Skip to main content
Log in

Altérations du comportement consécutives à des lésions de la région septale du Mulot sylvestre (Apodemus Sylvaticus L.)

Septal lesions in Apodemus Sylvaticus L.

  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Lesions placed in the septum of wild mice (Apodemus Sylvaticus L.) result in a loss of the earth digging behaviour though the overall activity is increased during 15–20 days after the operation. Food intake and motricity are not impaired.

If the animal is provided with an artificial nest including a door allowing to record the number of entries and exits one may observe that some of the animals are going in and out of that nest up to 100 times in 24 hours after they have been submitted to a septal lesion. Before having been operated the same animals were only coming in and out of the nest about ten times in 24 hours. This observation points to the fact that the rhythms of spontaneous activity are deeply altered after a septal lesion, due to inadequate inhibition.

In most of the observed animals the impairement of the earth digging behaviour was proportional to the volume of tissue destroyed in the septum but on the other hand no correlations seems to exist between the size of the destroyed area and the increase of the overall activity after a septal lesion.

The continuous and quantitative record of the overall activity of the free animal and the use of Nauta's technique for the histological control — already undertaken — are going to bring a better understanding of the neuroanatomical and physiological basis of the studied behaviours.

Résumé

Dans ce travail d'approche, qui ne saurait être exhaustif, si l'on tient compte du nombre et de la complexité des questions abordées, nous constatons que des lésions d'électrocoagulation de l'aire septale entraînent chez le Mulot sylvestre une altération plus ou moins durable du comportement de construction du terrier, et une hyperréactivité temporaire qui disparaît dans la plupart des cas en 15 à 20 jours.

La prise journalière de nourriture, la motilité et la motricité des animaux opérés n'ont pas subi de modification. En revanche, en enregistrant les entrées et sorties d'une boîte mise à la disposition de quelques animaux gravement perturbés dans leur comportement de construction, on constate qu'ils entrent dans ce nid artificiel et en sortent quelque cent fois en 24 heures, alors qu'avant l'opération, on n'avait enregistré qu'une dizaine d'entrées et sorties. Cette altération du comportement suggère une désorganisation de l'activité de l'animal liée aux phénomènes connus d'inhibition déficiente, de persévération inadéquate, d'hyperréactivité.

Si l'importance et la durée de l'altération du comportement de construction peuvent être mises en relation dans la plupart des cas avec le volume de la destruction de l'aire septale et des structures voisines, il n'en va pas de même pour l'hyperréactivité. Il n'y a pas de corrélation non plus entre l'importance de cette dernière et celle de l'altération du comportement de construction.

L'enregistrement et la quantification de l'activité spontanée de l'animal sur une longue durée, l'application au Mulot sylvestre de la technique de Nauta permettront de préciser cette désorganisation de l'activité et de déterminer les structures cérébrales impliquées dans le maintien d'un comportement ≪ normal ≫.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliographie

