Skip to main content
Log in

The environmental movement and its critics

  • Published:
Human Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The history and nature of the new environmental movement in the United States are reviewed. Since understanding of a social movement is enhanced by learning the views and perceptions of outsiders, the continuing debate between the environmental movement and its critics is examined. First, disagreements over the nature and the severity of the so-called environmental crisis are described. Second, the ideological differences between environmentalists and their critics are reviewed, particularly their contrasting views of man, society, nature, and economic growth. Finally, the political critique of the movement is examined, with attention given to the composition of the membership, the alleged superficiality of its proposed solutions to environmental problems, and the alleged discrimination against both poor people in the United States and the poor nations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaronson, T. (1972). World priorities.Environment 14(6): 4–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, C. A. (1973).Ecological Fantasies, Glen Eagle Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht, S. L. (1972). Environmental social movements and countermovements: An overview and an illustration.Journal of Voluntary Action Research 1 (4): 2–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • The American People and Their Environment — 1973 (1973). A survey conducted by the J. M. Viladas Company, Greenwich, Conn., for EPA's Office of Public Affairs. Summarized inBehavioral Sciences Newsletter (American Institutes for Research) 11(2): 4 (January 18, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1970). Ecology Action East.Rat, 10 (January 7)

  • Anonymous (1973). Down with limits to growth.Development Forum (April).

  • Anonymous (1974). American Survey.The Economist (London), 45 (March 30).

  • Bachrach, P. E., and Bergman, E. (1973).Power and Choice: The Formulation of American Population Policy, Lexington Books, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, B. (1971). Function, variability, and change in ideological systems. In Barber, B., and Inkeles, A. (eds.),Stability and Social Change, Little, Brown, Boston, pp. 244–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behan, R. W. (1974). The liturgy of the environment.Worldview, 27–32 (January).

  • Bennett, J. W. (1974). Personal communication.

  • Bennett, J. W., Hasegawa, S., and Levine, S. B. (1973). Japan: Are there limits to growth?Environment 15(10): 6–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benoit, E. (1974). Comment.Society, 14–25 (March/April).

  • Bering, C. (1973). Review.Environmental Action 5(14): 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bookchin, M. (1970). Ecology and revolutionary thought.Motive, 33–41 (April/May).

  • Boulding, K. E. (1970). Fun and games with the gross national product. In Helfrich, H. W., Jr. (ed.),The Environmental Crisis, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretsky, S. S. (1974). Ecologists are male chauvinist pigs.Development Forum 2(4): 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. R. (1970).Seeds of Change: The Green Revolution and Development in the 1970's, Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burch, W. R., Jr. (1971).Daydreams and Nightmares: A Sociological Essay on the American Environment, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttell, F. H., and Flinn, W. L. (1973). The structure of support for the environmental movement: 1968–1970. Unpublished paper.

  • Carson, R. (1962).Silent Spring, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claus, G., and Bolander, K. (1974).Ecological Sanity: A Critical Examination of the Bad Science, Good Intentions, and Premature Doomsday Announcements of the Ecology Lobby, David McKay, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coale, A. J. (1970a). Man and his environment.Science 170: 132–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coale, A. J. (1970b). Review of Ehrlich and Ehrlich,Population, Resources, Environment. Science 170: 428–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, H. S. D., Freeman, C., Jahoda, M., and Pavitt, K. L. R. (eds.) (1973).Models of Doom: A Critique of “The Limits to Growth,” Universe Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commoner, B. (1971).The Closing Circle, Knopf, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commoner, B. (1972a). A Bulletin dialogue on “The Closing Circle.” Response: Barry Commoner.Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 16–17 (May).

  • Commoner, B. (1972b). The environmental cost of economic growth. In Ridker, R. G. (ed.),Population, Resources, and the Environment, Vol. 3, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commoner, B. (1972c). Review: “The Closing Circle.”Environment 14(3): 23–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, J. (1974). Letter to the editor.New York Times, 22 (August 12).

  • Crosland, A. (1971).A Social Democratic Britain, Fabian Society, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daedalus (1973). The no-growth society. 102(4): 1–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, H. E. (ed.) (1973).Toward a Steady-State Economy, Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Castro, J. (1973). Pollution problem No. 1: Under-development.Unesco Courier, 20–23 (January).

  • Devall, W. (1970). The governing of a voluntary organization: Oligarchy and democracy in the Sierra Club. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of Oregon.

  • Downs, A. (1972). Up and down with ecology — the “issue-attention cycle.”Public Interest, 38–50 (Summer).

