Skip to main content
Log in

Convergence of trust region augmented Lagrangian methods using variable fidelity approximation data

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
Structural optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To date the primary focus of most constrained approximate optimization strategies is that application of the method should lead to improved designs. Few researchers have focused on the development of constrained approximate optimization strategies that are assured of converging to a Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) point for the problem. Recent work by the authors based on a trust region model management strategy has shown promise in managing the convergence of constrained approximate optimization in application to a suite of single level optimization test problems. Using a trust-region model management strategy, coupled with an augmented Lagrangian approach for constrained approximate optimization, the authors have shown in application studies that the approximate optimization process converges to a KKT point for the problem. The approximate optimization strategy sequentially builds a cumulative response surface approximation of the augmented Lagrangian which is then optimized subject to a trust region constraint. In this research the authors develop a formal proof of convergence for the response surface approximation based optimization algorithm. Previous application studies were conducted on single level optimization problems for which response surface approximations were developed using conventional statistical response sampling techniques such as central composite design to query a high fidelity model over the design space. In this research the authors extend the scope of application studies to include the class of multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) test problems. More importantly the authors show that response surface approximations constructed from variable fidelity data generated during concurrent subspace optimization (CSSOs) can be effectively managed by the trust region model management strategy. Results for two multidisciplinary test problems are presented in which convergence to a KKT point is observed. The formal proof of convergence and the successful MDO application of the algorithm using variable fidelity data generated by CSSO are original contributions to the growing body of research in MDO.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

k :

Lagrangian iteration

s :

approximate minimization iteration

i, j, l :

variable indices

m :

number of inequality constraints

n :

number of design variables

p :

number of equality constraints

f(x):

objective function

g(x):

inequality constraint vector

g j (x):

j-th inequality constraint

h(x):

equality constraint vector

h j (x):

i-th equality constraint

c(x):

generalized constraint vector

c i (x):

i-th generalized constraint

c 1,c 2,c 3,c 4 :

real constants

m(x):

approximate model

q(x):

approximate model

q(x):

piecewise approximation

r p :

penalty parameter

t, t 1,t 2 :

step size length

x:

design vector, dimensionn

x l :

l-th design variable

xU :

upper bound vector, dimensionn

x Ul :

l-th design upper bound

xL :

lower bound vector, dimensionn

x Ll :

l-th design lower bound

B :

approximation of the Hessian

K :

constraints residual

S :

design space

β, β1, β2, κ:

scalars

ε1, ε2 :

convergence tolerances

γ0, γ1, γ2, η, μ:

trust region parameters

λ:

Lagrange multiplier vector, dimensionm+p

λ i :

i-th Lagrange multiplier

ρ:

trust region ratio

Ψ(x):

alternative form for inequality constraints

Φ(x, λ,r p ):

augmented Lagrangian function

\(\tilde \Phi (x,\lambda ,r_p )\) :

approximation of the augmented Lagrangian function

ϒ:

fidelity control

‖.‖:

Euclidean norm

〈,〉:

inner product

∇:

gradient operator with respect to design vector x

P(y(x)):

projection operator; projects the vector y onto the set of feasible directions at x

Δ:

trust region radius

Δx:

step size

References

  • Alexandrov, N.; Dennis, J.E. 1997: A class of general trust-region multilevel algorithms for systems of nonlinear equations and equality constrained optimization: global convergence theory.SIAM J. Optimiz. (submitted)

  • Alexandrov, N. 1996: Robustness properties of a trust region framework for managing approximations in engineering optimization.Proc. 6-th AIAA/NASA/USAF Multidisciplinary Analysis & Optimization Symp. (held in Bellevue, WA), Paper 96-4102, pp. 1056–1059

  • Balabanov, V.; Kaufman, M.; Knill, D.L.; Haim, D.; Golovidov, O.; Giunta, A.A.; Haftka, R.T.; Grossman, B.; Mason, W.H.;

  • Watson, L.T. 1996: Dependence of optimal structural weight on aerodynamic shape for a high speed civil transport.Proc. 6-th AIAA/NASA/USAF Multidisciplinary Analysis & Optimization Symp. (held in Bellevue WA), Paper 96-4046, pp. 599–613

  • Bloebaum, C.L.; Hong, W., Peck, A 1994: Improved moved limit strategy for approximate optimization.Proc. 5-th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symp. (held in Panama City, FL), Paper 94-4337-CP, pp. 843–850

  • Burgee, S.; Giunta, A.; Balabanov, V.; Grossman, B.; Mason, W.H.; Narducci, R.; Haftka, R.T.; Watson, L.T. 1996: A coarse grained parallel variable-complexity multidisciplinary optimization paradigm.Int. J. Supercomputer Appl. High Performance Comput. 10, 269–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W.; Allen, J.K.; Schrage, D.P.; Mistree, F. 1996: Statistical experimentation for affordable concurrent design.Proc. 6-th AIAA/NASA/USAF Multidisciplinary Analysis & Optimization Symp. (held in Bellevue, WA), Paper 96-4085, pp. 921–930

  • Chen, W.; Simpson, T.W.; Allen, J.K.; Mistree, F. 1996: Using design capability indices to satisfy sets of design requirements.Proc. 1996 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conf. and Computers in Engineering Conf. (held in Irvine, CA), Paper 96-DETC/DAC-1090, CD-ROM Proc., ISBN 0-7918-1234-4

  • Chen, W.; Tsui, K.L.; Allen, J.K.; Mistree, F. 1995: Integration of the response surface methodology with the compromise decision support problem in developing a general robust design procedure.Proc. 1995 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conf., Advances in Design Automation (held in Boston, MA), ASME DE-Vol. 82, pp. 485–492 (eds. S. Azarmaet al.)

