Skip to main content
Log in

Choice and action

  • Published:
Journal of Evolutionary Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this essay, we argue that rational choice (RC) provides an inadequate foundation for a theory of economic action. After defining RC sufficiently broadly to encompass much of the bounded rationality literature as well as neoclassical optimization theory, we present three principal arguments against RC. The first is cognitive: economic actors are experts at what they do, and the cognitive processes that underlie experitise are not consistent with RC, descriptively, prescriptively or positively. The second argument begins with the observation that economic action takes place in and through relationships between agents, and these relationships may generate actions that connot be localized to individual agents. We argue that these generative relationships are essential to understanding such fundamental economic phenomena as innovation, and the actions that result from them are not amenable to analysis from a RC perspective. Finally, we argue that most economic agents lack the judgement and execution coherence required by RC. In a companion paper, we propose an alternative foundation for a theory of economic action that builds on the critique of RC presented in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arthur WB (1994) Bounded rationality and inductive reasoning. Amer Econ Review (Papers and Proceedings) 84: 406–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter C, Scardamalia M (1993) Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago: Open Court

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi M, Glaser R, Farr M (1988) The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio A (1994) Descartes' error: Emotion, reason and the human mind. New York: Grossett/Putnam

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus H, Dreyfus S (1986) Mind over machine: the power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. New York: Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman G (1992) Bright air and brilliant fire: On the matter of the mind. New York: Basic Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Elman J (1990) Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science 14: 179–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson R, Smith J (1991) Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland J, Holyoak K, Nisbet R, Thagard P (1986) Induction: Processes of inference, learning, and discovery. Cambridge: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohonen T (1977) Associative memory: A system theoretical approach. Berlin: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff G (1992) Metaphor and war: The metaphor system used to justify war in the gulf (inpublished manuscript)

  • Leifer E (1991) Actors as observers: A theory of skill in social relationships. New York: Garland

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis A (1985) On effectively computable realization of choice functions. Mathematical Social Sciences 10: 43–80

    Google Scholar 

  • March J (1994) A primer on decision making. NY: Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson R, Winter S (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Padgett J, Ansell C (1993) Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 1400–1434. American Journal of Sociology 98: 1259–1319

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay F (1926) Truth and probability. In: The foundations of mathematics, chapt. VII. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabel C, Zeitlin J (1993) Stories, strategies, structures: Rethinking historical alternatives to mass production. In: Sabel and Zeitlin (eds) Worlds of possibility: Flexibility and mass production in Western industrialization, to appear

  • Savage L (1954) Foundations of statistics. New York: John Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanteau J (1992) The psychology of experts: An alternative view. In: Wright and Bolger (eds) Experitise and decision support, pp. 11–23, New York: Plenum Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman L (1987) Plans and situated action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton R (1988) Learning to predict by the method of temporal differences. Machine Learning 3: 9–44

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hofsten C (1980) Predictive reaching for moving objects by human infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 30: 369–382

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hofsten C (1987) Catching. In: Heuer H, Sanders A (eds) Perspectives on perception and action, pp. 33–46. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson O (1985) The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright G, Bolger F (1992) Expertise and decison support. New York: Plenum Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Lane.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lane, D., Malerba, F., Maxfield, R. et al. Choice and action. J Evol Econ 6, 43–76 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01202372

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01202372

Keywords

Navigation