  1. Allen, W.F.: Degeneration in the dogs mammillary body and Ammon's horn following transection of the fornix. J. comp. Neurol.80, 283–291 (1944).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amacker, J.J., Mermod, Cl. (Lausanne): La construction du terrier chez Apodemus sylvaticus L., méthode d'observation. Helv. physiol. pharmacol. Acta23, C3-C4 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Andersen, B.: Cold defense reaction elicited by electrical stimulation within the septal area of the brain in goats. Acta physiol. scand.41, 90 (1957).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Andersen, P., Bruland, H., Kaada, B.R.: Activation of the dentata area by septal stimulation. Acta physiol. scand.51, 17–28 (1961). Activation of the field CA1 of the hippocampus by septal stimulation. Acta physiol. scand.51, 29–40 (1961).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bond, D.D., Randt, C.T., Bidder, G., Rowland, V.: Posterior septal, fornical and anterior thalamic lesions in the cat. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat. (Chic.)78, 143 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brady, J.V., Nauta, W.J.H.: Subcortical mechanisms in emotional behavior; affective changes following septal forebrain lesions in the albino rat. J. comp. physiol. Psychol.46, 339–346 (1953).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brady, J.V., Nauta, W.J.H.: Subcortical mechanisms in emotional behavior; septal and habenular lesions in the albino rat. J. comp. physiol. Psychol.48, 412–420 (1955).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brucke, F., Petsche, H., Pillat, B., Deisenhammer, E.: Über Veränderungen des Hippocampus-Elektroencephalogrammes beim Kaninchen nach Novocaininjektion in der Septumregion. Arch. exp. Path. Pharmak.237, 276–284 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brucke, F., Petsche, H., Pillat, B., Deisenhammer, E.: Ein Schrittmacher in der Septumregion des Kaninchengehirnes. Arch. ges. Physiol.269, 135–140 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brugge, J.F.: Electroencephalographic changes following septal lesions in the unrestained rat. Diss. Abstr. U.S.A.24, no 9, 3810 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chamberlain, M.S., Skultety, F.M.: Mesencephalic responses elicited by septal and fornical stimulation in the cat. Neurology (Minneap.)13, no 7, 575–581 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Clark, G., Chow, K.L., Gillapsy, C., Klotz, D.A.: Stimulation of anterior limbic region in dogs. J. Neurophysiol.12, 459–463 (1949).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Covian, M.R., Antunes-Rodriguez, J., O'Flaberty, J.J.: Effects of stimulation of the septal area upon blood pressure and respiration in the cat. J. Neurophysiol.27, 394–407 (1964).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cragg, B.G., Hamlyn, L.H.: Some commissural and septal connexions of the hippocampus in the rabbit. A combined histological and electrical study. J.Physiol. (Lond.)135, 460 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cragg, B.G., Hamlyn, L.H.: Histologic connexions and electrical and autonomic responses evoked by stimulation of the dorsal fornix in the rabbit. Exp. Neurol.1, 187–213 (1959).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cragg, B.G.: Olfactory and other afferent connexions of the hippocampus in the rabbit, rat and the cat. Exp. Neurol.3, 588–600 (1961).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Craigie, E.H.: Neuroanatomy of the rat. Revised and expaned by W. Zeman et J.R. Maitland Innes. New York-London: Academic Press 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Czopf, J., Grastyan, E.: The effect of septal lesions on simple and delayed conditionning in cats. Acta physiol. Acad. Sci. hung.24, no 3, 313–319 (1964).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Feldman, S.: Neurophysiological Mechanisms Modifying afferent Hypothalamo-hippocampal Conduction. Exp. Neurol.5, 269–291 (1962).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gerebtzoff, M.A.: Note anatomo-expérimentale sur le fornix, la corne d'Ammon et leurs relations avec diverses structures encéphaliques, notamment l'épiphyse. Acta neurol. belg.42, 199–206 (1942).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gisiger, V.: Appareil permettant de placer des lésions intra-cérébrales chez le Mulot sylvestre. J. Physiol. (Paris)59, 67–80 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Goldstein, K.: Effects of non contingent septal stimulation: CER learning, response to foot shock, and electrical activity of muscle. Diss. Abstr.U.S.A.23, no 11, 4432–4433 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Green, J.D., Arduini, A.A.: Hippocampal electrical activity in arousal. J. Neurophysiol.17, 533 (1954).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Green, J.D., Adey, W.R.: Electrophysiological studies of hippocampal connections and excitability. Electroencephalog. Clin. Neurophysiol.8, 245–262 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Guillery, R.W.: Degeneration of the post-commissural fornix and the mammillary peduncle of the rat. J. Anat. (Lond.)90, 350–370 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Harrison, J.M., Lyon, M.: The role of the septal nuclei and components of the fornix in the behavior of the rat. J. comp. Neurol.108, 121 (1957).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Harvey, J.A., Jacobson, L.E., Hunt, H.F.: Long-term effects of lesions in the septal forebrain on acquisition and retention of conditioned fear. Amer. J. Psychol.16, 449 (1961) (Abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Harvey, J.A., Lints, C.E., Jacobson, L.E., Hunt, H.F.: Effects of lesions in the septal area on conditioned fear and discriminated instrumental punishment in the albino rat. J. comp. physiol. Psychol.59, 1, 37–48 (1965).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Harvey, J.A., Hunt, H.F.: Effects of septal lesions on thirst in the rat as indicated by water consumption and operant responding for water reward. J. comp. physiol. Psychol.59, 1, 49–56 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hodes, R., Peacock, S.M., Heath, R.G.: Influence of the forebrain on somato-motor activity. I. Inhibition. J. comp. Neurol.94, 381 (1951).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Karli, P.: Système limbique et processus de motivation. J. Physiol. (Paris)60, suppl. 1, 3–148 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kim, C.: Nest building, general activity, and salt preference of rats following hippocampal ablation. J. comp. physiol. Psychol.53, 11–16 (1960).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kinder, E.F.A.: A study of the nest building activity of the albino rat. J. exp. Zool.47, 117–161 (1927).

