Skip to main content
Log in

Intrapersonal variations in stage of moral reasoning among adolescents as a function of situational context

  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

On a set of classical moral dilemmas and on a set of practical moral dilemmas 60 randomly selected eighth- and twelfth-grade students were asked to (a) judge the actions of others (judgment) and (b) reach a personal decision and give reasons for what they would do (deliberation). The interviews were transcribed and scored for stage of moral reasoning. Stage of moral reasoning associated with deliberation on practical moral dilemmas was found to be significantly lower than their moral judgment on classical moral dilemmas. An explanation was presented which combined social learning and cognitive-developmental moralization theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aronfreed, J. (1968).Conduct and Conscience, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronfreed, J. (1976). Moral development from the standpoint of a general psychological theory. In Lickona, T. (ed.),Moral Development and Behavior, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. F., Kohlberg, L., Lerner, J., and Belenky, M. (1971). Moral reasoning about sexual dilemmas: The development of an interview and scoring system. InTechnical Report of the Commission on Obscenity and Pornography. Vol. 1 (No. 5256-0010), Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haan, N. (1975). Hypothetical and actual moral reasoning in a situation of civil disobedience.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 32: 255–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haan, N., Smith, M. B., and Block, J. (1968). Moral reasoning of young adults: Political social behavior, family background and personality correlates.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 10: 181–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, R. E. (1968).Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences, Brooks/ Cole, Belmont, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1971). From is to ought: How to commit the naturalistic fallacy and get away with it in the study of moral development. In Michel, T. (ed.),Cognitive Development and Epistemology, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1972).Issue Scoring Guide, Laboratory of Human Development, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtines, W., and Grief, E. (1974). The development of moral thought: Review and evaluation of Kohlberg's approach.Psychol Bull. 81: 453–470.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. (1973). The hierarchial nature of moral judgment: A study of patterns of comprehension and preference of moral stages.J. Personal. 41: 86–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J., Turiel, and Kohlberg, L. (1969). Relations between level of moral judgment and preference and comprehension of the moral judgment of others.J. Personal. 37: 225–252.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received his Ph.D. from the University of Wisconsin at Madison. Research interests include the nature of moral character and the implications involved for the moral education curriculum.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leming, J.S. Intrapersonal variations in stage of moral reasoning among adolescents as a function of situational context. J Youth Adolescence 7, 405–416 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01537808

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01537808

Keywords

Navigation