Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A simultaneous comparison of three methods for language training with an autistic child: An experimental single case analysis

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of autism and childhood schizophrenia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a single-case, simultaneous-treatment design, three methods for experimental language acquisition in one autistic child were compared using a Latin square design and trend-line analysis. Results showed a total communication approach to be significantly superior to sign-based and verbalization approaches. The verbalization treatment resulted in decreased performance. Results indicate that use of a cross-modality inhibitory process to explain the alleged superiority of the sign-based approach is questionable. Variation among autistic children indicates a need for further research and for caution against premature acceptance of a given treatment approach or theoretical explanation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference notes

  1. Bonvillion, J. D., & Nelson, K. E.Sign language acquisition in a mute autistic boy. Unpublished paper, 1974. (Available from Dr. Douglas O. Brady, Child Study Center, 1300 West Lancaster, Fort Worth, Texas 76102.)

  2. Creedon, M. P.Language development in nonverbal autistic children using a simultaneous communication system. Paper presented at the Society for Research in Child Development Meeting, Philadelphia, March 1973.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association.Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (2nd ed.). Washington, D.C.: Author, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benjamin, L. S. A special Latin square for the use of each subject as his own control.Psychometrika, 1965,30, 499–513.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Browning, R. M. A same-subject design for simultaneous comparison of three reinforcement contingencies.Behavior Research and Theory, 1967,5, 231–243.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Browning, R. M., & Stover, D. D.Behavior modification in child treatment. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Churchill, D. W. The relation of infantile autism and early childhood schizophrenia to developmental language disorders of childhood.Journal of Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia, 1972,2, 182–197.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fulwiler, R. L., & Fouts, R. S. Acquisition of American Sign Language by a noncommunicating autistic child.Journal of Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia, 1976,6, 43–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hermelin, B., & O'Connor, N.Psychological experiments with autistic children. Elmsford, New York: Pergamon Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hersen, M., & Barlow, D. H.Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change. Elmsford, New York: Pergamon Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Miller, A., & Miller, E. E. Cognitive developmental training with elevated boards and sign language.Journal of Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia, 1973,3, 65–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. O'Connor, N. Visual perception in autistic children. In M. Rutter (Ed.),Infantile autism: Concepts, characteristics and treatment. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Siegel, S.Nonparametric methods for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tubbs, V. K. Types of linguistic disability in psychotic children.Journal of Mental Deficiency Research, 1966,10, 230–240.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Webster, C. D., McPherson, H., Sloman, L., Evans, M. A., & Kuchar, E. Communicating with an autistic boy by gestures.Journal of Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia, 1973,3, 337–346.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. White, O. R.The split-middle: A quickie method of trend analysis. Eugene, Oregon: Regions/Resource Center for Handicapped Children, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Child Study Center, 1300 West Lancaster, 76102, Fort Worth, Texas

    Douglas O. Brady (Chief Clinical Psychologist)

  2. University of Oklahoma, USA

    Albert D. Smouse

Authors
  1. Douglas O. Brady
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Albert D. Smouse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This study was based on the first author's doctoral dissertation completed at the University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, under the direction of Roger Fouts, Ph.D., Roger Melgren, Ph.D., Robert Ragland, Ph.D., Lucien Rose, Ph.D., and Albert D. Smouse, Ph.D.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brady, D.O., Smouse, A.D. A simultaneous comparison of three methods for language training with an autistic child: An experimental single case analysis. J Autism Dev Disord 8, 271–279 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01539630

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01539630

Keywords

Search

Navigation