Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Single unit activity in the peripheral lateral line system of the cichlid fishSarotherodon niloticus L.

  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The activities of single afferent fibers were recorded in the trunk lateral line nerve of the cichlid fishSarotherodon niloticus L. Using both electrophysiological recordings and neuroanatomical tracing techniques, the number, arrangement, and innervation of superficial (SNs) and canal (CNs) neuromasts were determined. Both, SNs and CNs, are innervated by several afferent fibers of different diameters and efferent fibers. The CNs and SNs are neuronally separated: afferent fibers which innervate both CNs and SNs were not found. Whereas the single CN is innervated by a separate set of afferent fibers, fibers innervating the SNs within rows often branched to reach all or several SNs. The SNs within a row were thus considered to form a functional unit. With the exception of SNs on the tail fin, functional units of neuromasts were in general topographically restricted to single scales.

The majority of lateral line units had resting activity. On the basis of the time interval distribution of the resting activity, 4 types of units were classified: these were labelled irregular (type I), regular (type II), bimodal (type III) and silent (type IV). Type I was the most common type of resting activity (obtained in 47.8% of the recorded units). Units with this resting activity type were identified as afferents innervating either SNs or CNs. Units with resting activity of type II represented mostly afferents of CNs if their mean activity was high (around 40 imp/s). If the mean activity of this type was below 20 imp/s the units were unresponsive to local water movements and at least some were identified as efferent fibers. Resting activity of type III was found only in units originating from CNs. Only 4% of the units were silent (type IV). These units were often identified as injured neuromasts. Units originating from CNs show higher mean resting activity than those from SNs. For both SN and CN units, the mean discharge rate of the resting activity correlated with the sensitivity to stimulation for sinusoidal water movements.

During stimulation of the neuromasts by sinusoidal water movements of small amplitude and different frequencies, the response characteristics of SN and CN units were determined by linear frequency analysis under steady state conditions. Most units responded linearly to small stimulus amplitudes. In this amplitude range the units' resting activity was modulated according to the stimulus frequency. Small stimulus amplitudes proportionally changed the amount of modulation but did not alter the phase of the response. CN and SN units that responded linearly produce differing frequency responses. Whereas CNs were most sensitive at frequencies of up to 200 Hz (center frequencies between 100 and 200 Hz), the center frequencies of SNs were distributed between 10 and 70 Hz with a maximum number at about 30 Hz. Bode plots for many CN and SN units indicated that the neuromasts were sensitive to the acceleration component of the water movement.

The functional significance of the differences between the two types of lateral line neuromasts (SNs and CNs) were discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

SN :

superficial neuromast

CN :

canal neuromast

References

  • Alnaes E (1973) Two types of lateral line afferents in the eel (Anguilla anguilla). Acta Physiol Scand 87:535–548

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell CC (1981) Central distribution of octavolateral afferents and efferents in a teleost (Mormyridae). J Comp Neurol 182:391–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleckmann H (1980) Reaction time and stimulus frequency in prey localisation in the surface feeding fishAplocheilus lineatus. J Comp Physiol 140:163–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleckmann H, Topp G (1981) Surface wave sensitivity of the lateral line organs of the TopminnowAplocheilus lineatus R. Naturwissenschaften 67:624

    Google Scholar 

  • Claas B, Münz H (1980) Bonyfish lateral line efferent neurons identified by retrograde axonal transport of horseradish peroxidase (HRP). Brain Res 193:249–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Claas B, Münz H (1981) Projection of lateral line afferents in a teleost's brain. Neurosci Lett 23:278–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Claas B, Fritzsch B, Münz H (1981) Common efferents to the lateral line and labyrinthine hair cells in aquatic vertebrates. Neurosci Lett 27:231–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark AL, Hobbiger F, Terrar DA (1983) Effects of pancuronium and hexamethonium on paraoxon-induced twitch potentiation and antidromic firing in rat phrenic nerve diaphragm preparations. Br J Pharmacol 80:489–496

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkgraaf S (1934) Untersuchungen über die Funktion der Seitenorgane an Fischen. Z Vergl Physiol 20:162–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkgraaf S (1952) Bau und Funktion der Seitenorgane und des Ohrlabyrinths bei Fischen. Experientia 7:205–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkgraaf S (1963) The functioning and significance of the lateral-line organs. Biol Rev 38:51–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Disler N (1960) Lateral line sense organs and their importance in fish behavior. Acad Sci USSR (transl. Israel Progr. for Sci Transl. Jerusalem 1971)

