Skip to main content
Log in

Reinnervation of the transplanted vas deferens: differential recovery of various biochemical and pharmacological parameters

  • Full Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Neural Transmission / General Section JNT Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Biochemical and pharmacologcial parameters were used to follow the innervation characteristics of the rat was deferens transplanted (T) to the caecum. After about 5 months, a regeneration of autonomic nerves was clearly shown: first, by a complete recovery of neuronal uptake, indicated by: a) potentiation by cocaine of epinephrine (EPI) dose-response curves (T=1.47±0.25, controls (C)=1.50±0.14 log units); b) reversion to normal levels of pD2 values for norepinephrine (NE) and EPI (T=6.6.±0.1; 7.0±0.1, and C=6.4±0.1; 6.9±0.1, respectively); second, a partial restoration of nerve terminals, and corresponding pools of NE, which was seen through histofluorescence and was indicated by a percent increase of: a) NE content, 47% (T=3.8±0.8, C=8.5±0.7 =μg/g); b) dopamine-β-hydroxylase (DBH) activity, 37% (T=136±80, C=364±15 nmol(hr.g); c) release of NE by 57 mM-potassium, 23% (T=33.0±12.0, C=147±14 ng/g. 5 min). Yet, two peculiarities of denervated organs remained practically unchanged even after 5-month transplantation: NE supersensitivity, measured by the relative responsiveness (p) ratio (T=0.96±0.02, C=0.69±0.03), and tyramine-induced contraction, that was recovered by only 14% (T=10.0±2.4, C=72.0±3.5 mm). This differential recovery of the forementioned parameters is discussed in the light of receptor mechanisms and functional changes following reinnervation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anton AH, Sayre DF (1962) A study of the factors affecting the aluminum oxide-trihydroxyndole procedure for the analysis of catecholamines. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 138: 360–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnstock G (1981) Development of smooth muscle and its innervation: In: Bulbring E, Brading AF, Jones AW, Tomita T (eds) Smooth muscle: an assessment of current knowledge. Edward Arnold, London, pp 431–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnstock G (1986) The changing face of autonomic neurotransmission. Acta Physiol Scand 126: 67–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Falck B (1962) Observations on the possibilities of the cellular localization of monoamines by a fluorescence method. Acta Physiol Scand 56: 2–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Festing MFW (1980) International index of laboratory animals. Medical Research Council, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry DP, Starman BJ, Johnson DG, Williams RH (1975) A sensitive radioenzymatic assay for norepinephrine in tissues and plasma. Life Sci 16: 375–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurkiewicz NH, Jurkiewicz A (1976) Dual effect of α-adrenoceptor antagonists in rat isolated vas deferens. Br J Pharmacol 56: 169–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurkiewicz NH, Jurkiewicz A, Gomes CB, Aucelio JG (1977) Pharmacodynamic analysis of the rat isolated vas deferens after transplantation to intestinal wall. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 203: 112–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirpekar SM, Wakade AR, Prat JC (1970) Regeneration of sympathetic nerves to the vas deferens and spleen of the cat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 175: 197–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirpekar SM (1975) Factors influencing transmission at adrenergic synapses. Prog Neurobiol 4: 163–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein RL (1982) Chemical composition of the large noradrenergic vesicles. In: Klein RL, Lagercrants H, Zimmermann H (eds) Neurotransmitter vesicles. Academic Press, New York, pp 133–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmfors T, Olson L (1967) Adrenergic reinnervation of anterior chamber transplants. Acta Physiol Scand 71: 401–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmfors T, Furness JB, Campbell GR, Burnstock G (1971) Reinnervation of smooth muscle of the vas deferens transplanted into the anterior chamber of the eye. J Neurobiol 2: 193–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins T, Valle JR, Porto A (1940) Estudo morfologico e funcional de enxertos de orgãos genitais accessorios de ratos e cobaios em diversas condições hormonais. Mem Inst Butantan (São Paulo)14: 137–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Molinoff PB, Weinshilboum R, Axelrod J (1971) A sensitive enzymatic assay for dopamine β-hydroxylase. J Pharmacol Exp Ther178: 425–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Rand MJ, McCulloch MW, Story DF (1980) Catecholamine receptors in nerve terminals. In: Szekeres L (ed) Adrenergic activators and inhibitors. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 223–266 (Handbook Exp Pharmacol 54/1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor GW, Cochran GC (1967) In: Statistical methods, 6th edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Westfall DP, Fedan JS (1975) The effect of pretreatment with 6-hydroxydopamine on the norepinephrine concentration and sensitivity of the rat vas deferens. Eur J Pharmacol 33: 413–417

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jurkiewicz, N.H., Jurkiewicz, A. & Garcia, A.G. Reinnervation of the transplanted vas deferens: differential recovery of various biochemical and pharmacological parameters. J. Neural Transmission 85, 83–94 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01244701

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01244701

Keywords

Navigation