Abstract
A monoidS is susceptible to having properties bearing upon all right acts overS such as: torsion freeness, flatness, projectiveness, freeness. The purpose of this note is to find necessary and sufficient conditions on a monoidS in order that, for example, all flat rightS-acts are free. We do this for all meaningful variants of such conditions and are able, in conjunction with the results of Skornjakov [8], Kilp [5] and Fountain [3], to describe the corresponding monoids, except in the case “all torsion free acts are flat”, where we have only some necessary condition. We mention in passing that homological classification of monoids has been discussed by several authors [3, 4, 5, 8].
In the following,S will always stand for a monoid. A rightS-act is a setA on whichS acts unitarily from the right in the usual way, that is to saya(rs) = (ar)s, a1 =a (a εA,r,s εS) where 1 denotes the identity ofS.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. H. Clifford andG. B. Preston, The algebraic theory of semigroups, Vol. I, II. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, 1961, 1967.
E. H. Feller andR. L. Gantos, Indecomposable and injectiveS-systems with zero. Math. Nachr.41, 37–48 (1969).
J. Fountain, Perfect semigroups. Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc. (2)20, 87–93 (1976).
J. R. Isbell, Perfect monoids. Semigroup Forum2, 95–118 (1971).
M. Kilp, On the homological classification of monoids. Sibir. Matem. Z.13, 578–586 (1972) (Russian).
U. Knauer, Projectivity of acts and Morita equivalence of monoids. Semigroup Forum3, 359–370 (1972).
W. R. Nico, A study of operands in terms of maximal generalized orbits. Semigroup Forum6, 69–74 (1973).
L. A.Skornjakov, On homological classification of monoids. Sibir. Matem. Z. 10, 1139–1143 (Russian).
B. Stenström, Flatness and localization over monoids. Math. Nachr.48, 315–334 (1971).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Knauer, U., Petrich, M. Characterization of monoids by torsion-free, flat, projective, and free acts. Arch. Math 36, 289–294 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01223703
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01223703