  • Chen, T.Y. 1993: Calculation of the move limits for the sequential linear programming method.Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engrg. 36, 2661–2679

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Conn, A.R.; Gould, N.I.M.; Toint, Ph.L. 1988a: Global convergence of a class of trust region algorithms for optimization with simple bounds.SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 25, 433–464

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Conn, A.R.; Gould, N.I.M.; Toint, Ph.L. 1988b: Testing a class of methods for solving minimization problems with simple bounds on the variables.Mathematics of Computation 50, 399–430

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Conn, A.R.; Gould, N.I M.; Toint, Ph.L. 1991: A globally convergent augmented Lagrangian algorithm for optimization with general constraints and simple bounds.SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 28, 545–572

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Conn, A.R.; Gould, N.I.M.; Toint, Ph.L. 1992: LANCELOT, a FORTRAN package for large-scale nonlinear optimization.Springer Series in Computational Mathematics 17. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, J.E.; Torczon, T. 1996: Approximation model management for optimization.Proc. 6-th AIAA/NASA/USAF Multidisciplinary Analysis & Optimization Symp. (held in Bellevue, WA), Paper 96-4046, pp. 1044–1046

  • Fadel, G.M.; Riley, M.F.; Barthelemy, J.F.M. 1990: Two point exponential approximation method for structural optimization.Struct. Optim. 2, 117–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giunta, A.; Balabanov, V.; Kaufman, M.; Burgee, S.; Grossman, B.; Haftka, R.T.; Mason, W.H.; Watson, L.T. 1996: Variable-complexity response surface design of an HSCT configuration. In: Alexandrov, N.M.; Hussaini, M.Y. (eds.)Multidisciplinary design optimization, pp 348–367. Philadelphia: SIAM

    Google Scholar 

  • Giunta, A.A.; Dudley, J.M.; Narducci, R.; Grossman, B.; Haftka, R.T.; Mason, W.H.; Watson, L.T. 1994: Noisy aerodynamic response and smooth approximations in HSCT design.Proc. 5-th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Sympo. (held in Panama City, FL), Paper 94-4376, pp. 1117–1128

  • Grace, A. 1992:Optimization toolbox for use with MATHLAB. Natick, MA: The Math Works, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grignon, P.; Venkatesh V.; Fadel, G.M. 1994: Funzzy move limit evaluation in structural optimization.5-th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Conf. on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization (held in Panama City, FL), Paper 94-4281

  • Hestenes M.R. 1969: Multiplier and gradient methods.J. Optimiz. Theory & Appl. 4, 303–320

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Himmelblau, D.M. 1972:Applied nonlinear programming. New York: McGraw Hill

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • IMSL MATH/LIBRARY.Fortran subroutines for mathematical applications, Vol III. Houston, TX

  • Koch, P.N.; Barlow, A.; Allen, J.K.; Mistree, F. 1996: Configuring turbine propulsion systems using robust concept exploration.Proc. 1996 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conf. and Computers in Engineering Conf. (held in Irvine, CA), Paper 96-DETC/DAC-1472, CD-ROM Proc., ISBN 0-7918-1234-4

  • Lautenschlager, U.; Eschenauer, H.A.; Mistree, F. 1996: Components of turbo systems—A proposal for finding better layouts.Proc. 6-th AIAA/NASA/USAF Multidisciplinary Analysis & Optimization Symp. (held in Bellevue, WA), Paper 96-4096, pp. 1025–1035

  • Lewis, R.M. 1996: A trust region framework for managing approximation models in engineering optimization.Proc. 6-th AIAA/NASA/USAF Multidisciplinary Analysis & Optimization Symp. (held in Bellevue, WA), Paper 96-4101, pp. 1053–1055

  • Pourazady, M.; Fu, Z. 1996: Integrated approach to structural shape optimization.Comp. & Struct. 60, 279–289

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Renaud, J.E.; Gabriele, G.A. 1991: Sequential global approximation in non-hierarchic system decomposition and optimization. In: Gabriel, G. (ed.)Advances in design automation, Design automation and design optimization,ASME Publication DE-Vol. 32-1, pp. 191–200, 19-th Design Automation Conf. (held in Miami, FL)

  • Renaud, J.E.; Gabriele, G.A. 1993: Improved coordination in nonhierarchic system optimization.AIAA J. 31, 2367–2373

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Renaud, J.E.; Gabriele, G.A. 1994: Approximation in nonhierarchic system optimization.AIAA J. 32, 198–205

