Abstract
Since Congress passed the American Indian Gambling Regulatory Act (IGRA) in 1988, there has been an explosion in the number of gambling casinos located on Native American reservations. It is estimated that in 1994 the total net revenue from 81 Native American casinos exceeded $2.3 billion dollars. As the number of Native American casinos grows along with the volume of gambling activity, opposition increases from states, the established gambling industry hurt by lost revenues, and groups with moral objections to gambling. This article reports on an effort to measure the economic impact of the Fort McDowell casino located near Phoenix, Arizona. The article discusses the casino's history and current operations. Next, it explains the use of an input-output model to compute the impact of casino's income and employment effects on the economy of Maricopa County. It is estimated that the casino is responsible for 2,483 new jobs, and an increase of approximately $80.35 million in regional output. Additional information is necessary to more accurately assess both the benefits and costs of the casino. Unfortunately, subsequent efforts to collect additional data have been unsuccessful. The conclusion discusses why, and raises questions regarding Native American gaming.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anders, G.C. (1989). Social and economic consequences of federal Native American policy: A case study of the Alaska Natives.Economic Development and Cultural Change, 37, 285–303.
Anders, G.C. (1980). Theories of underdevelopment and the Native American.Journal of Economic Issues, 14, 681–701.
Arizona Department of Economic Security (1992). Population Statistics Unit.1990 Census Summary.
Barker, J. (1994, May 19). States ask more say in Native American gaming.Arizona Republic, A7.
Eadington, W.R. (1990).Native American gaming and the law. Reno, Nevada: Institute for the Study of Gambling.
Feldman, G. (1993). The great casino controversy.Arizona Attorney, July, 19–23.
Friedman, J., Hakim, S. & Weinblatt, J. (1989). Casino gambling as a “growth pole” strategy and its effects on crime.Journal of Regional Science, 29, 615–624.
Goodman, R. (1994).United States gambling study. Northampton, Massachusetts: University of Massachusetts.
Grinols, E. (1994). Bluff or winning hand? Riverboat gambling and regional employment and unemployment.Illinois Business Review, spring, 8–11.
Kachel, D. (1987). A ray of hope on the reservation.Business and Society Review, 63, 36–39.
KPMG Peat Marwick. (1992).Economic, benefits of tribal gaming in Minnesota. Minneapolis, Minnesota, March.
Marfels, C. (1994). Concentration, competition, and competitiveness in the casino gaming industry. Unpublished manuscript submitted for publication.
Midwest Hospitality Advisors. (1992).Impact of Native American gaming in the State of Minnesota. Minneapolis, Minnesota, February.
Miernyk, W.H. (1965).The elements of input-output analysis. New York: Random House.
Monney, B. (1993). Dances with dollars: Native American gaming's challenge to racing.The Horse Blood, 113, March 13, 1262–1265.
Murray, J.M. (1993).The economic benefits of Native American gaming facilities in Wisconsin. Green Bay, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin-Green Bay, Cooperative Extension.
Nevada Gaming Control Board (1995).Gaming reports, January.
Regional Impact Model, Regional Science Research Institute. (1992).PC I-O user's manual
Penske, S. Industry Analyst, Wertheim Schroder. (1994, May 24). Personal communication.
Phillips, M. (1992). Arizona-the next Las Vegas.Scottsdale Daily Press, July, E2-E5.
Rohs, J. & Daniels, W. (1993). Wertheim The continuing explosion in gaming.Wertheim Schroder Gaming Industry Update, March.
Sidener, J. (1995, June 30). 17 casino workers fired for criminal past.The Arizona Republic B1.
Sidener, J. (1995, March 23). Symington facing off with tribes on gaming.The Arizona Republic, A1.
Sidener, J. (1993, July 19). Gaming profits make American dream ‘a real thing’ for tribe.The Arizona Republic, A1.
Snipp, C.M. ed. (1988).Public policy impacts on Native American economic development. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico, Native American Studies.
The Center for Applied Research. (1993, April).The economic impact of Native American reservation-based gaming activities. Denver, Colorado.
Truelove, W. & Bunting, D. (1971).The economic of paternalism: federal policy and the Klamath Native Americans. Unpublished paper. Department of Economics, University of Oregon.
Turner, B. (1993). Native American gaming.Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 34, 53.
University Associates. (1992).Economic impact of Michigan's Native American gaming enterprises. Lansing, Michigan, July.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis, (1992).Regional multipliers: A handbook for regional input-output modeling system (RIMS II), second edition. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, (1991). 1990 census of population and housing. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anders, G.C. Native American casino gambling in Arizona: A case study of the Fort McDowell reservation. J Gambling Stud 12, 253–267 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01539322
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01539322