Skip to main content
Log in

Firm-size wage differentials in the Netherlands

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An unsolved problem in modern labor economics is the positive relation between the size of the firm in which a worker is employed and his wage. One line of research that has been developed quite recently in this field is the application of endogenous switching regression models. In this paper we utilize such a model to investigate firm-size wage differentials in the Netherlands. The principal findings are that larger firms pay higher returns on schooling whereas smaller firms tend to reward IQ. Combined with the finding that high IQ-workers are sorted into the largest firms, the results are consistent with a model of job screening. Furthermore, we find that employed sons of self-employed fathers are more likely to work in small firms and that wage prospects for all types of workers are indeed most favorable in larger firms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Björklund, A. and R. Moffitt, 1987, ‘The Estimation of Wage Gains and Welfare Gains in Self-Selection Models’,The Review of Economics and Statistics 69, 42–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. and J. Medoff, 1989, ‘The Employer Size-Wage Effect’,Journal of Political Economy 97, 1027–1059.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garen, J. E., 1985, ‘Worker Heterogeneity, Job Screening, and Firm-size’,Journal of Political Economy 93, 715–739.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartog, J., 1988, ‘An Ordered Response Model for Allocation and Earnings’,Kyklos 41, 113–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartog, J. and G. A. Pfann, 1985, Vervolgonderzoek Noordbrabantse Zesdeklassers (University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam).

    Google Scholar 

  • Idson, T. and D. Feaster, 1990, ‘A Selectivity Model of Employer-Size Wage Differentials’,Journal of Labor Economics 8, 99–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez, E. and B. Kugler, 1988, ‘The Earnings Impact of Training Duration in a Developing Country; an Ordered Probit Selection Model of Colombia's Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje (SENA)’,The Journal of Human Resources 22, 228–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L. F., 1978, ‘Unionism and Wage Rates: A Simultaneous Equation Model with qualitative and Limited-Dependent Variables’,International Economic Review 19, 415–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L. F., 1979, ‘Identification and Estimation in Binary Choice Models with Limited (Censored) Dependent Variables’,Econometrica 47, 977–996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. S., 1986, ‘Disequilibrium, Self-Selection, and Switching Models’, in Z. Griliches and M. D. Intriligator (eds.),Handbook of Econometrics, Volume III, Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Main, B. G. M. and B. Reilly, 1993, ‘The Employer Size-Wage Gap: Evidence for Britain’,Economica 60, 125–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oaxaca, R., 1973, ‘Male-Female Wage Differentials in Urban Labour Markets’,International Economic Review 14, 693–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oi, W., 1983a, ‘Heterogeneous Firms and the Organization of Production’,Economic Inquiry 21, 147–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oi, W., 1983b, ‘The Fixed Employment Cost of Specialized Labour’, in J. Triplett (ed.),The Measurement of Labour Costs, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oosterbeek, H., 1990, ‘Education and Earnings in the Netherlands; an Empirical Analysis’,European Economic Review 34, 1353–1375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, H. and A. Shah, 1986, ‘An Empirical Analysis of Self-Employed in the U.K.’,Journal of Applied Econometrics 1, 95–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, C. M. and K. F. Zimmermann, 1991, ‘Work Characteristics, Firm-Size and Wages’,The Review of Economics and Statistics 73, 705–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Berg, A. and W. Groot, 1992, ‘Union Membership in the Netherlands: A Cross-Sectional Analysis’,Empirical Economics 17, 537–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Gaag, J. and W. Vijverberg, 1988, ‘A Switching Regression Model for Wage Determinants in the Public and Private Sectors of a Developing Country’,The Review of Economics and Statistics 70, 224–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Ophem, H., J. Hartog and W. Vijverberg, 1993, ‘Job Complexity and Wages’,International Economic Review 34, 853–872.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, R. and S. Rosen, 1979, ‘Education and Self-Selection’,Journal of Political Economy 87, S7-S36.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oosterbeek, H., van Praag, M. Firm-size wage differentials in the Netherlands. Small Bus Econ 7, 173–182 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01135363

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01135363

Keywords

Navigation