Skip to main content
Log in

Tax competition in a Bertrand model

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We show that in Bertrand models pure-strategy equilibria exist only under extraordinarily restrictive assumptions. We analyze tax competition between two countries for foreign investment. In the symmetric case of equal gross profits of the firms, zero-taxation is the unique equilibrium in pure strategies. If gross profits differ between countries only ∈-equilibria can exist. However, if the tax rate applies to foreign investment as well as to domestic sources no equilibria exist in pure strategies. The same holds true if countries compete for firms that differ in gross profit opportunities, unless extremely unrealistic conditions are met.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, B., and Hellwig, M. (1986): “Bertrand-Edgeworth Oligopoly in Large Markets.”Review of Economic Studies 53: 175–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann, M. (1965): “Edgeworth-Bertrand Duopoly Revisited.” InOperation Research Verfahren: Methods of Operations Research III, edited by R. Henn. Meisenheim am Glan: Anton Hain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, J. (1883): “Théorie des richesses.” (Review of A. Cournot'sRecherches sur les principes mathématiques de la théorie des richesses, Paris 1883.)Journal des Savants 48: 499–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, E., and Samuelson, L. (1989): “Strategic Behaviour and the Rules for International Taxation of Capital.”Economic Journal 99: 1099–1111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G., and Buchanan, J. (1980):The Power to Tax: Analytical Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crooks, E., Devereux, M., Pearson, M., and Wookey, C. (1989): “Transnational Tax Rates and Incentives to Invest.” Report no. 35, Institute of Fiscal Studies, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P., and Maskin, E. (1986a): “The Existence of Equilibrium in Discontinuous Economic Games, vol. I: Theory.”Review of Economic Studies 53: 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1986b): “The Existence of Equilibrium in Discontinuous Economic Games, vol. II: Applications.”Review of Economic Studies 53: 27–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devereux, M., and Pearson, M. (1989): “Corporate Tax Harmonisation and Economic Efficiency.” Report no. 35, Institute for Fiscal Studies, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, P. A., and Mirrlees, J. A. (1971): “Optimal Taxation and Public Production, I: Production Efficiency.”American Economic Review 61: 8–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudey, M. (1992): “Dynamic Edgeworth-Bertrand Competition.”Quarterly Journal of Economics 107: 1461–1477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgeworth, F. (1925): “The Pure Theory of Monopoly.” In: Edgeworth, F.,Papers Relating to Political Economy, vol. I. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. (1986):Game Theory with Applications to Economics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersovitz, M. (1987): “The Effects of Domestic Taxes on Foreign Private Investment.” Inthe Theory of Taxation for Developing Countries, edited by D. Newbery and N. Stern. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giovannini, A., and Hines, J. R. Jr. (1991): “Capital Flight and Tax Competition: Are There Viable Solutions to Both Problems?” InEuropean Financial Integration, edited by A. Giovannini and C. Mayer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goode, R. (1984):Government Finance in Developing Countries. Washington: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. H. (1990): “Can Capital Income Taxes Survive in Open Economies?” Working Paper no. 3416, NBER, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, S. (1984):Taxation for Development: Principles and Applications. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, J., and Tulkens, H. (1990): “Strategic Use of Tax Rates and Credits in a Model of International Corporate Income Tax Competition.” Discussion Paper no. 9073, CORE, Louvain-la-Neuve.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishkin, F. (1988): “Understanding Real Interest Rates.”American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70: 1064–1072.

    Google Scholar 

  • Razin, A., and Sadka, E. (1991a): “International Tax Competition and Gains from Tax Harmonization.”Economics Letters 37: 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1991b): “Efficient Investment Incentives in the Presence of Capital Flight.”Journal of International Economics 31: 171–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. M., and Eden, L. (eds.) (1985):Multinationals and Transfer Pricing. New York: St. Martin's.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, P. B. (1989): “Tax Harmonization in the European Community: Problems and Prospects.” Mimeo, Institute of Economics, Copenhagen Business School.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schulze, G.G., Koch, KJ. Tax competition in a Bertrand model. Zeitschr. f. Nationalökonomie 59, 193–215 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01238969

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01238969

Keywords

Navigation