Abstract
This paper analyzes a relationship between establishment size and gross job creation and destruction in the U.K. during the 1980's. I find that the gross job creation rate is highest in small plants and lowest in large ones. In contrast, the gross job destruction rate is lowest in small plants and highest in large ones. In absolute numbers, however, large plants create, but also destroy most jobs. I test convergence in plant size by computing Markov transition matrices. The advantage of this approach is that it avoids Galton's fallacy of regression towards the mean and that it reflects job creation and destruction between size classes. I find no evidence of convergence, hence no regression towards the mean.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Birch, D. L., 1979,The Job Generating Process, Program on Neighborhood and Regional Change, MIT, Cambridge MA.
Blanchflower, D. and S. Burgess, 1993, ‘Gross Job Creation and Destruction in the U.K.’,CEP Working Paper.
Boeri, T., 1994, ‘Why Are Establishments So Heterogeneous?’,Small Business Economics 6, 409–420.
Brock, W. A. and D. S. Evans, 1989, ‘Small Business Economics’,Small Business Economics 1, 7–20.
Contini, B. and R. Revelli, 1993, ‘Job Creation and Labour Mobility: The Vacancy-Chain Model and Some Empirical Findings’,R&P Working Paper No. 8/R&P, Torino.
Davis, S. J. and J. Haltiwanger, 1990, ‘Gross Job Creation and Destruction: Microeconomic Evidence and Macroeconomic implications’,NBER Macro Economic Annual 5, 123–168.
Davis, S. J. and J. Haltiwanger, 1992, ‘Gross Job Creation, Gross Job Destruction and Employment Reallocation’,Quarterly Journal of Economics 3, 819–863.
Davis, S. J., J. Haltiwanger and S. Shuh, forthcoming, ‘Small Business and Job Creation: Dissecting the Myth and Reassessing the Facts’,Small Business Economics.
Dunne, T., M. Roberts and L. Samuelson, 1989, ‘The Growth and Failure of U.S. Manufacturing Plants’,The Quarterly Journal of Economics 19, 495–515.
Evans, D. S., 1987a, ‘Test of Alternative Theories of Firm Growth’,Journal of Political Economy 95(4), 657–674.
Evans, D. S., 1987b, ‘The Relationship Between Firm Growth, Size and Age: Estimates for 100 Manufacturing Industries’,Journal of Industrial Economics 35, 567–581.
Gallagher, C., M. Day and J. Thomason, 1990, ‘The Growth of U.K. Companies 1985–87 and their Contribution to Job Generation’,The Employment Gazette, February.
Hart, P. and S. Prais, 1956, ‘The Analysis of Business Concentration: A Statistical Approach’,Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 119, 150–191.
Leonard, J. S., 1986, ‘On the Size Distribution of Employment and Establishments’,NBER Working Paper No. 1951.
Konings, J., 1994a, ‘Gross Job Creation and Gross Job Destruction in the U.K. Manufacturing Sector’,Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, forthcoming.
Konings, J., 1994b,Gross Job Flows and Wage Determination in the U.K.: Evidence from Firm Level Data, Ph.D. thesis, London School of Economics.
Millward, N. and M. Stevens, 1986,British Workplace Industrial Relations, 1980–84, Aldershot: Gower Press.
Millward, N., M. Stevens, D. Smart and W. R. Hawes, 1992,Workplace Industrial Relations in Transition, Dartmouth Publishers.
Pratten, C., 1991,The Competitiveness of Small Firms, Cambridge University Press.
Quah, D., 1993a, ‘Empirical Cross-Section Dynamics in Economic Growth’,European Economic Review 37, 426–434.
Quah, D., 1993b, ‘Galton's Fallacy and Tests of the Convergence Hypothesis’, LSE STICERD discussion paper.
Simon, H. A. and C. P. Bonini, 1958, ‘The Size Distribution of Business firms’,American Economic Review 48, 607–617.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This paper benefitted from seminars at the London School of Economics and Trinity College, Dublin. I thank A. Lamo, R. Koopmans, A. Manning, A. Oswald, C. Pissarides, D. Quah, H. Vandenbussche and an anonymous referee for helpful comments and discussions. All errors are mine.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Konings, J. Gross job flows and the evolution of size in U.K. establishments. Small Bus Econ 7, 213–220 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01135366
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01135366