  • Drucker, P. F. (1972). Saving the crusade.Harpers 244: 66–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubos, R. J. (1973). Humanizing the earth.Science 179: 769–772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P. (1968).The Population Bomb, Ballantine, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P. (1972). The hysteria against the case.Arnoldia 32(5): 226–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P., and Ehrlich, A. H. (1972).Population, Resources, Environment: Issues in Human Ecology, Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P., and Holdren, J. P. (1972a). A Bulletin dialogue on “The Closing Circle.”Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 27(5): 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P., and Holdren, J. P. (1972b). Impact of population growth. In Ridker, R. G. (ed.),Population, Resources, and the Environment, Vol. 3, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., pp. 365–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P., and Holdren, J. P. (1972c). Review: “The Closing Circle.”Environment 14(3): 24–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • England, R., and Bluestone, B. (1973). Ecology and social conflict. In Daly, H. E. (ed.),Toward a Steady-State Economy, Freeman, San Francisco, pp. 199–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J. (1973). Can we afford sliced eggplant?The New York Review, 13–16 (April 5).

  • Faich, R. G., and Gale, R. P. (1971). The environmental movement: From recreation to politics.Pacific Soc. Rev. 14: 270–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischman, L. L., and Landsberg, H. H. (1972). Adequacy of nonfuel minerals and forest resources. In Ridker, R. G. (ed.),Population, Resources, and the Environment, Vol. 3, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., pp. 77–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, D. (1972). Roots of the new conservation movement.Perspectives in American History 6: 7–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, S. (1970). Ecology movement exposed.Progressive Labor 7(6): 50–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, C. F. (1973).The Environment in Japan, The American University Field Staff Reports, East Asia Series, Vol. XX, p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi, I. (1972). The unfinished revolution.Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 28(7): 35–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, M. I. (1970). The convergence of environmental disruption.Science 170: 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayson, M. J., and Shepard, T. R., Jr. (1973).The Disaster Lobby: Prophets of Ecological Doom and Other Absurdities, Follett, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1972). Population skeletons in the environmental closet.Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 37–41 (June).

  • Harroy, J. P. (1974). Stop the train, the bridge is down!Development Forum 2(3): 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harry, J., Gale, R., and Hendee, J. (1969). Conservation: An upper-middle class social movement.Journal of Leisure Research 1(3): 246–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, P. M. (1971). Review of Ehrlich, Paul R. and Anne H., “Population, resources, environment: Issues in human ecology.”Social Biology, 443–446 (December).

  • Hawley, A. H. (1973). Ecology and population.Science 179: 1196–1201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holdren, J. P. (1973). Population and the American predicament: The case against complacency.Daedalus 102(4): 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornback, K. E. (1974). Orbits of opinion: The role of age in the environmental movement's attentive public, 1968–1972. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Sociology, Michigan State University.

  • Horowitz, I. L. (1972). The environmental cleavage: Social ecology versus political economy.Social Theory and Practice 2(1): 125–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huth, H. (1957).Nature and the American, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, N. (1970). The environmental crisis.Center Magazine 3(6): 37–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahoda, M. (1973). Postscript on social change. In Cole, H. S. D., Freeman, C., Jahoda, M., and Pavitt, K. L. R. (eds.),Models of Doom: A Critique of “The Limits to Growth,” Universe Books, New York, pp. 209–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. (1973).The Politics of Environment: The British Experience, Tom Stacey, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaysen, C. (1972). The computer that printed out W*O*L*F*.Foreign Affairs 50(4): 660–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kifner, J. (1974). Franconia Notch: Highway battle site.New York Times, 25 (July 29).

  • Kirk, D. (1973). Computerized prophecy: “The Limits to Growth.”Contemporary Psychology 18(1): 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, D. (1974). Personal communication.

  • Klausner, S. Z. (1972). Alienation in ecological perspective. In Bier, W. C. (ed.),Alienation: Plight of Modern Man? Fordham University Press, New York, pp. 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohl, D. (1972). Review of Richard Neuhaus,In Defense of People. Unpublished paper.

  • Krieger, M. H. (1970). Six propositions on the poor and pollution.Policy Sciences 1: 311–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krieger, M. H. (1973). What's wrong with plastic trees?Science 179: 446–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruvant, W. J. (1974). Who gets polluted? An investigation of the incidence of air pollution in Washington, D.C. Unpublished paper, Washington Center for Metropolitan Studies, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landsberg, H. H. (1967). The U.S. resource outlook: Quantity and quality.Daedalus, 1034–1057 (Fall).

  • Landsberg, H. H. (1974). Materials resources in 1990 and beyond: What will we have left to work with? Unpublished paper, Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal, D. (1970a). Earth day.Area 4: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal, D. (1970b). The environmental crusade: Ideal and realities.Landscape Architecture, 290–296 (July).

