Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Towards a general model of quality assessment in higher education

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article a number of elements of a general model of quality assessment in higher education are presented. On the one hand these elements are put in a historical context of quality assessment in Medieval universities and, on the other hand, deduced from the recent experiences with quality assessment in both North-American and Western European countries. With respect to the historical context a distinction is made between the intrinsic and the extrinsic values of higher education. Two types of quality assessment related to these values are also distinguished. Concerning the recent experiences with quality assessment systems, the practices in the U.S.A., Canada, France, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom are explored. In the final section the general mode of quality assessment is discussed in the context of the distinction between the intrinsic and the extrinsic values of higher education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barak, R.J. (1982). Program Review in Higher Education. Boulder, Colorado: National Center for Higher Education Management Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, J. (1990). ‘Quality assessment in the public sector in Great Britain’, in Goedegebuure, L.C.J., Maassen, P.A.M., and Westerheijden, D.F. (eds.), Peer Review and Performance Indicators. Utrecht: Lemma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobban, A.B. (1975). The Medieval Universities, their development and organisation. London: Methuen & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobban, A.B. (1988). The Medieval English Universities: Oxford and Cambridge to c. 1500. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederiks, M.M.H., Westerheijden, D.F., and Weusthof, P.J.M. (1993). Self-evaluation and Visiting Committees, paper EAIR-Forum, Turku, 14–18 August.

  • Guin, J. (1990). ‘The reawakening of higher education in France’, European Journal of Education 25, pp. 123–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holdaway, E.A. (1988). ‘Institutional self-study and the improvement of quality’, in Kells, H.R., and van Vught, F.A. (eds.), Self-regulation, Self-study and Program Review in Higher Education. Utrecht: Lemma.

    Google Scholar 

  • IHO (Inspectie Hoger Onderwijs) (1992). De Bestuurlijke Hantering van de Resultaten van de Externe Kwaliteitszorg in het Wetenschappelijk Ondersijs. De Meern, IHO-report 1992-8.

  • Kells, H.R. (1989). ‘University self-regulation in Europe, the need for an integrated system of program review’, European Journal of Education 24, pp. 299–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kells, H.R., and van Vught, F.A. (eds.) (1988). Self-regulation, Self-Study and Program Review in Higher Education. Utrecht: Lemma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (1986). ‘The all-seeing eye of the Prince in Western Europe’, in Moodie, Gr.C. (ed.), Standards and Criteria in Higher Education. Guildford: NFER-Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G., and van Vught, F.A. (eds.) (1991). Prometheus Bound the Changing Relationship Between Government and Higher Education in Western Europe. London: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, M. (1991). Models of Quality Assessment in Europe. London, CNAA Discussion Paper 6.

  • Staropoli, A. (1991). ‘The French Comité National d'Evaluation’, in Craft, A. (ed.), Quality Assessment in Higher Education. London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • VSNU (1990). Guide for External Program Review. Utrecht.

  • van Vught, F.A. (ed.) (1989). Governmental Strategies and Innovation in Higher Education. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Vught, F.A., and Westerheijden, D.F. (1993). Quality Management and Quality Assurance in European Higher Education. Luxembourg: Office for official publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vroeijenstijn, T.I., and Acherman, H. (1990). ‘Control oriented versus improvement oriented quality assessment’, in Goedegebuure, L.C.J., Maassen, P.A.M., and Westerheijden, D.F. (eds.), Peer Review and Performance Indicators. Utrecht: Lemma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P.R. (1991). The CVCP Academic Audit Unit. Birmingham.

  • Young, D. (1990). ‘The Academic Audit Unit, an organisation for university quality management’, in Goedegebuure, L.C.J., Maassen, P.A.M., and Westerheijden, D.F. (eds.), Peer Review and Performance Indicators. Utrecht: Lemma.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Higher Education Policy Studies, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands

    Frans A. Van Vught & Don F. Westerheijden

Authors
  1. Frans A. Van Vught
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Don F. Westerheijden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Vught, F.A., Westerheijden, D.F. Towards a general model of quality assessment in higher education. High Educ 28, 355–371 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01383722

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01383722

Keywords

Search

Navigation