced staff. A paper prepared for the Rand Corporation, Washington, D.C.

  • Shapiro, S. (1984). Choosing our educational legacy: Disempowerment or emancipation.Issues in Education 2: 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spring, J. (1980).Educating the Worker-Citizen. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren-Little, J. (1981).School Success and Staff Development. Boulder, Colo.: Center for Action Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. (1982). Administering education in loosely coupled systems.Phi Delta Kappan 69: 673–676.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This article is a revised version of a paper prepared for the American Educational Studies Association Annual Meeting, Atlanta, November 1985.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Noblit, G.W. What's missing from the national agenda for school reform? Teacher professionalism and local initiative. Urban Rev 18, 40–51 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01112122

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01112122

Keywords

Navigation