  • Lowry, R. P. (1971). Toward a radical view of the ecological crisis.Environmental Affairs 1(2): 350–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luten, D. B. (1971). Population growth. In Brown, M. (ed.),The Social Responsibility of the Scientist, Free Press, New York, pp. 184–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luten, D. B. (1973). Fading away?Western Outdoors Annual 40: 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeish, A. (1971). Quoted in Neuhaus, R.,In Defense of People, Macmillan, New York, p. 72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddox, J. (1972).The Doomsday Syndrome, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandel, W. M. (1972). The Soviet ecology movement.Science & Society 36(4): 385–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, P. (1974). Quoted in a leaflet announcing the Planning and Conservation League's Conference, “Saving Our Cities: The Last Wilderness,” held in San Francisco, June 8, 1974.

  • Marstrand, P. K., and Pavitt, K. L. R. (1973). The agricultural sub-system. In Cole, H. S. D., Freeman, C., Jahoda, M., and Pavitt, K. L. R. (eds.),Models of Doom: A Critique of “The Limits to Growth,” Universe Books, New York, pp. 56–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, L. (1964).The Machine in the Garden: Technology and the Pastoral Ideal in America, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, L. (1970). American institutions and ecological ideals.Science 170: 945–952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, A. (1973a). Disputes between experts.Minerva 11(2): 243–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, A. (1973b). Personal communication.

  • McCarthy, J. D., and Zald, M. N. (1973).The Trend of Social Movements in America: Professionalization and Resource Mobilization, General Learning Press, Morristown, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEvoy, J., III (1972). The American concern with environment. In Burch, W. R., Jr., Cheek, N. H., Jr., and Taylor, L. (eds.),Social Behavior, Natural Resources, and the Environment, Harper and Row, New York, pp. 214–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKean, R. N. (1973). Growth vs. no growth: An evaluation.Daedalus 102(4): 207–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPhee, J. (1972).Encounters with the Archdruid, Ballantine, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, M. (1973). Personal communication.

  • Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., and Behrens, W. W., III (1972).The Limits to Growth, Universe Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., and Behrens, W. W., III (1973). A response to Sussex. In Cole, H. S. D., Freeman, C., Jahoda, M., and Pavitt, K. L. R. (eds.),Models of Doom: A Critique of “The Limits to Growth,” Universe Books, New York, pp. 217–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, R. L. (1973). The other side of pollution. In Pohlman, E. (ed.),Population: A Clash of Prophets, New American Library, New York, pp. 204–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishan, E. J. (1970).Technology and Growth: The Price We Pay, Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishan, E. J. (1973). Ills, bads, and disamenities: The wages of growth.Daedalus 102(4): 63–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, D. E. (1973). The environmental movement: Conflict dynamics.Journal of Voluntary Action Research 2(2): 74–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, D. E., Hornback, K. E., and Warner, W. K. (1972). The environmental movement: Some preliminary observations and predictions. In Burch, W. R., Jr., Cheek, N. H., Jr., and Taylor, L. (eds.),Social Behavior, Natural Resources, and the Environment, Harper and Row, New York, pp. 259–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, D. E., Hornback, K. E., and Warner, W. K. (compilers) (1974).Environment: A Bibliography of Social Science and Related Literature, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munson, B. E. (1972). The ecology movement: An assessment. Unpublished paper, Department of Sociology, Eastern Illinois University.

  • Nash, R. (1973).Wilderness and the American Mind, rev. ed., Yale University Press, New Haven (first published in 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuhaus, R. (1971).In Defense of People: Ecology and the Seduction of Radicalism, Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, D. K., and Wachtel, D. D. (1974). Energy, the environment, and the poor. Unpublished paper, Washington Center for Metropolitan Studies, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Notestein, F. W. (1970). Personal communication.

  • Novick, S. (1974). Personal communication.

  • Olson, M., Landsberg, H. H., and Fisher, J. L. (1973). Epilogue.Daedalus 102(4): 229–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oltmans, W. L. (1974).On Growth: The Crisis of Exploding Populations and Resource Depletion, Putnam, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozorio de Almeida, M. A. (1973). The myth of ecological equilibrium.Unesco Courier, 25–28 (January).

  • Paddock, W., and Paddock, P. (1967).Famine — 1975! Little, Brown, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, W. (1973). The population sub-system. In Cole, H. S. D., Freeman, C., Jahoda, M., and Pavitt, K. L. R. (eds.),Models of Doom: A Critique of “The Limits to Growth,” Universe Books, New York, pp. 43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passell, P., and Ross, L. (1971). Review of Richard Neuhaus' “In Defense of People,”New York Times Book Review 6: 16 (October 17).