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rockafellar, R.T. 1973: The multiplier method of Hestenes and Powell applied to convex programming.J. Optimiz. Theory & Appl. 12, 555–562

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, J.F.; Renaud, J.E.; Watson, L.T. 1997: Trust region augmented Lagrangian methods for sequential response surface approximation and optimization.Proc. ASME Design Engineering Technical Conf. (held in Sacramento, CA), Paper DETC97/DAC3773

  • Roux, W.J.; Stander, N.; Haftka, R.T. 1996: Response surface approximations for structural optimization.Proc. 6-th AIAA/NASA/USAF Multidisciplinary Analysis & Optimization Symp. (held in Bellevue, WA), Paper 96-4042, 1053–1055

  • Sellar, R.S. 1997:Multidisciplinary design using artificial neural networks for discipline coordination and system optimization. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Notre Dame

  • Sellar, R.S.; Batill, S.M. 1996: Concurrent subspace optimization using gradient-enhanced neural network approximations.Proc. 6-th AIAA/NASA/USAF Multidisciplinary Analysis & Optimization Symp. (held in Bellevue, WA), Paper 96-4019, pp. 319–330

  • Sellar, R.S.; Batill, S.M.; Renaud, J.E. 1994: Mixed discrete/continuous optimization of aircraft systems using neural networks.Proc. 5-th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symp. (held in Panama City, FL), Paper 94-4348, pp. 910–921

  • Sellar, R.S.; Batill, S.M.; Renaud, J.E. 1996: A neural networkbased, concurrent subspace optimization approach to multidisciplinary design optimization.34-th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting (held in Reno, NV), Paper 96-1383

  • Sellar, R.S.; Stelmack, M.A.; Batill, S.M.; Renaud, J.E. 1996: Multidisciplinary design and analysis of an integrated aeroelastic/propulsive system.37-th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and materials Conf. (held in Salt Lake City, UT), Paper 96-1383, 583–594

  • Shankar, J.; Ribbens, C.J.; Haftka, R.T.; Watson, L.T. 1993: Computational study of a nonhierarchical decomposition algorithm.Comput. Optim. Appl. 2, 273–293

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson T.W.; Chen, W.; Allen, J.K.; Mistree, F. 1996: Conceptual design of a family of products through the use of the robust exploration method.Proc. 6-th AIAA/NASA/USAF/Multidisciplinary Analysis & Optimization Symp. (held in Bellevue, WA), Paper 96-4161, pp. 1535–1545

  • Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J. 1988: Optimization by decomposition: a step from hierarchic to non-hierarchic systems.2-nd NASA/Air Force Symp. on Recent Advances in Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization (held in Hampton, VA). NASA Conf. Publication 3031, Part 1. 28–30

  • Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J. 1990: Sensitivity of complex, internally coupled systems.AIAA J. 28

  • Swift, R.A.; Batill, S.M. 1991: Application of neural networks to preliminary structural design.Proc. AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC 32-nd Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conf. (held in Baltimore, Maryland), pp. 335–343

  • Swift, R.A.; Batill, S.M. 1992a: Simulated annealing utilizing neural networks for discrete variable optimization problems in structural design.AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC 33rd Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conf. (held in Dallas, TX) Paper No. 92-2311-CP.

  • Swift, R.A.; Batill, S.M. 1992b: Damage tolerant structural design using neural networks.AIAA Aerospace Design Conf. and Exhibit (held in Irvine, CA), Paper No. 92-1097-CP

  • Swift, R.A.; Batill, S.M. 1993: Structural design space definition using neural networks and a reduced knowledge base.AIAA/AHS/ASEE Aerospace Design Conf. (held in Irvine, CA), Paper No. 93-1034-CP

  • Thomas, H.L.; Vanderplaats, G.N.; Shyy, Y.K. 1992: A study of move limit adjustment strategies in the approximation concepts approach to structural synthesis.Proc. 4-th AIAA/USAF/NASA/OAI Symp. on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization (held in Cleveland, OH), pp. 507–512

  • Venter, G.; Haftka, R.T.; Starnes, J.H. 1996: Construction of response surfaces for design optimization applications.Proc. 6-th AIAA/NASA/USAF Multidisciplinary Analysis & Optimization Symp. (held in Bellevue, WA), Paper 96-4040, pp. 548–564

  • Wujek, B.A.; Renaud, J.E.; Batill, S.M. 1997: A concurrent engineering approach for multidisciplinary design in a distributed computing environment. In: Alexandrov, N.; Hussaini, M.Y. (eds.)Multidisciplinary design optimizations: state-of-the-art, Proc. in Applied Mathematics 80, pp. 189–208. Philadelphia: SIAM

    Google Scholar 

  • Wujek, B.A.; Renaud, J.E.; Batill, S.M.; Brockman, J.B. 1996: Concurrent subspace optimization using design variable sharing in a distributed computing environment.Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications (CERA). Lancaster, PA: Technomic Publishing Company

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rodríguez, J., Renaud, J. & Watson, L. Convergence of trust region augmented Lagrangian methods using variable fidelity approximation data. Structural Optimization 15, 141–156 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01203525

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01203525

Keywords

Navigation