Skip to main content
Log in

A developmental perspective on religious orientation dimensions

  • Published:
Journal of Religion and Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

L.B. Brown's model of religious faith posits two bipolar religious orientations (intrinsic-extrinsic and autonomy-observance) that represent a two-dimensional space in which a religious believer can be located. This paper proposes a developmental sequence within Brown's model. The psychometric tradition of religious orientations is combined with a developmental tradition. The developmental process is consistent with models by A. Maslow, L. Kohlberg, J. Fowler, and J. Loevinger. Religious faith typically springs from extrinsic motivations. Most religious adherents achieve the next level, “observance,” or identification with a religious community and its creeds. Some progress to intrinsic religiousness, and fewer attain religious autonomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brown, L.B., “Classifications of Religious Orientation,”J. Scientific Study of Religion, 1964,4, 91–99.

    Google Scholar 

  2. —, “A Study of Religious Belief,”British J. Psychology, 1962,53, 259–272.

    Google Scholar 

  3. E.g., Allport, G.W., and Ross, J.M., “Personal Religious Orientation and Prejudice,”J. Personality and Social Psychology, 1967,5, 432–443; Hoge, D.R., “A Validated Intrinsic Religious Motivation Scale,”J. Scientific Study of Religion, 1972,11, 369–376.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fleck, J.R., “Dimensions of Personal Religion: A Dichotomy or Trichotomy?” In Donaldson, W.J., Jr., ed.,Research in Mental Health and Religious Behavior. Atlanta, Psychological Studies Institute, 1976. See also Allen, R.O., and Spilka, B., “Committed and Consensual Religion: A Specification of Religious Prejudice Relationships,”J. Scientific Study of Religion, 1967,6, 191–206.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Batson, C.D., “Religion as Prosocial: Agent or Double Agent?”loc. cit., 1976,15, 29–45.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Meadow, M.J., “The Structure of Religious Attitudes: A Factor Analytic Study,” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1976.

  7. Kahoe, R.D., and Meadow, M.J., “Religious Orientation Dimensions: Individual and Institutional Interrelations.” Paper read at the Society for the Scientific Study of Religion, Chicago, October, 1977.

  8. Brown, “Classifications of Religious Orientation,”loc. cit..

    Google Scholar 

  9. E.g., Rokeach, M.,The Open and Closed Mind. New York, Basic Books, 1960; Wilson, G.D.,The Psychology of Conservatism. New York, Academic Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rokeach,op. cit., E.g., p. 67.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Batson,op. cit.; “Religion as Prosocial: Agent or Double Agent?”loc. cit., 1976,15, 29–45.; Kahoe and Meadow,op. cit.; Kahoe, R.D., “The Psychology and Theology of Sexism,”J. Psychology and Theology, 1974,2, 284–290.

  12. Kahoe, R.D., “Personality and Achievement Correlates of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Religious Orientations,”J. Personality and Social Psychology, 1974,29, 812–818; Kahoe, R.D., and Dunn, R.F., “The Fear of Death and Religious Attitudes and Behavior,”J. Scientific Study of Religion, 1975,14, 379–382; Thompson, A., “Openmindedness and Indiscriminate Antireligious Orientation,”loc. cit., 1974,13, 471–477.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kahoe, “Personality and Achievement Correlates of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Religious Orientations”op. cit..

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kahoe and Meadow,op. cit. “Religious Orientation Dimensions: Individual and Institutional Interrelations.” Paper read at the Society for the Scientific Study of Religion, Chicago, October, 1977.

  15. Allport, G.W., “The Individual and His Religion. New York. Macmillan, 1950, p. 71.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Maslow, A., “A Theory of Human Motivation”,Psychological Review, 1943,50, 370–396.

    Google Scholar 

  17. —,The Farther Reaches of Human Nature. New York, Viking, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kohlberg, L., “The Child as a Moral Philosopher,”Psychology Today, September, 1968, 25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See Berryman, J.W., ed.,Life Maps: Conversations on the Journey of Faith, Waco, Texas, Word Books, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Loevinger, J., “The Meaning and Measurement of Ego Development,”American Psychologist,” 1966,21, 195–206; —Ego Development, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kohlberg,op. cit. “The Child as a Moral Philosopher,”Psychology Today, September, 1968, 25–30.

  22. Allport and Ross,op. cit.“.

    Google Scholar 

  23. E.g., Batson,op. cit. “Religion as Prosocial: Agent or Double Agent?”loc. cit., 1976,15, 29–45.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Brown, “Classifications of Religious Orientation,”op. cit., p. 96.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kahoe, R.D., Meadow, M.J. A developmental perspective on religious orientation dimensions. J Relig Health 20, 8–17 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01533283

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01533283

Keywords

Navigation