Skip to main content
Log in

Test of various theories forK-shell ionization by protons

  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Physik D Atoms, Molecules and Clusters

Abstract

Several theories for inner-shell ionization are tested by comparison with our recently published empirical reference cross-sections. The ECPSSR theory describes the data well except at low velocity where it becomes too high by as much as a factor 5. The recent RPWBA-BC calculation by Chen and Crasemann is excellent at intermediate velocity but only slightly better than ECPSSR at low velocity, since it uses the same Coulomb correction as ECPSSR, and even though it employs better wave functions. The recent SCA calculation by Hansteen et al. is the only one that describes the data within a few percent down to the lowest velocities available. The calculations by Ford et al. for Al are about 25% low. The comparatively simple formula by Montenegro and Sigaud describes the data about as well as ECPSSR, except at high velocities. Calculations by Aashamar, by Manson and by Ford et al. for Ne are about 10–20% low, but not far outside our estimated error. Our cross-sections agree well with the recent empirical fit due to Rosato but less with the fits due to Johansson et al. and Khan et al.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Paul, H.: Nucl. Instrum. Methods192, 11 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Paul, H., Obermann, W.: Nucl. Instrum. Methods214, 15 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Paul, H.: Nucl. Instrum. Methods B3, 5 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Paul, H., Muhr J.: Phys. Rep.135, 47 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hansteen, J.M., Kocbach, L., Graue, A.: Phys. Scri.31, 63 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, M.H., Crasemann, B.: At. Data Nucl. Data Tables33, 217 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Montenegro, E.C., Sigaud, G.M.: J. Phys. B18, 299 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brandt, W., Lapicki, G.: Phys. Rev. A23, 1717 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Paul, H.: Nucl. Instrum. Methods232 (B4), 211 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mukoyama, T., Sarkadi, L.: Phys. Rev. A28, 1303 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ford, A.L., Fitchard, E., Reading, J.F.: Phys. Rev. A16, 133 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Aashamar, K.: J. Phys. B14, 483 (1981); Private Communication 1984

    Google Scholar 

  13. Manson, S.T.: Phys. Rev. Lett.51, 1542 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ford, A.L., Reading, J.F., Becker, R.L.: Phys. Rev. A23, 510 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ford, A.L.: Private communication 1984

  16. Rosato E.: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Three-Day In-Depth Review of the Nuclear Accelerator Impact in the Interdisciplinary Field. Laboratori nazionali di Legnaro, Italy, (may 30-june 1, 1984) Mazzoli, P., Moschini, G., (eds.) (servizio documentazione dei laboratori nazionali di Legnaro) p. 252; Rosato, E.,: Personal Communication (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Johansson, S.A.E., Johansson, T.B.: Nucl. Instrum. Methods137, 473 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rashiduzzaman Khan, Md., Karimi M.: Nucl. Instrum. Methods172, 577 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lopes, J.S., Jesus, A.P., Ramos, S.C.: Nucl. Instrum. Methods164, 369 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paul, H. Test of various theories forK-shell ionization by protons. Z Phys D - Atoms, Molecules and Clusters 4, 249–252 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01436635

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01436635

PACS

Navigation