  • Enger PS (1963) Single unit activity in the peripheral auditory system of a teleost fish. Acta Physiol Scand (Suppl 3) 59:9–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Fay RR (1981) Coding of acoustic information in the eighth nerve. In: Tavolga WN, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) Hearing and sound communication in fishes. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 189–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Fay RR (1984) The goldfish ear codes the axes of acoustic particle motion in three dimensions. Science 225:951–954

    Google Scholar 

  • Flock Å (1965) Electron microscopic and electrophysiological studies on the lateral line canal organ. Acta Oto-Laryngol Stockholm (Suppl) 199:1–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Flock Å (1971) Sensory transduction in hair cells. In: Loewenstein WR (ed) Principles of receptor physiology (Handbook of sensory physiology, vol I). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 396–441

    Google Scholar 

  • Flock Å, Russell IJ (1973) The postsynaptic action of efferent fibres in the lateral line organ of the burbotLota lota. J Physiol London 235:591–605

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuda J (1974) Fiber composition of the posterior lateral-line nerve of goldfish, investigated by electrophysiological and microscopical techniques. J Comp Neurol 155:203–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Görner P (1963) Untersuchungen zur Morphologie und Elektrophysiologie des Seitenlinienorgans vom Krallenfrosch (Xenopus laevis Daudin). Z Vergl Physiol 47:316–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Görner P (1976) Source localisation with labyrinth and lateral line in the clawed toad (Xenopus laevis). In: Schuijf A, Hawkins AD (eds) Sound reception in fish. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 171–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray SJ (1984) Interaction of sound pressure and particle acceleration in the excitation of the lateral-line neuromasts of sprats. Proc R Soc London Sci B 220:299–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris GG, Bergeijk WA van (1962) Evidence that the lateralline organ responds to near-field displacements of sound sources in water. J Acoust Soc Am 34:1813–1841

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris GG, Flock Å (1967) Spontaneous and evoked activity from theXenopus laevis lateral line. In: Cahn PH (ed) Lateral line detectors. Indiana University Press, Bloomington London, pp 135–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris GG, Milne DC (1966) Input-output characteristics of the lateral line sense organ. J Acoust Soc Am 40:32–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashimoto T, Katsuki Y, Yanigasawa K (1970) Efferent system of the lateral line organ of fish. Comp Biochem Physiol 33:405–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensel H, Bromm B, Nier K (1975) Effect of ethyl-m-aminobenzoate MS222 on ampullae of Lorenzini and lateral line organs. Experientia 31:958–960

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofer B (1908) Studien über die Hautsinnesorgane der Fische. I. Die Funktion der Seitenorgane bei den Fischen. Ber Kgl Bay Biol Versuchsstation 1:115–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Horch K, Salmon M (1973) Adaptations to the acoustic environment by the squirrelfishesMyripristis violaceus andM. pralinius. Mar Behav Physiol 2:121–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Horner K, Hawkins AD, Fraser PJ (1981) Frequency characteristics of primary auditory neurons from the ear of the cod,Gadus morhua L. In: Tavolga WN, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) Hearing and sound communication in fishes. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 223–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Katsuki Y, Yoshino S, Chen J (1951a) Action currents of the single lateral-line nerve fiber offish. I. On the spontaneous discharge. Jpn J Physiol 1:87–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Katsuki Y, Yoshino S, Chen J (1951b) Action currents of the single lateral-line nerve fiber of fish. II. On the discharge due to stimulation. Jpn J Physiol 1:179–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroese ABA, Zalm JM van der, Bercken J van der (1978) Frequency response of the lateral-line organ ofXenopus laevis. Pflügers Arch 375:167–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroese ABA, Zalm JN van der, Bercken J van der (1980) Extracellular receptor potentials from the lateral-line organ ofXenopus laevis. J Exp Biol 86:63–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuiper JW (1956) The microphonic effect of the lateral line organ. Publ Biophys Group Nat Lab, Gronigen

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuiper JW (1967) Frequency characteristics and functional significance of the lateral line organ. In: Cahn PhH (ed) Lateral line detectors. Indiana University Press, Bloomington London, pp 105–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman MC (1982) Single-neuron labeling in the cat auditory nerve. Science 216:1239–1241