    Google Scholar 

  • Passell, P., and Ross, L. (1973).The Retreat from Riches: Affluence and Its Enemies, Viking, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passmore, J. (1974).Man's Responsibility for Nature: Ecological Problems and Western Traditions, Scribners, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, K. L. R. (1973). Malthus and other economists: Some doomsdays revisited. In Cole, H. S. D., Freeman, C., Jahoda, M., and Pavitt, K. L. R. (eds.),Models of Doom: A Critique of “The Limits to Growth,” Universe Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pole, N. (1973). An interview with Paul Ehrlich.The Ecologist 3(1): 18–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quarles, J. R., Jr. (1973). A test of our commitment.Environmental News, 1–8 (November).

  • Quigg, P. W. (ed.) (1973).World Directory of Environmental Education Programs, Bowker, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quigg, P. W. (1974). Of conservationists and their critics.Saturday Review/World, 35 (June 1).

  • Reich, M., and Huddle, E. G. (1973). Pollution and social response.Area Development in Japan 7: 34–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridker, R. G. (1973). To grow or not to grow: That's not the relevant question.Science 182: 1315–1318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, W. C. (1969). A critical note on the new conservationism.Land Economics 42: 453–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salgo, H. (1973). The obsolescence of growth: Capitalism and the environmental crisis.Review of Radical Political Economics 5(3): 26–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnaiberg, A. (1973a). Politics, participation, and pollution: The environmental movement. In Walton, J., and Carns, D. E. (eds.),Cities in Change: Studies on the Urban Condition, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, pp. 605–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnaiberg, A. (1973b). Social conflicts in environmental decisions. Unpublished paper, Department of Sociology, Northwestern University.

  • Schnaiberg, A. (1974). The first and last dialectic: Social impacts of environmental quality and societal scarcity. Unpublished paper, Department of Sociology, Northwestern University.

  • Schultz, T. W. (1972). The ecosystem doom.Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 12–17 (April).

  • Shepard, P., and McKinley, D. (eds.) (1969).The Subversive Science: Essays Toward an Ecology of Man, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, H., and Hunt, E. K. (1972). Pollution in radical perspective.Business and Society Review 3: 48–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simcock, B. L. (1972). Environmental pollution and citizens' movement: The social sources and significance of anti-pollution protest in Japan.Area Development in Japan 5: 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, T. C. (1973). Environmentalism: A la recherche du temps perdu — bien perdu? In Cole, H. S. D., Freeman, C., Jahoda, M., and Pavitt, K. L. R. (eds.),Models of Doom: A Critique of “The Limits to Growth,” Universe Books, New York, pp. 175–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C., and Freedman, A. (1972).Voluntary Associations: Perspectives on the Literature, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. H. (1973). Methodology of the study “Profile of the environmental movement.” In Zinger, C., Dalsemer, R., and Magargle, H. (eds.),Environmental Volunteers in America, Environmental Protection Agency, PB 214 186, Washington, D.C., pp. 508–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. N. (ed.) (1974).Environmental Quality and Social Justice in Urban America, Conservation Foundation, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprout, M., and Sprout, H. (1971).Ecology and Politics in America: Some Issues and Alternatives, General Learning Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, P. B. (1973).Did We Save the Earth at Stockholm? Earth Island, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surrey, A. J., and Bromley, A. J. (1973). Energy resources. In Cole, H. S. D., Freeman, C., Jahoda, M., and Pavitt, K. L. R. (eds.),Models of Doom: A Critique of “The Limits to Growth,” Universe Books, New York, pp. 192–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Train, R. E. (1974). Remarks before the Pennsylvania Environmental Council, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Environmental News, 3–11 (April).

  • Trop, C., and Roos, L. L., Jr. (1971). Public opinion and the environment. In Roos, L. L., Jr. (ed.),The Politics of Ecosuicide, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp. 52–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallich, H. (1972). Zero growth.Newsweek 79: 62 (January 24).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, B. (1971).Beyond Repair: The Ecology of Capitalism. Beacon Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, B. (1972). The browning of Stockholm: America takes its ecology show abroad.Ramparts, 33–40 (September).

  • Wharton, C. R., Jr. (1969). The green revolution: Cornucopia or Pandora's box?Foreign Affairs 47: 464–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L., Jr. (1969). The historical roots of our ecologic crisis.Science 155: 1203–1207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. H. (1968).The Last Landscape, Doubleday, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinger, C. L., Dalsemer, R., and Magargle, H. (1973).Environmental Volunteers in America, Environmental Protection Agency, PB 214 186, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwerdling, D. (1973). Poverty and pollution.The Progressive 37(1): 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwerling, S. (1973). Bart.Environment 15(10): 14–19.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sills, D.L. The environmental movement and its critics. Hum Ecol 3, 1–41 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01531771

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01531771

Key Words

Navigation