Skip to main content
Log in

Approximation and derivatives of probabilities of survival in structural analysis and design

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
Structural optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Yield stresses, allowable stresses, moment capacities (plastic moments), external loadings, manufacturing errors, etc., are not fixed quantities in practice, but must be modelled as random variables with a certain joint probability distribution. In reliability-oriented structural optimization the violation of the random behavioural constraints are evaluated by means of the corresponding probabilityp s of survival. Hence, the approximative computation ofp s and its sensitivities is of utmost importance. After the consideration of lower bounds ofp s based on a selection of certain redundants in the vector of internal forces/bending moments, and the consideration of upper bounds ofp s based on an optimizational representation of the yield or safety constraints by a pair of dual linear programs, a conical representation ofp s is introduced based on a coneY o of admissible pairs of external loads/strength increaments. Approximations ofp s can be constructed then by replacing the (finitely generated) coneY o by more simple ones, e.g. spherical or ellipsoidal cones. For the direct numerical computation of sensitivities ofp s and its bounds or approximations by using e.g. sampling methods or asymptotic expansion techniques based on Laplace integral representation of multiple integrals, exact differentiation formulae — of arbitrary order — forp s and its bounds or approximations with respect to deterministic input or design variables are obtained by applying the transformation method/stochastic completion techniques; the derivatives ofp s are represented again by certain expectations or multiple integrals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnbjerg-Nielsen, T. 1991:Rigid-ideal plastic model as a reliability analysis tool for ductil structures. Ph.D. Dissertation, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby

    Google Scholar 

  • Augusti, G.; Baratta, A.; Casciati, F. 1984:Probabilistic methods in structural engineering. London: Chapman and Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjerager, P. 1990: On computation methods for structural reliability analysis.Struct. Safety 9, 79–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjerager, P.; Krenk, S. 1987: Sensitity measures in structural reliability analysis. In: Thoft-Christensen, P (ed.):Reliability and optimization of structural systems.Lecture Notes in Engineering 33, pp. 459–470. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjerager, P.; Krenk, S. 1989: Parameter sensitivity in first order reliability theory.J. Eng. Mech. Div. 115, 1577–1582

    Google Scholar 

  • Breitung, K. 1991: Parameter sensitivity of failure probabilities. In: Der Kiureghian, A.; Thoft-Christensen, P. (eds.):Reliability and optimization of structural system '90, Lecture Notes in Engineering 61, pp. 43–51. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, C.A. 1967: Bounds on the reliability of structural systems.J. Struct. Div., ASCE 93, 171–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Ditlevsen, O. 1979: Narrow reliability bounds for structural systems.J. Struct. Mech. 7, 453–472

    Google Scholar 

  • Ditlevsen, O.; Bjerager, P. 1984: Reliability of highly redundant plastic structures.J. Eng. Mech. 110, 671–693

    Google Scholar 

  • Frangopol, D.M. 1985: Sensitivity of reliability-based optimum design.J. Struct. Div. 111, 1703–1721

    Google Scholar 

  • Galambos, J. 1977: Bonferroni inequalities.The Annals of Probability 5, 577–581

    Google Scholar 

  • Haftka, R.T.; Gürdal, Z.; Kamat, M.P. 1990:Elements of structural optimization. Dordrecht-Boston-London: Kluwer

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, P.G. 1959:Plastic analysis of structures. New York: McGraw-Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, U. 1993:Structural optimization. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Kounias, E.G. 1968: Bounds for the probability of a union, with applications.The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 39, 2154–2158

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawo, M. 1987:Optimierung im konstruktiven Ingenieurbau. Braunschweig: Vieweg

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawo, M.; Thierauf, G. 1980:Stabtragwerke, Matrizenmethoden der Statik und Dynamik. Teil I: Statik. Brauschweig: F. Vieweg

    Google Scholar 

  • Marti, K. 1990: Stochastic optimization methods in structural mechanics.ZAMM 70, T742-T745

    Google Scholar 

  • Marti, K. 1994: Approximations and derivatives of probability functions. In: Anastassiou, G.; Rachev, S. (eds.)Approximation, probability, and related fields, pp. 367–377. New York: Plenum Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Marti, K. 1995a: Differentiation of probability functions: the transformation method.Comp. Math. Appl. 30, 361–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Marti, K. 1995b: Differentiation of probability functions arising in structural reliability. In: Rackwitz, R. (ed.)Reliability and optimization of structural systems, pp. 201–208. London: Chapman and Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Marti, K. 1995c: Computation of probability functions and its derivatives by means of orthogonal functions series expansions. In: Marti, K.; Kall, P. (eds.):Stoch. Prog.: numerical techniques and engineering applications.LNEMS 423, pp. 22–53. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Marti, K. 1996: Differentiation formulas for probability functions: the transformation method.Math. Prog., Series B 75, 201–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Nafday, A.M.; Corotis, R.B. 1987: Failure mode enumeration for system reliability assessment by optimization algorithms. In: Thoft-Christensen, P. (ed.)Reliability and optimization of structural systems.Lecture Notes in Engineering.33, pp. 297–306. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Neal, B.G. 1965:The plastic methods of structural analysis. London: Chapman and Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Rackwitz, R.; Cuntze, R. 1987: Formulations of reliability-oriented optimization.Eng. Opt. 11, 69–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozvany, G.I.N.; Bendsøe, M.P.; Kirsch, U. 1995: Layout optimization of structures.Appl. Mech. Reviews 48, 41–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Simoes, L.M.C. 1990: Stochastically dominant modes of frames by mathematical programming.J. Struct. Eng. 116, 1040–1060

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillers, W.R. 1972:Automated structural analysis: an introduction. New York, Toronto, Oxford: Pergamon

    Google Scholar 

  • Tin-Loi, F. 1990: On the optimal plastic synthesis of frames.Eng. Opt. 16, 91–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Tin-Loi, F. 1995: Plastic limit analysis of plane frames and grids using GAMS.Comp. & Struct. 54, 15–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, J.J.; Corotis, R.B.; Ellis, J.H. 1991: Stochastic programs for identifying significant collaps models in structural systems. In: Der Kiureghian, A.; Thoft-Christensen, P. (eds.)Reliability and optimization of structural systems '90, pp. 359–365. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marti, K. Approximation and derivatives of probabilities of survival in structural analysis and design. Structural Optimization 13, 230–243 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01197451

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01197451

Keywords

Navigation