Skip to main content
Log in

Stabilization of finite difference methods of numerical integration

  • Published:
Celestial mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To examine the stabilizing effects of a modification of the classical finite difference methods of numerical integration the differential equations of perturbed Keplerian motion are integrated for two examples: an artificial satellite of the Earth, and Hill's variation orbit. The modified methods remove much of the instability that is inherent to the classical methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bettis, D. G.: 1970, ‘Numerical Integration of Products of Fourier and Ordinary Polynomials,’,Num. Math. 14.

  • Brouwer, D. and Clemence, G. M.: 1961,Methods of Celestial Mechanics, Academic Press.

  • Hill, G. W.: 1878, ‘Researches in the Lunar Theory’,Am. J. Math. 1.

  • Henrici, P.: 1962,Discrete Variable Methods in Ordinary Differential Equations, Wiley.

  • Kustaanheimo, P. and Stiefel, E.: 1965, ‘Perturbation Theory of Kepler Motion Based on Spinor Regularization’,J. Reine Angew. Math. 218.

  • Stiefel, E. and Bettis, D. G.: 1969, ‘Stabilization of Cowell's Method’,Num. Math. 13.

  • Stiefel, E., Rössler, M., Waldvogel, J., and Burdet, C. A.: 1967, ‘Methods of Regularization for Computing Orbits in Celestial Mechanics’, NASA CR-769, Washington, D.C.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bettis, D.G. Stabilization of finite difference methods of numerical integration. Celestial Mechanics 2, 282–295 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01235122

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01235122

Keywords

Navigation