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmgreen L, Olsson Y (1978) A sensitive method for histochemical demonstration of horseradish peroxidase in neurons following retrograde axonal transport. Brain Res 148:279–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Moeng RS, Popper A (1984) Auditory response of saccular neurons of the catfish,Ictalurus nebulosus. J Comp Physiol A 155:615–624

    Google Scholar 

  • Münz H (1977) Untersuchungen zur peripheren Organisation der Rumpfseitenlinie beiTilapia nilotica L. (Cichlidae, Teleostei). Thesis, Universität Bielefeld

  • Münz H (1979) Morphology and innervation of the lateral line system inSarotherodon niloticus L. (Cichlidae, Teleostei). Zoomorphology 93:73–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Münz H, Claas B (1983) The functional organization of neuromasts in the lateral-line system of a cichlid fish. In: Ewert JP, Capranica RR, Ingle DJ (eds) Advances in vertebrate neuroethology. Plenum Press, New York London (NATO ASI Series A, Vol. 56), pp 301–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Münz H, Claas B, Fritzsch B (1984) Electroreceptive and mechanoreceptive units in the lateral line of the axolotlAmbystoma mexicanum. J Comp Physiol A 154:33–44

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Leary DP, Dunn RF, Honrubia V (1976) Analysis of afferent responses from isolated semi-circular canal of the guitarfish using rotational acceleration white noise inputs. I. Correlation of response dynamics with receptor innervation. J Neurophysiol 39:631–644

    Google Scholar 

  • Partridge BL, Pitcher TJ (1980) The sensory basis of fish schools: relative roles of lateral line and vision. J Comp Physiol 135:315–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters HM (1973) Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte des Lateralissystems vonTilapia (Pisces, Cichlidae). Z Morphol Tiere 74:89–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts BL (1972) Activity of lateral-line organs in swimming dogfish. J Exp Biol 56:105–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph P (1967) Zum Ortungsverhalten vonGyrinus substraticus Steph. (Taumelkäfer). Z Vergl Physiol 50:341–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell IJ (1976) Amphibian lateral line receptors. In: Llinás R, Precht W (eds) Frog neurobiology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 513–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell IJ, Lowe DA (1983) The effect of efferent stimulation on the phase and amplitude of extracellular receptor potentials in the lateral line system of the perch. J Exp Biol 102:223–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Sand O (1981) The lateral line and sound reception. In: Tavolga WN, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) Hearing and sound communication in fishes. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 459–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz E (1965) Bau und Funktion der Seitenlinie des StreifenhechtlingsAplocheilus lineatus. Z Vergl Physiol 50:55–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz E (1974) Lateral-line mechano-receptors in fishes and amphibians. In: Fessard A (ed) Electroreceptors and other specialized receptors in lower vertebrates (Handbook of sensory physiology, vol III/3). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 257–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Strelioff D, Honrubia V (1978) Neural transduction inXenopus laevis lateral line system. J Neurophysiol 41:423–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Suga N (1967) Electrosensitivity of canal and free neuromast organs in a gymnotid electric fish. J Comp Neurol 131:453–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Trewavas E (1973) On the cichlid fishes of the genusPelmatochromis with proposal of a new genus forP. congicus; on the relationship betweenPelmatochromis andTilapia and the recognition ofSarotherodon as a distinct genus. Bull Br Mus Nat Hist (Zool) 25:1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Valli P, Taglietti U, Casella CE, Rossi ML (1973) Proprietá funzionali delle diverse unita recettrici nei canali semicircolari isolati diRana. Arch Fisiol 70:94–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissert R, Campenhausen C von (1981) Discrimination between stationary objects by the blind cave fishAnoptichthys jordani (Characidae). J Comp Physiol 143:375–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Woellwarth C (1933) Ueber die Beziehungen der Seitensinnesorgane der Fische zum Nervensystem. Z Vergl Physiol 20:215–250

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fakultät für Biologie, Universität Bielefeld, Postfach 8640, D-4800, Bielefeld 1, Federal Republic of Germany

    Heinrich Münz

Authors
  1. Heinrich Münz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Münz, H. Single unit activity in the peripheral lateral line system of the cichlid fishSarotherodon niloticus L.. J. Comp. Physiol. 157, 555–568 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01351350

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01351350

Keywords

Search

Navigation