Skip to main content
Log in

Institutional change and the delivery of urban public services

  • Published:
Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Problems associated with providing efficient and equitable distribution of public services are attributable in part to the inabilities of government or other public institutions to be responsive to requirements of their clientele. To permit a better understanding of the nature of such institutional failures, and to suggest avenues of effective reform, this paper views institutional systems of service provision in a “control systems” framework. In this perspective, the elements of “feedback” are seen as essential to successful system performance over time and changing conditions. The paper identifies the kinds of “error signals” a system needs to generate, and the types of “corrective mechanisms” that it may employ, and then discusses three basic modes of institutional reform—performance evaluation, decentralization, and market competition—for improving the dynamic capability of systems of providing urban public services. Two service areas—sanitation and criminal corrections—are used for illustrating possible applications of the reform strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Humphrey, H. H., Remarks to Arthur S. Flemming Awards Luncheon, Jaycees Grand Ballroom, Mayflower Hotel, Washington, D.C., February 18, 1971.

  2. Galbraith, J. K.,American Capitalism: The Concept of Counter-Vailing Power (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1956).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Altshuler, A. A.,Community Control (New York: Pegasus, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hirschman, A. O.,Exit, Voice, and Loyalty (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Golovin, N. E., “The ‘Evaluative Function’ in Government,” unpublished draft for the Office of Science and Technology, U.S. Government, October 25, 1968.

  6. Kochen, M., and Deutsch, K. W., “Toward a Rational Theory of Decentralization: Some Implications of a Mathematical Approach,”The American Political Science Review, (September 1969).

  7. Levy, F. and Truman, E. M., “Toward a Rational Theory of Decentralization: Another View,”The American Political Science Review,65, 1971.

  8. Margolis, J., “Decentralization and Urban Programs,” in Pascal A. H., ed.,Thinking About Cities (Belmont, Calif.: Dickenson, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Downs, A. “Competition and Community Schools,” in Downs, A., ed.,Urban Problems and Prospects (Chicago: Markham, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The author wishes to thank his colleagues at the Urban Institute, especially Richard P. Burton, for suggestions and comments on the substance and style of the paper. This paper is based on ideas first presented by the author at the First Annual Convention of the World Future Society, May, 1971. Opinions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of The Urban Institute or its sponsors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Young, D.R. Institutional change and the delivery of urban public services. Policy Sci 2, 425–438 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01406143

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01406143

Keywords

Navigation