    Google Scholar 

  34. King, F.A.: Effects of septal and amygdaloid lesions on emotional behavior and conditioned avoidance responses in the rat. J. nerv. ment. Dis.126, 57–63 (1958).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kling, A., Orbach, J., Schwartz, N.B., Towne, J.C.: Injury to the limbic system and associated structures in cats. Arch. gen. Psychiat.3, 391–420 (1960).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Mac Cleary, R.A.: Response specificity in the behavioral effects of limbic system lesions in the cat. J. comp. physiol. Psychol.54, 605–613 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Mac Lardy, T.: Observations of the fornix of the monkey. I. Cell studies. II. Fiber studies. J. comp. Neurol.103, 305–327 (1955).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. MacLean, P.D., Ploog, D.W., Robinson, B.W.: Circulatory effects of limbic stimulation, with special reference to the male genital organ. Physiol. Rev.40, 105–112 (1960).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. MacLean, P.D.: Le système limbique du point de vue de la self protection et de la conservation de l'espèce. Les grandes activités du rhinencéphale II (Prof. Th. Alajouanine) Paris: Masson & Cie, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Moore, R.J.: “Rage” as a consequence of ablation of the septal nuclei in cats. Amer. J. Psychol.15, 483 (1960) (Abstracts).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Moore, R.J.: Effects of same rhinencephalic lesions on retention of conditionned avoidance behavior in cats. J. comp. physiol. Psychol.57, no 1, 65–71 (1964).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Nauta, W.J.H.: An experimental study of the fornix in the rat. J. comp. Neurol.104, 247–272 (1956).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Nauta, W.J.H.: Hippocampal projections and related neural pathways to the midbrain in the cat. Brain81, 319–340 (1958).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Nauta, W.J.H.: Limbic system and hypothalamus: anatomical aspects. Physiol. Rev.4, suppl. 40, 102–104 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Olds, J., Milner, P.: Positiv reinforcement produced by electrical stimulation of the septal area and other regions of rat brain. J. comp. physiol. Psychol.47, 419 (1954).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Parmeggiani, P.L., Rabini, C.: Effeti della lesione del setto sulle oscilliazioni lente del potentiale neocorticale destate della stimulazione ellectrica iterativa del nervo ischiatico. Boll. Soc. ital. Biol. sper.40, no 3, 128–130 (1964).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Peacock, S.M., Hodes, R.G.: Influence of the forebrain on somatomotor activity. II Facilitation. J. comp. Neurol.94, 409 (1951).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Petsche, H., Stumpf, C., Gogolak, G.: Significance of the rabbit's septum as a relay station between the midbrain and the hippocampus. I. The control of hippocampus arousal activity by septum cells. EEG and clin. J. Neurophysiol.14, 202–211 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Powell, T.P.S., Cowan, W.M.: An experimental study of the efferent connection of the hippocampus. Brain78, 115–132 (1955).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Powell, T.P.S., Guillery, R.W., Cowan, W.M.: A quantitative study of the fornix mamillo-thalamic system. J. Anat. (Lond.)91, 419–437 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Powell, E.W.: Septal efferents revealed by axonal degeneration in the rat. Exp. Neurol.8, no 5, 406–422 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Pribram, K.H., Kruger, L.: Functions of the “olfactory brain”. New York Acad. Sci.58, 109–138 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Reymond, M.C., Bättig, K.: Investigations sur le “syndrome septal” du rat consécutif à des lésions électrolytiques. J. Physiol. (Paris)56, no 6, 807–828 (1964) (paru en 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Rothfield, H., Harman, P.G.: On the relation of the hippocampal fornix system to the control of rage responses in cats. J. comp. Neurol.101, 265–282 (1954).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Spiegel, E.A., Miller, H.R., Oppenheimer, M.J.: Forebrain and rage reactions. J. Neurophysiol.3, 538–548 (1940).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Thomas, G.J., Moore, R.J., Harvey, J.A., Hunt, H.F.: Relations between the behavioral syndrom produced by lesions in the septal area of the forebrain and maze learning in the rat. J. comp. physiol. Psychol.52, 527–532 (1959).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Tracy, W.H., Harrison, J.M.: Aversive behavior following lesions of the septal region of the forebrain in the rat. Amer. J. Psychol.69, 443 (1956).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Trembley, B., Sutin, J.: Septal projections to the dorsomedial thalamic nucleus in the cat. EEG and Clin. J. Neurophysiol.31, 880–888 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Trembley, B.: A study of the function of the septal nuclei. Yale University School of Medicine: Thesis 1956.

  60. Valenstein, E.S., Nauta, W.J.H.: A comparison of the distribution of the fornix system in the rat, guinea pig, cat and monkey. J. comp. Neurol.113, 337–363 (1959).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Valverde, F.: Studies on the forebrain of the mouse. Golgi observations. J. Anat. (Lond.)97, 2, 157–180 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Votaw, C.L.: Study of the septal stimulation and ablation in the Macaque monkey. Neurology (Minneap.)10, 202–209 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Votaw, C.L., Lauer, E.W.: An efferent hippocampal fiber system in the fornix of the monkey. J. comp. Neurol.121, no 2, 195–206 (1963).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amacker, J.J. Altérations du comportement consécutives à des lésions de la région septale du Mulot sylvestre (Apodemus Sylvaticus L.). Exp Brain Res 11, 296–308 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01474388

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01474388

Key words

Navigation