Skip to main content
Log in

GDSS research: An overview and historical analysis

  • Published:
Group Decision and Negotiation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Group Decision Support Systems (GDSS) is a relatively new area of Information Systems research, but some patterns have begun to emerge in the focus of this research and in the approaches to conducting it. This article represents a substantial review of a large body of GDSS literature and an analysis of that literature according to a specific classification scheme. The dimensions of the classification scheme include the age of the research publication, the general research approach, the philosophy underlying the data collection, the type of GDSS support, whether the research is longitudinal, and the primary focus of the research, as well as a few demographic variables such as author and source. The results of the literature analysis lead to recommendations to GDSS researchers by the authors of a need for greater use of the available research approaches and other data analysis philosophies, a greater emphasis on field work, more longitudinal research, and some changes in the focus of the research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bonnicksen, T.M. (1990). “The Future of the Texas Gulf Coast: Strategies for Managing Wetlands.” Report prepared for the Texas General Land Office by Office for Strategic Studies in Resource Policy, Texas A & M University.

  • Dennis, A.R., J.F. George, L.M. Jessup, J.F. Nunamaker Jr, and D.R. Vogel. (1988). “Information Technology to Support Electronic Meetings.”MIS Quarterly 12(4), 591–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSanctis, G., and R.B. Gallupe. (1987). “A Foundation for the Study of Group Decision Support Systems.”Management Science 33(2), 589–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, G.W., J.A. Senn, and N.L. Chervany. (1977). “Research in Management Information Systems: The Minnesota Experiments.”Management Science 23(9) (May), 913–923.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C. (1989). “Strategic Options Development and Analysis (SODA).” In J. Rosenhead (ed.),Rational Analysis in a Problematic World. Chichester, U.K.: 21–42.

  • Erickson, F. (1986). “Qualitative Methods in Research on Teaching.” In M.C. Whitlock (ed.),Handbook of Research on Teaching by a Project of the American Educational Research Association, 3rd ed. New York: MacMillan, New York, pp. 119–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetterman, D.M. (1989).Ethnography: Step by Step. California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friend, J. and A. Hickling. (1987).Planning Under Pressure: The Strategic Choice Approach, Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galliers, R.D. (1990). “Choosing Appropriate Information Systems Research Approaches: A Revised Taxonomy.” In H.E. Nissen, H.K. Klein, and R. Hirschheim (eds.),The Information Systems Research Arena of the 90's: Challenges, Perceptions and Alternative Approaches. Proceedings of IFIP TC8 WG8.2 Working Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, December 14–16.

  • Galliers, R.D., and F.F. Land. (1987). “Choosing Appropriate Information Systems Research Methodologies.”Communications of the ACM, 30(11) (November), 900–902.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grohowski, R., C. McGoff, D. Vogel, B. Martz, and J. Nunamaker. (1990). “Implementing Electronic Meeting Systems at IBM: Lessons Learned and Success Factors.”MIS Quarterly, 14(4) (December), 368–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1962).Ideas. New York: Collier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvenpaa, S.L. (1988). “The Importance of Laboratory Experimentation in IS Research.”Communications of the ACM 31(12) (December), 1502–1504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvenpaa, S.L., G.W. Dickson, and G. DeSanctis. (1985). “Methodological Issues in Experimental IS Research: Experiences and Recommendations.”MIS Quarterly 9(2) (June), 141–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klass, D.J., and G.P. Pervan. (1990). “A Programme for GDSS Research at Curtin.”Bulletin of the Australian Society for Operations Research 9(3) (September), 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, W.C. (1988).Sociological Ideas: Concepts and Applications. California: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, L.F. (1987). “A Decision Support System for Face-to-Face Groups.”Journal of Information Science 13, 211–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, L.F. (1992). “Computer Software to Support Group Decision Making.” In S. Nagel (ed.),Computer-Aided Decision Analysis: Theory & Applications.

  • McKenney, J.L. (1984). “Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration.” In F.W. McFarlan (ed.),The Information Systems Research Challenge: Proceedings. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, pp. 357–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G.H. (1963). (orig. 1934).Mind, Self and Society from the Stand-point of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pervan, G.P., and D.J. Atkinson, D.J. (1992). “Trends in GDSS Research: A Case for Plurality of Methodologies.”Proceedings of the Second International Organisational Behavior Teaching Conference, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Western Australia, December 16–19.

  • Phillips, L.D. (1988). “People-Centred Group Decision Support.” In G.I. Doukidis, F. Land, and G. Miller (eds.),Knowledge-Based Management Support Systems, Chichester, U.K.: Ellis Horwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Horn, R.L. (1973). “Empirical Studies on Management Information Systems.”Data Base 5, 172–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D.R., and J.C. Wetherbe. (1984). “MIS Research: A Profile of Leading Journals and Universities.”Data Base 16(3) (Fall), 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pervan, G.P., Atkinson, D.J. GDSS research: An overview and historical analysis. Group Decis Negot 4, 475–483 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01409711

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01409711

Key Words

Navigation