Abstract
The design sensitivities generated with the mesh velocity method, used by the authors, are compared with those obtained by the boundary layer and boundary displacement methods. The effect of adaptive mesh refinement and error control on the quality of the velocity fields is discussed, as well as their ability to yield accurate first-order predictions of constraint values. Two numerical shape optimization examples of a 2D and a 3D component are presented. These examples are used to illustrate the benefits of integrating analytical methods of design sensitivity analysis with parametric capabilities supported by state-of-the-art CAD systems.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beckers, P. 1991: Recent developments in shape sensitivity analysis: The physical approach.Eng. Opt. 18, 67–78
Bennett, J.A.; Botkin, M.E. 1985: Structural shape optimization with geometric description and adaptive mesh refinement.AIAA J. 23, 458–464
Botkin, M.E. 1982: Shape optimization of plate and shell structures.AIAA J. 20, 268–273
Botkin, M.E. 1992: Three-dimensional shape optimization using fully automatic mesh generation.AIAA J. 30, 1932–1934
Braibant, V.; Fleury, C. 1984: Shape optimal design using B-splines.Comp. Meth. App. Mech. Eng. 44, 247–267
Choi, K.K.; Chang, K.H. 1994: A study of design velocity field computation for shape optimal design.Fin. Elem. Anal. Des. 15, 317–341
Haug, E.J.; Choi, K.K.; Komkov, V. 1986:Design sensitivity analysis of structural systems. New York: Academic Press
Imam, M.H. 1982: Three-dimensional shape optimization.Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng. 18, 661–673
Intergraph Corporation 1993:EMS basics training guide. Huntsville, Alabama 35894-0001
Intergraph Corporation 1994:Intergraph/finite element modelling/solver (I/FEM) training guide. Huntsville, Alabama 35894-0001
Kodiyalam, S.; Parthasarathy, V.N. 1992: Optimized/adapted finite elements for structural shape optimization.Fin. Elem. Anal. Des. 12, 1–11
Kodiyalam, S.; Virendra, K.; Finnigan, P.M. 1992: Constructive solid geometry approach to three-dimensional structural shape optimization.AIAA J. 30, 1408–1415
Lindby, T.; Santos, J.L.T. 1994: Shape design sensitivity analysis and optimization with an existing associative CAD system. In:Proc. 5th AIAA/NASA/USAF/ISSMO Symp. on Multidiscip. and Struct. Optim. (held in Panama City, Fl), pp. 1483–1490
Matiak, G.; Schnack, E. 1995: Adaptivity in parametric design model for shape optimization problems.Computer aided design of structures IV, structural optimization, pp. 137–144. Computational Mechanics Publications
Santos, J.L.T.; Godse, M.M.; Chang, K.H. 1990: An interactive post-processor for structural design sensitivity analysis and optimization: sensitivity display and what-if study.Comp. & Struct. 35, 1–13
Schramm, U.; Pilkey, W.D. 1993: The coupling of geometric descriptions and finite elements using NURBs — a study in shape optimization.Fin. Elem. Anal. Des. 15, 11–34
Seong, H.G.; Choi, K.K. 1987: Boundary layer approach to shape design sensitivity analysis.Mech. Struct. Mach. 15, 241–263
Yang, R.J. 1989: A three-dimensional shape optimization system-shop 3D.Comp. & Struct. 31, 881–890
Yao, T.M.; Choi, K.K. 1989: 3-D shape optimal design and automatic finite element regridding.Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng. 28, 369–384
Zhang, W.H. 1992:Calcul des sensibilités et optimisation de forme par la methode des elements finits. Ph.D. Thesis, Université Poly technique Du Nord-Ouest, China (in French)
Zhang, W.H.; Beckers, P.; Fleury, C. 1995: A unified parametric design approach to structural shape optimization.Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng. 38, 2283–2292
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lindby, T., Santos, J.L.T. 2-D and 3-D shape optimization using mesh velocities to integrate analytical sensitivities with associative CAD. Structural Optimization 13, 213–222 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01197449
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01197449