Skip to main content
Log in

Ultrasonic wave scattering from rough, imperfect interfaces. Part II. Incoherent and coherent scattered fields

  • Published:
Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A theoretical model for ultrasonic wave scattering for geometrically irregular and imperfectly bonded interfaces is presented. Part I presents the stochastic interface characterization and a model for its mechanical response based on a micromechanics model of asperity contact. Part II uses this interface representation to write the well used “quasi-static” boundary conditions for scattering from a.flat imperfect interface1 directly on the irregular interface profile. The boundary conditions are then expanded in an asymptotic series in the roughness parameter (standard deviation of the surface height) which is small compared to wavelength. The slope of the profile must also be everywhere small. These equations are solved exactly for the zero-th and second order terms, which are the flat coherent solution and its' first coherent correction, and the first order term, which is the first term in the expansion for the incoherently scattered solution. Results for obliquely incident longitudinal and shear waves show a strong dependence on the roughness in both the coherent and incoherent reflected fields, but little if any dependence on the roughness in the transmitted fields. In particular, the reflected coherent fields show markedly increasing attenuation compared to the flat compliant interface with increasing roughness and increasing ultrasonic frequency, the latter result being in qualitative agreement with results for scattering from an inhomogeneous array of individual scatterers.2 There is evidence in the incoherent reflected fields for the existence of an incoherent leaky interface disturbance which manifests itself as a bulk incoherent shear wave at a scattering angle equal to the critical longitudinal angle. A coherent true interface wave is also supported by the rough interface which is shown to further attenuate the coherent reflected fields compared to the flat compliant interface solution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. M. Baik and R. B. Thompson, Ultrasonic scattering from imperfect interfaces: A quasi-static model,J. Nondestr. Eval. 4:177–196 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J. H. Rose, Ultrasonic reflectivity of diffusion bonds,Rev. Prog. Quant. NDE 8B:1925–1931 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. Pecorari, D. A. Mendelsohn, and L. Adler, Ultrasonic wave scattering from rough imperfect interfaces Part I: Stochastic interface models,J. Nondestr. Eval. 14: 109–116 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. W. Kuperman and H. Schmidt, Self-consistent perturbation approach to rough surface scattering in stratified elastic media,J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 86:1511–1522 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. K. Kendall and D. Tabor, An ultrasonic study of the area of contact between stationary and sliding surfaces,Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A323:321–340 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  6. W. Kuperman, Coherent component of specular reflection and transmission for rough surface scattering using a Gaussian roughness spectrum,J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 58:365–370 (1975).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. E. I. Thorsos and D. R. Jackson, The validity of the perturbation approximation for rough surface scattering using a Gaussian roughness spectrum,J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 86:261–277 (1989).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. C. Pecorari, Scattering of Ultrasonic Waves from Rough Imperfect Solid-Solid Interfaces, PhD thesis, The Ohio State University (1992).

  9. P. R. Nayak, Random process model of rough surface,J. Lubric. Technol. 93:398–407 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J. D. Achenbach, A. K. Gautesen, and H. McMaken,Ray Methods for Waves in Elastic Solids (Pitman Publishing Inc., Boston, 1982), p. 37.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. T. H. Gray, F. J. Margetan, and R. B. Thompson, Ultrasonic NDE techniques for integrally fabricated rotors,Rev. Prog. QNDE (Plenum Press, New York, 1988),7B:1327–1334.

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. S. Murty, A theoretical model for the attenuation and dispersion of Stonely waves at the loosely bonded interface of elastic halfspaces,Phys. Earth and Plan. Int. 11:65–79 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pecorari, C., Mendelsohn, D.A. & Adler, L. Ultrasonic wave scattering from rough, imperfect interfaces. Part II. Incoherent and coherent scattered fields. J Nondestruct Eval 14, 117–126 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01183117

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01183117

Key words

Navigation