Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Two approaches for truss topology optimization: a comparison for practical use

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
Structural optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses ground structure approaches for topology optimization of trusses. These topology optimization methods select an optimal subset of bars from the set of all possible bars defined on a discrete grid. The objectives used are based either on minimum compliance or on minimum volume. Advantages and disadvantages are discussed and it is shown that constraints exist where the formulations become equivalent. The incorporation of stability constraints (buckling) into topology design is important. The influence of buckling on the optimal layout is demonstrated by a bridge design example. A second example shows the applicability of truss topology optimization to a real engineering stiffened membrane problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achtziger, W. 1993: Optimierung von einfach und mehrfach belasteten Stabwerken.Bayreuther Mathematische Schriften,46, Dissertation

  • Achtziger, W. 1995: Truss topology optimization including bar properties different for tension and compression.Struct. Opt. (to appear)

  • Achtziger, W.; Bendsøe, M.P.; Ben-Tal, A.; Zowe, J. 1992: Equivalent displacement based formulations for maximum strength truss topology design.Impact Comp. Sci. Eng. 4, 315–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Barta, J. 1957: On minimum weight of certain redundant structures.Acta. Techn. Acad. Sci. Hung. 18, 67–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckers, M.; Fleury, C. 1994: A primal-dual approach in truss topology optimization. LTAS,Structures Aérospatiales, Universite de Liège, Rapport OA-34

  • Bendsøe, M.P. 1995:Methods for optimization of structural topology, shape and material. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendsøe, M.P.; Ben-Tal, A.; Zowe, J. 1994: Optimization methods for truss geometry and topology design.Struct. Optim. 7, 141–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, H.L. 1965:The design of structures for least weight. Oxford: Pergamon

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorn, W.S.; Gomory, R.E.; Greenberg, H.J. 1964: Automatic design of optimal structures.Journal de Mécanique 3, 25–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleron, P. 1964: The minimum weight of trusses.Bygnings statiske Meddelelser.35, 81–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerdes, D. 1994: Strukturoptimierung unter Anwendung der Optimalitätskriterien auf diskretisierte Fachwerke bei besonderer Berücksichtigung der Stabilität. Doctoral Thesis, FB 10, Essen University; also: VDI Verlag, Reihe 18, Nr. 171

  • Hemp, W.S. 1973:Optimum Structures. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Hörnlein, H.R.E.M. 1979: Ein Algorithmus zur Strukturoptimierung von Fachwerkkonstruktionen, DiplomarbeitLudwigs-Maximilian-Universität, München

  • Hörnlein, H.R.E.M. 1994: Topologieoptimierung von Stabstrukturen, VDI/WLZ-Seminar 32-63-08, RWTH, Aachen

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarre, F.; Kočvara, M.; Zowe, J., 1995: Interior point methods for mechanical design problems. Technical Report.The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Tokyo, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • Klarbring, A.; Petersson, J.; Rönnqvist, M. 1995: Truss topology optimization involving unilateral contact.Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications.87 (1)

  • Michell, A.G.M. 1904: The limits of economy of material in frame structures.Philosophical Magazine 8, 589–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, P. 1993: Topology optimization of three-dimensional trusses. In: Bendsøe, M.P.; Soares, C.A.Topology Design of Structures. pp. 19–30. Dordrecht: Kluwer

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozvany, G.I.N.; Bendsøe, M.P.; Kirsch, U. 1995: Layout optimization of structures. ASME Reprint No AMR159,Appl. Mech. Rev. 48

  • Sved, S. 1954: The minimum weight of certain redundant structures.Australian Journal of Applied Science 5, 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J.E.; Rossow, M.P. 1977: Optimal truss design based on an algorithm using optimality criteria.Int. J. Solids Struct. 13, 913–923

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, M.; Rozvany, G.I.N. 1992, 1993: DCOC: an optimality criteria method for large systems. Part I: theory. Part II: algorithms.Struct. Optim. 5, 12–25;6, 250–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Zotemantel, R. 1993: MBB-Lagrange: A computer aided structural design system. In: Hörnlein, H.; Schittkowski, K. (eds.)Software Systems for Structural Optimization, pp. 143–158. Basel, Boston, Berlin: Birkhäuser

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Scientific Software Consulting, 81371, Munich, Germany

    J. M. Oberndorfer

  2. Institute for Appl. Mathematics II, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91058, Erlangen, Germany

    W. Achtziger

  3. Aeroelastics Department, DASA, 81663, Munich, Germany

    H. R. E. M. Hörnlein

Authors
  1. J. M. Oberndorfer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. W. Achtziger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. H. R. E. M. Hörnlein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oberndorfer, J.M., Achtziger, W. & Hörnlein, H.R.E.M. Two approaches for truss topology optimization: a comparison for practical use. Structural Optimization 11, 137–144 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01197027

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01197027

Keywords

Search

Navigation