Skip to main content
Log in

Positive effects of conflict: A cognitive perspective

  • Articles
  • Published:
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Managers rated the extent to which conflict produces both positive and negative effects. Results indicated that they rated several negative effects significantly higher than any positive effects. However, virtually all managers reported personal experiences in which conflict yielded beneficial outcomes. These and other findings suggest that practicing managers perceive conflict as having the potential to yield positive as well as negative effects. A review of recent literature on human cognition identified several factors that may play a role in determining whether conflict yields predominantly positive or negative effects. These factors include the impact of strong negative emotions on cognition, stereotype-driven thinking, and attributional processes. Techniques for modifying conflict situations so that they are more likely to result in positive effects are suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baron, R. A. (1984). Reducing organizational conflict: An incompatible response approach.Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 272–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A. (1988): Attributions and organizational conflict: The mediating role of apparent sincerity.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 111–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A. (1990a). Conflict in organizations. In Murphy, K. R., & Saal, F. E. (eds.),Psychology in Organizations: Integrating Science and Practice. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A. (1990b). Attributions and organizational conflict. In Graham, S., & Folkes, V. (eds.),Attribution Theory: Applications to Achievement, Mental Health, and Interpersonal Conflict. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A., Fortin, S. P., Frei, R. L., Hauver, L. A., & Shack, M. L. (1990). Reducing organizational conflict: The potential role of socially induced positive affect.International Journal of Conflict Management, 1, 133–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A., & Richardson, D. R. (1991).Human Aggression (2nd ed.). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J., Shapiro, D. L., & Cummings, L. L. (1988). Causal accounts and managing organizational conflict: Is it enough to say it's not may fault?Communication Research, 15, 381–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1984).Solving Costly Organizational Conflict. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodenhausen, G. V. (1988). Stereotypic biases in social decision making and memory: Testing process models of stereotype use.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 726–737.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeois, L. J., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1988). Strategic decision processes in high velocity environments: Four cases in the microcomputer industry.Management Science, 14, 816–835.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cody, M. J., & McLaughlin, M. L. (1985). Models for the sequential construction of accounting episodes: Situational and interactional constraints on message selection and evaluation. In Street, R., Capella, J. (eds.),Sequence and Pattern in Communicative Behavior, 50–69. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosier, R. A. (1978). The effects of three potential aids for making strategic decisions on predictions accuracy.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 295–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosier, R. A., & Dalton, D. R. (1990). Positive effects of conflict: A field assessment.International Journal of Conflict Management, 1, 81–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovidio, J. H., Evans, H., & Tyler, R. B. (1986). Racial stereotypes: The contents of their cognitive representations.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 22–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1984).Social Cognition, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T. (1989). Interdependence and stereotyping: From the laboratory to the Supreme Court (and back). Invited Address, American Psychological Association, New Orleans.

  • Gilbert, D., & Jones, E. E. (1986). Perceiver-induced constraint: Interpretations of self-generated reality.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50, 269–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T., & Bargh, J. A. (1987). Social cognition and social perception.Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 369–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M., & Baron, R. A. (1991). Positive affect as a factor in organizational behavior. In Staw, B. M., & Cummings, L. L. (eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (eds.) (1982).Judgments under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, I. P., Schnittner, S. K., & Thee, S. L. (1988). Information framing effects in social and personal decisions.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 520–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linville, P. W., Fischer, G. W., & Salovey, P. (1989). Perceived distributions of the characteristics of in-group and out-group members: Empirical evidence and a computer simulation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 165–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, D. G., & Fry, L. (1990).Organization Design. In Dunnette, M. D. (ed.),Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (2nd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychological Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. T., & Ross, M. (1975). Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction?Psychological Bulletin, 82, 313–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruitt, D., & Rubin, J. Z. (1986).Social Conflict. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1985). How culture forms, develops, and changes. In R. H. Kilmann, R. H., Saxton, M. J., Serpa, R. (eds.),Gaining Control of the Corporate Culture, 17–43. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwenk, C. R. (in press). Do devil's advocacy and dialectical inquiry improve decision making: A meta-analysis.Strategic Management Journal.

  • Thomas, K. W. (1990). Conflict and negotiation processes in organizations. In Dunnette, M. D. (ed.),Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (2nd ed.), Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychological Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, D. (1985). Implications of controversy research for management.Journal of Management, 11, 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, D. (1989).Managing Conflict: The Key to Making Your Organizations Work. Minneapolis: Team Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyer, R. S. (1988). Social memory and social judgment. In P. R. Solomon, P. R., Goethals, G. R., Kelley, C. M., & Stephens, B. R. (eds.),Perspectives on Memory Research. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zillmann, D. (1979).Hostility and Aggression. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zillmann, D. (1988). Cognition-excitation interdependencies in aggressive behavior.Aggressive Behavior, 14, 51–64.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baron, R.A. Positive effects of conflict: A cognitive perspective. Employ Respons Rights J 4, 25–36 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01390436

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01390436

Key Words

Navigation